Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Daniel Darg: on 5/23/11 at 23:22pm UTC, wrote Thanks for your comment Armin, Yeah, I thought about about talking about...

James Putnam: on 3/8/11 at 20:03pm UTC, wrote Daniel Darg, Very well done. I think this essay fits the contests criteria...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/23/11 at 18:43pm UTC, wrote I would say if it doesn't exist a limit, even our density and the dynamic...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/23/11 at 18:36pm UTC, wrote Hi all, How is it possible to know if the universe is finite or not? I...

James Hoover: on 2/23/11 at 1:59am UTC, wrote Dan, Enjoyed your essay. I am not hard to convince that reality is...

Armin Nikkhah Shirazi: on 2/22/11 at 4:59am UTC, wrote Dan, I liked your essay because the central idea was clearly stated and...

Emmanuel Moulay: on 2/19/11 at 16:41pm UTC, wrote Dear Daniel, Your essay is very interesting. I have a remark and a...

Dan Darg: on 2/18/11 at 23:50pm UTC, wrote Thanks Steve. Yeah - I could have tagged on that if we did discover the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Zeeya Merali: "Viviana Fafone is a member of the VIRGO collaboration that detects..." in Micro and macro-physics...

Zeeya Merali: "Antonino Cataldo describes the how to synthesize bio-nanotechnologies to..." in Bionanotechnologies and...

Zeeya Merali: "What is the scientific approach? Matteo Martini talks about the..." in The 21st Century News...

Zeeya Merali: "in this introductory lecture, Frederick Van Der Veken discusses physics at..." in Big Machines, High...

Zeeya Merali: "FQXi's Catalina Curceanu discusses how particle physics experiments at the..." in Strangeness in Neutron...

Zeeya Merali: "Leader of the NEXT group, Stefano Bellucci, discusses applications of..." in Nanomaterials for...

Zeeya Merali: "FQXi's Lorenzo Maccone delves into the one of the deepest question in..." in What is Time? by Lorenzo...

Fabio SCIARRINO: "An introductory lecture on how developments in quantum physics over the..." in The Second Quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.

Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.

The Quantum Agent
Investigating how the quantum measurement process might be related to the emergence of intelligence, agency and free will.

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.


FQXi FORUM
May 31, 2020

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: An Infinite Universe - An Analog Reality by Daniel Wingate Darg [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Daniel Wingate Darg wrote on Feb. 16, 2011 @ 14:32 GMT
Essay Abstract

I put forth a simple, heuristic case that if the universe is infinite in spatial extent, then it is analogue in nature.

Author Bio

DPhil student, astrophysics, Oxford.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


James Putnam wrote on Feb. 16, 2011 @ 19:38 GMT
Dear Daniel Wingate Darg,

I am certain the universe is analogue. Your brief abstract gained my attention. I am printing your essay. Good luck to you.

James

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Dan Darg replied on Feb. 18, 2011 @ 23:48 GMT
Thanks - let me know what you think of it.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

James Putnam replied on Mar. 8, 2011 @ 20:03 GMT
Daniel Darg,

Very well done. I think this essay fits the contests criteria very well. It approached the question in a readable fashion by non-specialists. Yet it reached for a definite conclusion. So much was said with so little technical jargon. It made sense to me. Thank you for participating.

James

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 03:34 GMT
Analog reality is the Apparent reality that we perceive digitally.

With Best Wishes,

Jayakar Johnson Joseph

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steev Dufourny wrote on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 19:52 GMT
Hello,

I have always thought that Universe is finite, the number also,thus only our adds and multiplications ...imply the infinity.

Your essay is well writen and reasoned.

Good luck for this contest.

Steve

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Dan Darg replied on Feb. 18, 2011 @ 23:50 GMT
Thanks Steve. Yeah - I could have tagged on that if we did discover the universe to be finite, that could well lend credence to 'reality being digital.'

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Emmanuel Moulay wrote on Feb. 19, 2011 @ 16:41 GMT
Dear Daniel,

Your essay is very interesting. I have a remark and a question. Since several years, we know that the rate of expansion of the universe is certainly increasing. So, we have added a cosmological constant in the Einstein’s fields equation. Nowadays, its dynamic is dominant. How is it possible to know if the universe is finite or not? During the previous century, we hoped that the cosmological observations provide an answer to this question by analyzing the rate of expansion. If there is a cosmological constant then I don’t know how it is possible to answer to this question. The first time of the universe, when the cosmological constant was not dominant, could provide the answer. I don't know.

Emmanuel

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 23, 2011 @ 18:36 GMT
Hi all,

How is it possible to know if the universe is finite or not?

I beleive simply that the thermodynamics are essential in its cooling no? and it doesn't exist a kind of limits , that has no sense.The only infinity appears with our adds and mult. and perceptions....it is the same for our quantum world and its limirs and walls...all our equations are based on that.The spherical closed system are relevant in 3D.

Best Regards

Steve

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 23, 2011 @ 18:43 GMT
I would say if it doesn't exist a limit, even our density and the dynamic expansion contraction has no sense...even all our mechanic and all our proportionalities with the evolution and the entropic arrow of time.Even the genral relativity ...in fact we need limits, domains...it's essential.

Regards

Steve

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Armin Nikkhah Shirazi wrote on Feb. 22, 2011 @ 04:59 GMT
Dan,

I liked your essay because the central idea was clearly stated and made a connection between two concepts (particle number, precision of particle position) in which infinities could conceivably appear which might not have been obvious otherwise.

The only quibble I have is that the fundamental lesson of relativity is that spacetime, not space, is fundamental, and your essay still seemed too much tied to the pre-relativistic viewpoint. I believe this is only a minor objection as this argument should be adoptable to a four-dimensional version without much difficulty, although then some additional subtleties (non-conservation of particle number, finite age of the universe etc. ) may make for a richer discussion.

Good job and best wishes,

Armin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Daniel Darg replied on May. 23, 2011 @ 23:22 GMT
Thanks for your comment Armin,

Yeah, I thought about about talking about time more but I figured, as you seemed to agree, that the central idea could have been extended to either an A or B theory of time, so I figured I'd leave the essay short and simple as it is, (especially since there are SO many essays for people to go through!).

Best

Dan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


James Lee Hoover wrote on Feb. 23, 2011 @ 01:59 GMT
Dan,

Enjoyed your essay. I am not hard to convince that reality is analogue since that is my claim. You displayed more objectivity than I, indicating the claim is based on some thinking that points in that direction.

Jim Hoover

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.