Search FQXi

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Introduction

Order posts by:
chronological order
most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Domenico Oricchio: on 3/13/11 at 9:14am UTC, wrote Thank you for your post. I don’t wait for posts, so the reply was not...

Peter Jackson: on 3/11/11 at 17:58pm UTC, wrote Orichio I was surprised to find no comments here so late in the process. ...

Domenico Oricchio: on 2/14/11 at 12:33pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I hypothesize that each elementary particle is a...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: ""At the risk of stroking physicists’ egos, physics is hard" But every..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

George Musser: "Imagine you could feed the data of the world into a computer and have it..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "Personally Joe me I see like that ,imagine that this infinite eternal..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "Joe it is wonderful this,so you are going to have a nobel prize in..." in First Things First: The...

Robert McEachern: ""I'm not sure that the 'thing as it is' is irrelevant." It is not. It is..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "lol Zeeya it is well thought this algorythm selective when names are put in..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "is it just due to a problem when we utilise names of persons?" in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Georgina Woodward: "I suggested the turnstiles separate odd form even numbered tickets randomly..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

RECENT ARTICLES

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

FQXi FORUM
October 18, 2019

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: A String Solution in Quantum Gravity by Domenico Oricchio [refresh]

Author Domenico Oricchio wrote on Feb. 14, 2011 @ 12:33 GMT
Essay Abstract

I hypothesize that each elementary particle is a wave function in a spacetime bubble, and I hypothesize the existence of infinite types of interaction forces, fermions and bosons. I suppose that the Landau-Lifsitz pseudotensor is the general relativity differential equation, the Scheibe operator, over the relativistic wave function that are arbitrary function of the metric density, the square root of the negative determinant of the metric tensor

Author Bio

graduation: mechanical engineering degree: physics thesis: deterministic neural network and fuzzy neural netwoek master: advanced technology in communication and information research: -Genova,fractal dimensionality and experimental discrete equation -Marina di Ravenna, fluid dynamic and bacteria grow equation -Vietri sul mare, fluido dynamic model applied to soil pollution and associate bioremediation -Manchester (interrupted), Natural Gradient Descent and Indipendent Component Analysis

Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 11, 2011 @ 17:58 GMT
Orichio

I was surprised to find no comments here so late in the process. I was interested in your essay, which seemed to contain some good and original ideas. But it was the first line of your abstract that caught my attention as it is highly equivalent in some ways to my own central thesis.

I've developed a model where ALL matter has a space time bubble around it. Where particles get together to form molecules, the bubble combines barycentrically, yet each free particle also retains it's own if if in motion with resect to it's background.

This is equivalent to Einsteins "All mass is spatially extended", and when in motion more ions condense to form the interplanetary shocks, galactic halos' and Pe clouds around accelerated particles.

But none of that is as important as the result - these discrete fields allow local backgrounds, which avoids Bells inequalities to give Locality and Reality. Special Relativity via a Quantum Mechanism, also then (via condenses mass) giving Equivalence. And all within the SR postulates, explaining constant light speed.

I believe our theories departed somewhere along the line but am not sure precisely. I'm not a physicist or mathematician, though my essay is now in the top 10 as those with good conceptual skills can see the logical solution.

I hope you may too, and hope you can read it (the string is also good). It is consistent with leader Edwins 'C field', Parry's reality, Castel, Spoljaric, Benedict, and others, and particularly Regazas maths. I don't know if yours may be consistent with all, but hope you don't let your community votes go to waste and you support those you wish to. http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/803

In particular your views on applicability of your use of the WDW to mine may be helpful, in terms of your; "An elementary particle have a synchronized membrane because each massless boson cannot be used to obtain simultaneity, this is a con firmation that the WDW di erential equation is an appropriate candidate to particle description because WDW have not time coordinate; each elementary particles is a singularity in the spacetime for the same reason, because a little surface must be simultaneous."

You may also like the short paper linked in my string on universe recycling! Despite a little improvement to your English required I feel your essay should be higher and shall wave my wand.

I look forward to your views.

Best wishes

Peter

report post as inappropriate

Author Domenico Oricchio replied on Mar. 13, 2011 @ 09:14 GMT

I don’t wait for posts, so the reply was not quick.

Thank you for the right critic – review – because I think that the theories are invariant under praise, and I must improve the form and the contents.

I intended to write the Scheibe equation after someone read, and understand, my article:

$\odot \Psi = \frac{ c^4 }{ 16 \pi \kappa } \frac{ \partial^2 }{ \partial x^{l} \partial x^{m}} \left[ (g^{ik}g^{lm}-g^{il}g^{km})\Psi]$

to the infinity it is possible the commutation between metric tensor and derivative, so that one obtain the WDW equation (that seem a cosmologic solution).

I try, in this moment, the Einstein equations for stationary state (stationary particles), without momentum (Landau calculus): I obtain a new solution for Schwarzschild metric; I obtain some strange result for Friedman metric: three momentum exist in a stationary state: I must verify but it seem that there are rotation, and radial translation, without time variation of the metric: it is possible the metric-spin? There is not metric left-right symmetry?

I loose many time to look for a publication in scientific review, and I see with interest in this community of equals, where the community select the article; but it is important even the participation, if there are community member that read, and concur, to the essay.