Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

marco sanchez: on 5/18/18 at 9:10am UTC, wrote I really like and appreciated your post. I read deeply your article, the...

Edwin Klingman: on 3/12/11 at 20:55pm UTC, wrote Irvon, I enjoyed your essay and can add little to the above comments. Your...

Constantinos Ragazas: on 3/11/11 at 3:24am UTC, wrote Dear Irvon, Energy quanta are a think of the past! We need “A World...

Anonymous: on 3/9/11 at 18:02pm UTC, wrote Paul, I appreciate your comments. I have read your essay and I will...

Paul Halpern: on 3/8/11 at 22:42pm UTC, wrote Dear Irvon, The questions you raise are intriguing. It is impressive that...

Irvon Clear: on 2/15/11 at 17:50pm UTC, wrote Georgina, Thanks for your comments. I read your essay and I agree with...

Georgina Woodward: on 2/13/11 at 10:04am UTC, wrote Dear Irvon, I wanted to let you know that I have read you essay. (Just...

Georgina Woodward: on 2/13/11 at 9:33am UTC, wrote Thank you Peter. Certainly what is meant by the term "reality" is a good...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "I suggested the turnstiles separate odd form even numbered tickets randomly..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "Robert, I'm not sure that the 'thing as it is' is irrelevant. I can..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Robert McEachern: "Eckard, "You referred to..." I was referring only to my final comments..." in First Things First: The...

Robert McEachern: "Eckard, One Objection. Don't blame Fourier: his original series is..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "this second law is so important,my theory of spherisation and these quantum..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "I must explain what is the real meaning of Spherisation in my theory.It is..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 17, 2019

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: Something Else of Course! by Irvon Eugene Clear [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Irvon Eugene Clear wrote on Feb. 8, 2011 @ 12:45 GMT
Essay Abstract

A question establishes existence(digital). An answer creates an experience(analog). This essay attempts to demonstrate both.

Author Bio

I am a nontraditional student, an MBA graduate, a professional electrical engineer, a University of Phoenix faculty member and a hospital facility manager. I have completed eight plays and published a novel: "The Game: Part One." I was nominated for Georgia Author of the Year in 2004. My novel is currently listed on 800 CEO Read.com as a recommended read to top CEO’s because it contains “great ideas.” Imagine…an erotic novel containing great ideas! My first play Court of Priests was performed as a staged reading by Cincinnati Playwrights Initiative in Cincinnati on 1/11/11.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 9, 2011 @ 00:43 GMT
Dear Irvon

A nice fresh and concise approach. I couldn't help getting a feeling about apriory knowledge and was reminded of the next step, leading to Einstein's comment that the answers are so much easier to find when you know what you're looking for.

I suppose we should also be asking what 'reality' really is - actually Georgina did, and well.

Best of Luck.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Feb. 13, 2011 @ 09:33 GMT
Thank you Peter.

Certainly what is meant by the term "reality" is a good starting point for answering "is reality digital or analogue/", imo. There is a wide range of opinion on the matter from the essays I have read. Some considering quantum quasi reality or non physical reality alone to be the "real" reality. Others accept space-time as complete reality without any questions regarding its completeness or the paradoxes it entails. Some consider reality to be some kind of virtual simulation others more of a dream experience or self generated illusion.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Irvon Eugene Clear wrote on Feb. 9, 2011 @ 15:01 GMT
Thanks for your remarks Peter. Yes, I am comfortable with the claim that in order for the potential of existence for all possible objects, forces and relationships not a part of God to exist there must be knowledge of what those potential objects, forces and relationships actually are. My comfort comes from my assumption that the "potential" was actually created by an omniscient being...God. The objective that follows my assumption is discovering what was created in our sensory environment that then resulted in the existence of the actual potential for the existence of all possible objects, forces and relationships not a part of God to exist. What creates the evolving list of zeroes?

If we accept the idea that potential exists in our sensory environment then what measures its magnitude? What measures all of the potential in our universe? After this discovery the next objective will be to determine if the measurement of potential is the same thing as the creation of potential.

Again, thanks for you remarks.

Irvon

Bookmark and Share



Georgina Woodward wrote on Feb. 13, 2011 @ 10:04 GMT
Dear Irvon,

I wanted to let you know that I have read you essay. (Just thought I ought to reply to Peter as he had mentioned my essay.)Your essay was concise but did deal with the competition question in a unique and interesting way. It was a little surprising and puzzling but I also found some common ground.

I agree that the aspect of continuous change or transition is often overlooked. We do live in a world where things are categorized and counted and labeled. Your ones. Which emphasizes separateness and seems to give a digital identity to that world. The continuous changes and impermanence is somehow sidelined.(I found your reference to this as zeros a little odd but I think I grasped your meaning when you talked of the zeros always becoming ones.) Continuous transition becomes more apparent with the increasing speed of change as technology advances, fashion in all things seems ever more ephemeral and global warming and increasing environmental change is brought to our attention.

I agree that reality does seem to encompass both a digital and an analogue aspect.One might say matter( things) is digital but energy (change) is analogue. I found the concluding question a little strange but I will think about it.

Kind regards, Georgina.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Irvon Eugene Clear replied on Feb. 15, 2011 @ 17:50 GMT
Georgina,

Thanks for your comments. I read your essay and I agree with Peter...you did an excellent job of addressing reality within the context of physics.

My interest in the term reality comes from a belief that a simple question (Does it exist?) is the fundamental statement that begins an explanation for the existence of everything. I am still "discovering" the universe with the consequences of answering that question.

Your essay has generated a lot of interest. Best of luck.

Irvon

Bookmark and Share



Paul Halpern wrote on Mar. 8, 2011 @ 22:42 GMT
Dear Irvon,

The questions you raise are intriguing. It is impressive that you have a background in engineering, yet have completed eight plays and a novel. Interesting that you draw connections between science and human experience!

Best wishes,

Paul

Paul Halpern, The Discreet Charm of the Discrete

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Mar. 9, 2011 @ 18:02 GMT
Paul,

I appreciate your comments. I have read your essay and I will respond to it with some questions on your site. My perspective is that the human form defines a common sensory ability to explore and understand the environment that contains it. This collective ability has evolved the human experience that has then evolved science. If the human form vanishes from the universe then the science that has evolved from it will also vanish. Not affecting the universe, just the ability to understand it in human terms.

Irvon

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Constantinos Ragazas wrote on Mar. 11, 2011 @ 03:24 GMT
Dear Irvon,

Energy quanta are a think of the past! We need “A World Without Quanta”! And you can make that critical difference to help bring it about. Cast your approval for a world that makes sense and bring this essay out of the cusp of 'being or not being'! The results are deeply significant and totally iconoclastic. But we need to bring this essay to the 'church' on time! You among others will be better for it!

All the best,

Constantinos

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Mar. 12, 2011 @ 20:55 GMT
Irvon,

I enjoyed your essay and can add little to the above comments. Your use of zero and one to signify 'coming into existence' is interesting [if I've got it right.] And as Paul said, you do have a unique background you bring to bear.

Your Feb. 9, 2011 @ 15:01 GMT answer above to Peter describes your focus in this matter. I suggest that if you read my essay you consider it from the same perspective. In other words, I begin with the initial 'zero' becoming 'one' AND ONLY ONE! And from this potential evolve the world we live in today.

I hope you find a chance to read it and comment.

Best wishes,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


marco sanchez wrote on May. 18, 2018 @ 09:10 GMT
I really like and appreciated your post. I read deeply your article, the points you have mentioned in this article are useful.

gta 5 cheats

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.