Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Anonymous: on 3/16/11 at 6:02am UTC, wrote Paul, Thanks for the kind words. The paper published here is a greatly...

Paul Halpern: on 3/8/11 at 22:21pm UTC, wrote Dear Ken, I am impressed by the scope of your paper and your effort to...

Ken Matusow: on 3/5/11 at 8:42am UTC, wrote Juan, Thank you for your interest in my essay. As you noted there is a...

Juan Enrique Ramos Beraud: on 2/26/11 at 9:26am UTC, wrote The last post is mine, I did send it anonymous as a mistake.

Anonymous: on 2/26/11 at 9:24am UTC, wrote Ken A quite interesting essay. If I understand well your axiomatic system...

Ken Matusow: on 2/15/11 at 10:24am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract A simple general system is defined that has exactly...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Agnew: "There are some questions that do not seem to have answers in the classical..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Agnew: "Yes, there are two very different narratives. The classical narrative works..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Dufourny: "Joe,so lol you speak to God or it has send you this information lol ?..." in First Things First: The...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 14, 2019

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: Lenny, Me, and Entropy by Ken Matusow [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Ken Matusow wrote on Feb. 15, 2011 @ 10:24 GMT
Essay Abstract

A simple general system is defined that has exactly three properties: the system is non-continuous, non-deterministic, and has a well-defined, consistent metric. It is asserted that many of the basic concepts, principles, and equations of quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, including those of special and general relativity, are derivable, and indeed are unavoidably emergent from first principles given these three properties, and these three properties only.

Author Bio

Ken Matusow has an MS in General Systems Theory from the State University of New York at Binghamton. In addition to his unaffiliated research in foundational physics and systems theory Ken is a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and writer.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Anonymous wrote on Feb. 26, 2011 @ 09:24 GMT
Ken

A quite interesting essay.

If I understand well your axiomatic system describes the behavior of a "particle" and it's movement in a manner that makes me recall the game of life.

I should study it deeper to make further comments.

But I though I should drop a comment.

As a professional I also am a computer and IT related entrepreneur who has gone back to study physics. For me this is a hubby, if this essay of you is result of your hubby, I guess you've gone a long way with this axiomatic system.

I've been following professor Susskin physics courses via web, essentially because I don't live in the area. I live in Mexico city, but I did live an study at Berkeley and Fremont some many years ago. Currently my company represents SGI in Mexico, so I travel there often.

Please read my essay and drop a comment if you can. In the mean time I will continue studing your essay.

Regards

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Juan Enrique Ramos Beraud wrote on Feb. 26, 2011 @ 09:26 GMT
The last post is mine, I did send it anonymous as a mistake.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Ken Matusow replied on Mar. 5, 2011 @ 08:42 GMT
Juan,

Thank you for your interest in my essay. As you noted there is a similarity between the model in the essay and cellular automata. However there is also an enormous difference, notably cellular automata models physical systems as a completely deterministic process whereas the model described in the essay models physical processes as a completely non-determinstic process. In certain cellular automata entirely deterministic rules can mimic pseudo-random events. In the model I presented stochastic processes can be shown to mimic deterministic events. In essence they are both very similar and very different.

Ken

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Paul Halpern wrote on Mar. 8, 2011 @ 22:21 GMT
Dear Ken,

I am impressed by the scope of your paper and your effort to reproduce quantum mechanics through the random walk problem and stochastic dynamics. Your axiomatic approach is admirable.

Best wishes,

Paul

Paul Halpern, The Discreet Charm of the Discrete

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Mar. 16, 2011 @ 06:02 GMT
Paul,

Thanks for the kind words. The paper published here is a greatly simplified version of a more technical paper. If you are interested seeing any of these more technical versions, please let me know and I can send them to you.

Good luck with the contest,

Ken

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.