Dear Patricio Valdes-Marin
You have written a very nice essay. In fact, your biggest mistake was to leave your name off of the paper. I had to go back to fqxi to find your name!
Most of your statements I believe to be true, and I think that you have partitioned reality in a very useful way.
You reasonably consider 'corpuscles' as 'mass points' (without internal structure) and therefore require two or more corpuscles to generate a structure. I believe that the fundamental particles have toroidal structure, and this would imply that even one particle generates structure. I have a strong preference for starting the universe with 'one' thing, not 'two' things, if at all possible.
Also you state that 'all of the forces in the universe come from fundamental particles." I believe that the primordial field of gravity initially acted only upon itself before condensing into the fundamental particles, neutrino, electron, and quarks. You seem to agree somewhat in your statement that the big bang began with 'energy' before condensing into particles.
These are small points, and generally support your arguments.
I find your partitioning very effective in terms of hierarchical scales of complexity, of cause and effect, and of indeterminism at any scale resolved by statistical determinism at a higher scale, among other things.
The concepts of force and structure make necessary the recognition of complexity, and you rightly develop the obvious conclusion that man is the most complex structure in the universe. Galaxies pale in comparison to a man. This focus on complexity exhibits the moral and spiritual bankruptcy of those who agree with Stephen Hawking that "The human race is just chemical scum on a moderate sized planet."
One wonders how 'big numbers' of corpuscles came in some people's minds to outweigh structural complexity.
So congratulations on a well thought out, well written analysis of a 'scale-independent' approach to the universe.
Good luck in the contest.
Edwin Eugene Klingman