Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:46am UTC, wrote Gods, I look like a functional illiterate above. But, as G.H. Hardy once...

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:44am UTC, wrote spelling and grammar are poor at 3:44Am. Back to sleep.

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:41am UTC, wrote The real point of Sputnik was that the doppler shift of it's radio signal...

William Orem: on 10/5/07 at 19:50pm UTC, wrote By some reports (speakers of Russian correct me here) a passable...


Georgina Woodward: "Hi Markus, ​ In regard to "what is seen next?" David Eagleman has a..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Stefan Weckbach: "Dear Lorraine, “If you will forgive me for saying so, the situation is..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Markus, thank you for sharing your ideas. Re. the Guinea pigs copies,..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Georgina Woodward: "Perhaps the idea of consciousness causing collapse is being overthought? ..." in Consciousness and the...

Lorraine Ford: "Stefan, I would say that we individual human beings, and the rest of the..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "Thank you John. What did you think about the questioning whether altitude..." in The Nature of Time

John Cox: "Sorry, Georgina, I have had a busy summer and am racing the change of..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "If the Earth did not have it`s rotational motion, the apparent time of day..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

click titles to read articles

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

September 26, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Co-Travelers [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Oct. 5, 2007 @ 19:50 GMT
By some reports (speakers of Russian correct me here) a passable translation of "Sputnik" is "co-traveler," in the sense of "one who travels alongside." There's a whole art to scientific designation -- the choosing of terms for what we create, or discover -- but that old familiar name seems doubly apt. In one sense it's appropriate for the basketball-sized piece of machinery that became the first,...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:41 GMT
The real point of Sputnik was that the doppler shift of it's radio signal allowed the Russians to do accurate gravitometric

analysis of the path of an ICBM ( note, B for Ballistic) missile that would be aimed at a US hardened missile silo.

This would have put the warhead close enough to destroy our silo.

THAT is: IT said the Russians had first strike capacity.

That was scary.

The E. administration wanted us to have a satellite for

spy purposes--but this was problematical in international law==and when the Russians launched their satellite during

IGY ( it was the USA that suggested the ides for IGY), it

gave us a legal leg.

In fact, the E administration did what it could to slow our

development of such a satellite until the Russians launched--by encouraged infighting between the army and the airforce. But E. and his politicians didn't understand about

the science i mentioned above--and left the USA vulnerable to a first strike nuclear war. Note the "Evil Empire" didn't

use its advantage--which happened twice--because later, it was the Russians that had the first deliverable H-Bomb.

The USA could have had a satellite earlier, as Von Braun

knew what to do, and was lobbying for it--but giving the project ot the US air force slowed things down. They bungled

it because after Sputnik because the USA trained engineers

didn't understand what the inverse of matrix was--and they

programed the guidance system wrongly--which caused "abort and explode" at liftoff. Finally, we gave the program to Von

Braun--who launched our first satellite.

Our IGY program was called "Explorer" and it was a cover for the E. Spy satellite program--not scientific, as claimed.

One of these satellites "discovered" the Van Allen belts--actually discovered by a grad student of Van Allen

using detectors on a balloon.

IT was this spy satellite program--very successful--that later gave President Kennedy info to do successful brinkmanship with the Russians during the Cuban Missile


There was a secret manned space program in the USA coming directly out of these satellites, with Chuck Yeager as director, under the cover of the "Manned Orbiting Lab"

to have a manned spy satellite that had higher capacities

than a simple satellite--but it died do to the increase in

the capability of electronics.

( Of course, there was at least on other secret manned space program here in the USA because their was a second shuttle base --for secret military missions--at Vandenberg Air Force base. The existence of this base was NOT kept secret. But, that is a separate story--mentioned here only for completeness.

Finally, Sputnik does mean "fellow traveler'--which was

a politically significant phrase--as supports of international communism were known as Sputnik or

Fellow Travelers.

Non of the above is classified and all of it has been explored by PBS and other open sources.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:44 GMT
spelling and grammar are poor at 3:44Am.

Back to sleep.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:46 GMT
Gods, I look like a functional illiterate above. But, as G.H. Hardy once remarked " In practice, multiplication doesn't commute before breakfast".

Back to sleep.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.