Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Ivy Harris: on 4/24/17 at 15:18pm UTC, wrote Interesting. Also remember reading an essay on the reason we look for...

william steinback: on 5/15/16 at 3:56am UTC, wrote I am very excited to have found this site. I was just given a fascinating...

Peter Jackson: on 3/12/11 at 17:23pm UTC, wrote Richard A fascinating essay with a fresh view. I was particularly taken...

Richard Dolan: on 2/7/11 at 21:28pm UTC, wrote basudeba, The "fundamental principles" of physics are not static. They...

basudeba: on 2/6/11 at 15:42pm UTC, wrote Dear Sir, Kindly forgive our asking some elementary questions. But these...

Tommaso Bolognesi: on 1/25/11 at 18:16pm UTC, wrote Dear Richard, there seems to be a habit for earlier essay submitters to...

Richard Dolan: on 1/24/11 at 14:56pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract In support of the assertion that reality is digital...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "Thanks for sharing Georgina,it is nice.Friendly" in Alternative Models of...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Lorraine Ford: "With the “A.I. Feynman” software, Silviu-Marian Udrescu and Max Tegmark..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Georgina Woodward: "Coin toss co-state potentials: With the measurement protocol decided, in..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "If we correlate with the consciousness, can we consider that all is..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Ian Durham, Maybe still for the rankings and the links with this..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 22, 2019

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: A Model for Digital Reality by Richard P Dolan [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Jan. 24, 2011 @ 14:56 GMT
Essay Abstract

In support of the assertion that reality is digital and not analog, this essay presents a discrete spacetime model that reproduces all of the phenomenology of the stamdard models of particle physics and cosmology and points to physics beyond the standard models.

Author Bio

Dick Dolan is a retired electrical engineer and the former editor of the Hewlett-Packard Journal.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Member Tommaso Bolognesi wrote on Jan. 25, 2011 @ 18:16 GMT
Dear Richard,

there seems to be a habit for earlier essay submitters to welcome more recent contributors; I have just read the first page and a half of your essay and I am so pleased by some of the things you write, and by the style, that I want to be the first to say hi!

I'll come back with questions and comments later. Good luck!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


basudeba wrote on Feb. 6, 2011 @ 15:42 GMT
Dear Sir,

Kindly forgive our asking some elementary questions. But these are essential for our understanding or rather due to lack of it. Describing what space-time is, you have given some postulates. How do you derive them? Can they be derived from fundamental principles? If not, and if we follow your route of examining whether a particular analog or digital model explains what we observe, does not the argument become circular reasoning – you prove something based on a postulate and validate the postulate citing the same theory? This is all the more important because you have defined points, quantum numbers, void, etc. in a way that is different from the conventional method. Without addressing the above issue raised by us, the rest of the essay becomes unintelligible. Kindly clarify.

Regards,

basudeba.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Feb. 7, 2011 @ 21:28 GMT
basudeba,

The "fundamental principles" of physics are not static. They evolve as we learn more about our universe. When we realize that we don't know something we wish to know, we need to expand those fundamental principles. We can't do this by basing new theories on the same old principles. We need creative new assumptions, axioms, or postulates. These needn't be based on anything. They are the bases. The theories based on them should make predictions, and if the predictions are correct, the new postulates need to be taken seriously. If they survive test after test over time, they become fundamental principles and we have expanded our knowledge of the universe. That's what I'm aiming for here. I don't think my reasoning is circular, and while my points are unconventional, the model based on them makes known-correct predictions as well as new, testable predictions.

Bookmark and Share


william steinback replied on May. 15, 2016 @ 03:56 GMT
I am very excited to have found this site. I was just given a fascinating read... "Theory of Concepts" by Richard P Dolan, Oct 25 1965. I would say Richard Dolan was a little ahead of the curve. My wife found this collection of writings going through some of my father in laws papers. I don't think it was ever published as I have it, but a really great read so far. Richard, Gordy was a great man, I miss him.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 12, 2011 @ 17:23 GMT
Richard

A fascinating essay with a fresh view. I was particularly taken with your discrete points and self reproduction. I do the same, with some paralells, but with an astounding result.

I hope you have chance to read and score it, but you'l need good conceptual skills. http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/803

Best of Luck.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Ivy Harris wrote on Apr. 24, 2017 @ 15:18 GMT
Interesting. Also remember reading an essay on the reason we look for digital reality is the boredom of the actual world when working for http://essay-grader.com/ and the author of that essay said something like the world is only "boring" when you choose not to participate in living by joining forces with a consumption spending technologically driven virtual world. Human minds are still better than Google.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.