ABOUT THE FQXi PODCAST

The FQXi podcast brings you the latest ideas in foundational physics and cosmology—and includes interviews with our members and other leading scientists. It's hosted by Zeeya Merali and Brendan Foster. You can contact us at podcast@fqxi.org, and follow us on twitter: @FQXi. The podcast is produced by Zeeya, and music is provided by Baltimore-based Diefenbaker.

The FQXi podcast brings you the latest ideas in foundational physics and cosmology—and includes interviews with our members and other leading scientists. It's hosted by Zeeya Merali and Brendan Foster. You can contact us at podcast@fqxi.org, and follow us on twitter: @FQXi. The podcast is produced by Zeeya, and music is provided by Baltimore-based Diefenbaker.

RECENT FORUM POSTS

**Eckard Blumschein**: "Robert and Malcom, See me itinerant and a bit worried by Feynman’s..."
*in* The Quantum Agent

**Peter Morgan**: "That's not what the preview showed! Grrrrr. Aaaaannnnndddd I can't edit it...."
*in* An algebraic approach to...

**Peter Morgan**: "I have to hope that better understanding the relationship between the..."
*in* An algebraic approach to...

**John Wilson**: "Hi Malcolm, Thanks for reading some of my paper, I really appreciate it. ..."
*in* Alternative Models of...

**Malcolm Riddoch**: "Steve Agnew: “I hope this will be useful to you and I do encourage your..."
*in* Alternative Models of...

**Amrit Sorli**: "BB cosmology has some troubles. I think that it will not last for a long..."
*in* Alternative Models of...

**Joe Fisher**: "A visible person could dig or bore a fixed hole with visible sides in a..."
*in* The Quantum Agent

**Joe Fisher**: "The most compelling evidence that the ability of white men of only being..."
*in* Undecidability,...

RECENT ARTICLES

*click titles to read articles*

**The Quantum Agent**

Investigating how the quantum measurement process might be related to the emergence of intelligence, agency and free will.

**First Things First: The Physics of Causality**

Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

**Can Time Be Saved From Physics?**

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

**Thermo-Demonics**

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

**Gravity's Residue**

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

RECENT ARTICLES

Investigating how the quantum measurement process might be related to the emergence of intelligence, agency and free will.

Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

PODCAST

February 27, 2020

Complete Podcast

The FQXi **December 24, 2019** Podcast features:

- Schrödinger Squared

INFO: **MP3 file / 57 minutes / 60 MB**

LISTEN:

Featured video in this podcast:

Individual Stories

Schrödinger Squared

An amped up version of the Schrodinger Cat Paradox spells trouble for all quantum interpretations -- according to its architect Renato Renner. He tells Zeeya and Brendan how the controversial thought experiment works, and why he thinks it is bad news for fans of Many Worlds and quantum parallel universes, QBism, Collapse models and (less so) for Bohmian interpretations of quantum mechanics. But not everyone agrees.

INFO: **MP3 file / 57 minutes / 60 MB**

LISTEN:

RELATED LINKS:

*Nature Communications:*Paper by Frauchiger and Renner*FQXi blog:*Watching the Watchmen--George Musser implements a quantum circuit to test the Frauchiger-Renner paradox*FQXi video:*Modelling Physical Agents with a Quantum Computer, by Lidia del Rio*Nature News:*Reimagining of Schrödinger Cat Breaks Physics

PODCAST ARCHIVE

- 2019: Year in Physics Review Part 2

- 2019: Year in Physics Review Part 1

- Quantum Supremacy Milestone?

- Quantum Mind Reading -- Adam Brown

- Downward Causation -- George Ellis

- Designing the Mind -- Susan Schneider

- Measuring Free Will -- Ian Durham

- How Do We Make Decisions? -- Carlo Rovelli

- Building an AI Physicist -- Max Tegmark

- Future of Computation -- Fred Adams

- Memory, Causality and Cats -- Sean Carroll

View All Archived Podcasts

Comment on this Podcast

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!

Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

You may use superscript (10

^{100}) and subscript (A_{2}) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.You may use bold (

**important**) and italics (*emphasize*) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation
[hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview

preview equation

clear equation

insert equation into post at cursor

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview

preview equation

clear equation

insert equation into post at cursor

Attachments
[hide]

You may optionally attach up to two documents to your post. To add an attachment, use the following feature to browse your computer and select the file to attach. The maximum file size for attachments is 1MB.

Once you're done adding file attachments, click the "Submit New Post" button to add your post.

You may optionally attach up to two documents to your post. To add an attachment, use the following feature to browse your computer and select the file to attach. The maximum file size for attachments is 1MB.

Once you're done adding file attachments, click the "Submit New Post" button to add your post.

JOHN R. COX wrote on January 13, 2020

George,

We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a dynamic track record not only of prediction in application to specific tasks, but also in discovery. Its worth noting that where we have seen discovery in QM it has been by theoretical regimes which are quasi-Relativistic, ie: inverse square law subject to Lorentz Invariance.

The question posed by Frauchiger and Renner, does contend inconsistency. But all the underpinning of QM parameters are classical laws...

George,

We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a dynamic track record not only of prediction in application to specific tasks, but also in discovery. Its worth noting that where we have seen discovery in QM it has been by theoretical regimes which are quasi-Relativistic, ie: inverse square law subject to Lorentz Invariance.

The question posed by Frauchiger and Renner, does contend inconsistency. But all the underpinning of QM parameters are classical laws...

JOHN R. COX wrote on January 13, 2020

Georgi,

by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel, Aaronson summed it as what is proven is that we can prove QM is a theory. The 'why' that it works is omething that goes to vast numbers of events in the simplest macroscopic thing. A mature Maple tree in my neighborhood might produce 30,000 leaves in a season, yet there is still a small area way up in the wind where a few, scattered, dead leaves cling to their twigs in January. What are the odds of that, and what odds of...

Georgi,

by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel, Aaronson summed it as what is proven is that we can prove QM is a theory. The 'why' that it works is omething that goes to vast numbers of events in the simplest macroscopic thing. A mature Maple tree in my neighborhood might produce 30,000 leaves in a season, yet there is still a small area way up in the wind where a few, scattered, dead leaves cling to their twigs in January. What are the odds of that, and what odds of...

GEORGINA WOODWARD wrote on January 13, 2020

Thanks for taking the time John. By 'relying on what they are sent' I mean what I think you are referring to as the 'classical record'.

Right now I'm thinking you can't make silk purse out of a sows ear. It starts out with quantum correlations and uses quantum maths and quantum explanations and ends up with something unexpected. I'm not sure if it is a true paradox, an*impossibility* (most likely indicating something wrong with the theory) or just what you get if you follow the...

Thanks for taking the time John. By 'relying on what they are sent' I mean what I think you are referring to as the 'classical record'.

Right now I'm thinking you can't make silk purse out of a sows ear. It starts out with quantum correlations and uses quantum maths and quantum explanations and ends up with something unexpected. I'm not sure if it is a true paradox, an

read all podcast comments