Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

ari saaput: on 7/17/18 at 10:32am UTC, wrote 5 Obat Kanker Paling Ampuh ini Sengaja Disembunyikan Bertahun-Tahun Demi...

Yahoo support: on 5/24/18 at 6:25am UTC, wrote I actually did not understand the blog what the author wants to convey, so...

reseller propolis: on 5/24/18 at 3:01am UTC, wrote Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil ...

songjoong df: on 1/2/18 at 8:45am UTC, wrote jual qnc jelly gamat di magelang jual qnc jelly gamat di mataram jual qnc...

songjoong df: on 12/27/17 at 6:35am UTC, wrote cara menjadi reseller qnc jelly gamat Cara Menjadi Agen Qnc Jelly Gamat ...

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:46am UTC, wrote Gods, I look like a functional illiterate above. But, as G.H. Hardy once...

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:44am UTC, wrote spelling and grammar are poor at 3:44Am. Back to sleep.

penny: on 11/13/08 at 8:41am UTC, wrote The real point of Sputnik was that the doppler shift of it's radio signal...


Robert McEachern: "Eckard, I do have an interest in the history, but not as much as I used..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Robert, While Carroll and Rovelli are looking for an explanation of..." in First Things First: The...

Georgina Woodward: "The Schrodinger's cat thought experiment presents 3 causally linked state..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Roger Granet: "Well put! Physics is hard, but biochemistry (my area), other sciences..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Georgina Woodward: "BTW The neck scarves are a promotional souvenir given out at non sports..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Robert McEachern: ""At the risk of stroking physicists’ egos, physics is hard" But every..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "lol Zeeya it is well thought this algorythm selective when names are put in..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "is it just due to a problem when we utilise names of persons?" in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

October 18, 2019

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Co-Travelers [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Oct. 5, 2007 @ 19:50 GMT
By some reports (speakers of Russian correct me here) a passable translation of "Sputnik" is "co-traveler," in the sense of "one who travels alongside." There's a whole art to scientific designation -- the choosing of terms for what we create, or discover -- but that old familiar name seems doubly apt. In one sense it's appropriate for the basketball-sized piece of machinery that became the first,...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:41 GMT
The real point of Sputnik was that the doppler shift of it's radio signal allowed the Russians to do accurate gravitometric

analysis of the path of an ICBM ( note, B for Ballistic) missile that would be aimed at a US hardened missile silo.

This would have put the warhead close enough to destroy our silo.

THAT is: IT said the Russians had first strike capacity.

That was scary.

The E. administration wanted us to have a satellite for

spy purposes--but this was problematical in international law==and when the Russians launched their satellite during

IGY ( it was the USA that suggested the ides for IGY), it

gave us a legal leg.

In fact, the E administration did what it could to slow our

development of such a satellite until the Russians launched--by encouraged infighting between the army and the airforce. But E. and his politicians didn't understand about

the science i mentioned above--and left the USA vulnerable to a first strike nuclear war. Note the "Evil Empire" didn't

use its advantage--which happened twice--because later, it was the Russians that had the first deliverable H-Bomb.

The USA could have had a satellite earlier, as Von Braun

knew what to do, and was lobbying for it--but giving the project ot the US air force slowed things down. They bungled

it because after Sputnik because the USA trained engineers

didn't understand what the inverse of matrix was--and they

programed the guidance system wrongly--which caused "abort and explode" at liftoff. Finally, we gave the program to Von

Braun--who launched our first satellite.

Our IGY program was called "Explorer" and it was a cover for the E. Spy satellite program--not scientific, as claimed.

One of these satellites "discovered" the Van Allen belts--actually discovered by a grad student of Van Allen

using detectors on a balloon.

IT was this spy satellite program--very successful--that later gave President Kennedy info to do successful brinkmanship with the Russians during the Cuban Missile


There was a secret manned space program in the USA coming directly out of these satellites, with Chuck Yeager as director, under the cover of the "Manned Orbiting Lab"

to have a manned spy satellite that had higher capacities

than a simple satellite--but it died do to the increase in

the capability of electronics.

( Of course, there was at least on other secret manned space program here in the USA because their was a second shuttle base --for secret military missions--at Vandenberg Air Force base. The existence of this base was NOT kept secret. But, that is a separate story--mentioned here only for completeness.

Finally, Sputnik does mean "fellow traveler'--which was

a politically significant phrase--as supports of international communism were known as Sputnik or

Fellow Travelers.

Non of the above is classified and all of it has been explored by PBS and other open sources.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:44 GMT
spelling and grammar are poor at 3:44Am.

Back to sleep.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

penny wrote on Nov. 13, 2008 @ 08:46 GMT
Gods, I look like a functional illiterate above. But, as G.H. Hardy once remarked " In practice, multiplication doesn't commute before breakfast".

Back to sleep.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

ari putri saaput wrote on Jul. 17, 2018 @ 10:32 GMT
5 Obat Kanker Paling Ampuh ini Sengaja Disembunyikan Bertahun-Tahun Demi Tujuan Jahat

1. Biji Anggur, Obat Mujarab Kanker yang Disembunyikan

Obat Kencing Nanah

Ada begitu banyak penelitian yang mengungkapkan akan kandungan dari biji anggur. Tak hanya memiliki antioksidan tinggi, biji buah manis ini juga ternyata ampuh untuk membunuh sel-sel kanker. Setidaknya ada belasan ilmuwan yang menelitinya dan dipastikan memang biji ini sakti melawan kanker.

2. Buah Sirsak Juga Sangat Ampuh Menghancurkan Kanker

Sama seperti biji anggur, sirsak ternyata juga mengandung zat yang sangat ampuh melawan kanker. Hal ini juga dibuktikan lewat beberapa penelitian dan hasilnya memang sangat mujarab. Bahkan, salah seorang peneliti mengatakan Gejala Kencing Nanahjika buah sirsak ini sepuluh ribu kali lipat lebih manjur daripada kemoterapi.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.