Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Tom Chesters: on 4/25/11 at 23:36pm UTC, wrote Dear Professor Paul Halpern, When if one day we ever come to understand...

Tom Chesters: on 4/25/11 at 23:00pm UTC, wrote Sorry I am so late in responding to you, Peter. I’ve been focusing on a...

Paul Halpern: on 3/11/11 at 3:25am UTC, wrote Tom, Interesting to speculate about the nature of the void. Understanding...

Peter Jackson: on 3/8/11 at 19:05pm UTC, wrote Tom Wow. Interesting, unique, quite different. I can't understand why...

Tom Chesters: on 2/14/11 at 12:40pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The following speculative essay is based on, but...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Manistha Jain: "Thanks for the Information, I was looking hair care and hair transplant in..." in Serious Science. Serious...

Alex: "Another variant ..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Georgina Woodward: "That the seen spacetime, and reference frame of the observer, those..." in Breaking the Universe's...

Georgina Woodward: "Perhaps I can word that more clearly. The human observer's self generated..." in Breaking the Universe's...

Jonathan Dickau: "Sorry again... I should have read more of the linked attachment before..." in If the world ended...

Jonathan Dickau: "Sorry, Some of these arguments appear vacuous, or depend on hidden..." in If the world ended...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar..." in Dissolving Quantum...

Joe Fisher: "Robert Lawrence Kuhn ℅ Closer To Truth November 17, 2018 Ref: Get out..." in Dissolving Quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

Constructing a Theory of Life
An all-encompassing framework of physics could help to explain the evolution of consciousness, intelligence, and free will.

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.


FQXi FORUM
November 21, 2018

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: Digital vs. Analog Reality: An Alien Perspective by Tom Chesters [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Tom Chesters wrote on Feb. 14, 2011 @ 12:40 GMT
Essay Abstract

The following speculative essay is based on, but differs substantially from, an imaginary “theory of reality” that was briefly considered in my 2000 science fiction novel, The OverFile. The overall view of the essay regards relativistic spacetime reality as being subsistent within a dynamic, supersensible digital matrix that is thought to naturally appear within an otherwise static, analog void reality. The term digital matrix, as used in the essay, is generally understood to be a ubiquitous geometrical vibrational system within which, as which, and through the action of which, spatiotemporal reality originates, takes form, further develops, and is therein sustained while it persists via regeneratively interactional pre-quantal and quantal vibrational processes. The essay suggests that the appearance of either analog or digital results to specific experiments occurs because this deeper causal nature of the underlying void reality prompts these confusing results. Again, the essay speculates that spacetime reality is being everywhere effected into a sustained, regenerative quantum pattern system of subsistence within an intrinsically vibrant, geometric matrix format that is innate within the ultimate nature of the infinite, eternal void. And that, accordingly, our observing minds within this fundamental, regeneratively interactional quantum reality are equivalently, subsistently sustained as virtual radial fields of awareness via further regenerative procedural systems within our respective bodies and brains. Thus, the essay will also provide a brief theoretical account of the operative nature of the brain as a digital submatrix to our virtual mindfields to account for observers within the context of the void digital matrix system. This speculative account of an analog void reality and its digital matrices does not appear to conflict with any known experimental observations. Thus, however outwardly alien in perspective, the views given are ostensibly consistent with current experimental findings.

Author Bio

Tom Chesters is a science fiction writer and an inventor with numerous patents.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 8, 2011 @ 19:05 GMT
Tom

Wow. Interesting, unique, quite different. I can't understand why no-one else has commented. I suppose as it's a bit tempero-cosmological, though I did very much like your supersensible 'digital matrix'. But I must say I did feel I'd got lost on the odd occasion!

I don't know what you'd make of mine, which is a bit more bricks and mortar rebuilding physics more logically. It's quite different but consistent with a few other good ones (see the strings). I suspect you may have the required visualisation skills. There's also a link to a more cosmological conclusions paper which you may enjoy.

Best wishes.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Tom Chesters replied on Apr. 25, 2011 @ 23:00 GMT
Sorry I am so late in responding to you, Peter. I’ve been focusing on a new patent (www.jixis.com/RAF.htm). I tried locating your essay and could not locate it using variations of Peter Jackson as a search phrase. Please send me the link at jixis@aol.com. Also, Thank you for your kind words!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Paul Halpern wrote on Mar. 11, 2011 @ 03:25 GMT
Tom,

Interesting to speculate about the nature of the void. Understanding the vacuum is one of the profound challenges of modern science.

Best wishes,

Paul

Paul Halpern, The Discreet Charm of the Discrete

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Tom Chesters replied on Apr. 25, 2011 @ 23:36 GMT
Dear Professor Paul Halpern,

When if one day we ever come to understand the true nature of the void, I doubt that I will have played any role whatever in that knowledge. Nonetheless, I also think it is interesting to speculate about the ultimate nature of the void. Your holonistic version of reality sounds promising and may very well be true.

Best regards,

Tom Chesters

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.