Support Our Work
The work that we do at FQxI is only possible because of the generous donations that we have received over the years. The work we support is high-risk, high-reward, and outside of the remit of the short-term thinking of national funding agencies. Support our work to help keep science open-minded, inquisitive, and optimistic.
DECADES of
Progress
How We Make a Difference
FQxI runs grant programs that have awarded over $29 Million to 650 researchers and outreach specialists.
We host conferences bringing together FQxI Members with other top scientists, philanthropists, and thought leaders. These gatherings have sparked discussions that have led to collaborations and even the building of new science institutes.
Through QSpace, we reach millions with our science content featuring grantees, important news, our popular podcast, and more.
FQxI hosts competitions to engage all who are interested in questions at the foundation of science, be they high-profile academics, students, or people outside of academia and science institutes who are interested in these questions.
We encourage high-risk, high-reward work in which scientists dream big and then get to work testing their ideas.
Read More
arrow
Testimonials
“FQxI grants have given me the "excuse" I needed to justify working on topics I am passionate about and have given me a valuable lifeline before obtaining a permanent position. I probably would no longer be in academia were it not for FQxI.”
Eric Cavalcanti
“For philosophy, which aims to give the big picture about humans and their place in nature, fundamental science is a gold-mine. FQxI has played a unique, and indispensable role, in breaking down the traditional disciplinary boundaries between science and philosophy. Long may it continue to do so!”
Jeremy Butterfield
QSpace Latest
Video: IPI Talk – Dr. Emily Adlam: Are Entropy Bounds Epistemic?
Entropy bounds have played an important role in the development of holography as an approach to quantum gravity. In this talk I will introduce the strong and covariant entropy bounds, and then discuss how the covariant bound should be interpreted. I will argue that there is a possible way of thinking about the covariant entropy bound which would suggest that it encodes an epistemic limitation rather than an objective count of the true number of degrees of freedom on a light-sheet; thus I will distinguish between ontological and epistemic interpretations of the covariant bound. I will consider the consequences that these interpretations might have for physics and discuss what each approach has to say about gravitational phenomena. My aim is not to advocate for either the ontological or epistemic approach in particular, but rather to articulate both possibilities clearly and explore some arguments for and against them.