Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Constantinos Ragazas: on 3/14/11 at 0:27am UTC, wrote Dear Pierre, I found your essay interesting and thought provoking....

Peter Jackson: on 3/1/11 at 10:59am UTC, wrote Pierre I found your essay wonderfully refreshing and sensible. It follows...

Pierre Loty: on 1/31/11 at 17:27pm UTC, wrote I have read a number of posts pointing to the impossibilities inherent to...

Steve Dufourny: on 1/22/11 at 23:28pm UTC, wrote Hi dear Pierre Loty, You are welcome, with pleasure. Thank you...

Pierre Loty: on 1/21/11 at 15:31pm UTC, wrote Steve Dufourny Thank you for appreciating the universality or...

Pierre Loty: on 1/21/11 at 15:11pm UTC, wrote John, I really agree with Maid when he says from a practice-oriented...

Steve Dufourny: on 1/20/11 at 10:41am UTC, wrote Hello dear Pierre Loty, Nice to know you.I am happy to see scientists from...

John Merryman: on 1/20/11 at 3:36am UTC, wrote Pierre, Have you ever heard of Carver Mead? ...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "They are proud, because they have solved some problems, which are..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Robert McEachern: "Eckard, I do have an interest in the history, but not as much as I used..." in First Things First: The...

Georgina Woodward: "The Schrodinger's cat thought experiment presents 3 causally linked state..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Roger Granet: "Well put! Physics is hard, but biochemistry (my area), other sciences..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Georgina Woodward: "BTW The neck scarves are a promotional souvenir given out at non sports..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "lol Zeeya it is well thought this algorythm selective when names are put in..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "is it just due to a problem when we utilise names of persons?" in Mass–Energy Equivalence...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 18, 2019

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: Establishing Light As a Wave by Pierre Jean-Daniel Loty [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Pierre Loty wrote on Jan. 19, 2011 @ 15:48 GMT
Essay Abstract

Debates surrounding the nature of light are hardly settled. This work takes the issue to a multidisciplinary level in order to derive benefits from different yet relevant fields of study. The nature of light is wave. Light is interpreted as particle. Once the problematic hypothesis of an Intelligent Designer is allowed in, the answer flows trivially.

Author...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



John Merryman wrote on Jan. 20, 2011 @ 03:36 GMT
Pierre,

Have you ever heard of Carver Mead?

http://freespace.virgin.net/ch.thompson1/People/CarverM
ead.htm

He makes a similar argument and it is one I find interesting and useful.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steve Dufourny wrote on Jan. 20, 2011 @ 10:41 GMT
Hello dear Pierre Loty,

Nice to know you.I am happy to see scientists from Africa.

I congratulate you for your essay, it's a beautiful perception of our universe and its creations of evolution, of spherization.We see indeed the universality in your extrapolations, it's so important.

I see you studied in Cameroon.You can see on XING the group Africa united.Moderated by Kleber Biboum and its moderators.They are supers and their hearts is true and sincere.

I know some people there and everywhere in Africa.

In fact I TRY TO UNITE UNIVERSAL SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS.But it's not simple.

The speed of resolution will be increased of course if people works together for the well of our fellow man.

That's why I hope I will create the International Humanistic Sciences Center Named UNIFIED SPHERE soon.

A real scientific base of adapted productions can solve many problems.

The water, the food, the health,the education, the prosperity in first priority.

I have invented several models about ecology, as a sphere of composting, naturals filters for water,argilo humic complexs optimized,vegetal multiplication optimization,a technic global for the paludism,models of ecosystems improved,new photovoltaic cells, solar systems with mirrors and pression and volumes, ....the sciences at my humble opinion must act in a global point of vue of harmonization.

I wish you all the best in the contest and in your works.

Regards

Steve

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Pierre Loty wrote on Jan. 21, 2011 @ 15:11 GMT
John,

I really agree with Maid when he says from a practice-oriented scientist viewpoint that waves better explain natural phenomena than particles do. He views the electron as a wave-matter when he says the electron is its own conduit.

However, that simultaneity of properties is not simpler in essence. I be-lieve we could better understand distinct notions in the first place, with the possibility of mixing concepts intentionally in the second place.

In this line of reasoning, I would say the electron is a particle needing a conduit to flow. The example of the wave forming itself in the tennis ball’s trail shows that basically, waves come about when conditions are perturbed, as the milieu forces itself back into equilibrium. Concerning the wave and the electrons, I would say the attraction forcing the elec-tron in a given direction creates some disorder, be it an electrical disord-er or whatsoever. As the electron moves ahead, the preceding milieu it perturbed comes back into order and so forth, thus the wave. The wave could propagate forward without being reproduced and we wouldn’t get a current. But since scores of electrons are in motion, the wave effect is continuous, thus the current. So waves just pop up when conditions causing a particle to move are rebalancing.

Bookmark and Share



Author Pierre Loty wrote on Jan. 21, 2011 @ 15:31 GMT
Steve Dufourny

Thank you for appreciating the universality or fundamentality in my article.

I am happy to see how diverse the issues you tackle are. Of special inter-est are the environment-relevant devices and models you mentioned. The need is great to raise awareness concerning our growing responsibil-ity as we get stronger on planet earth.

Africa is to play an important role in this regard because much of what stuff we need to keep in check is found in Africa. So a real futuristic de-velopment model is potentially feasible in such unaltered areas.

I am happy to see that there are many African scientists here and I ap-preciate the precious work spearheaded by Kleber Biboum and others.

Bookmark and Share


Steve Dufourny replied on Jan. 22, 2011 @ 23:28 GMT
Hi dear Pierre Loty,

You are welcome, with pleasure.

Thank you also,indeed this responsability is so important, the good governance is the sister of the prosperity in an universal point of vue.

I beleive strongly in the potential of ecology.The CH4 like a future evidence and so on .

What I think very important is the mass of our ecosystems and its interactions.We must increase it.Everywhere in fact.

Indeed a real future model, universal is an evidence for our future if I can say.The nature has so many secrets , at this moment we loose our ecosystems.

The composting at big scale is a solution if the vegetal multiplication, the rational growth and interactions between animals and veg.are optimized with a optimized soil like a argilo humic complex and adds in correlations with some parameters of evolution and interactions.

After we utilise correctly the matetr ,C and N and we apply an exponential, which will permit to solve others weak ecosystems.

This technic is essential for a real stability of our global ecosystems.

After x times we have an optimized ecosystem with its productions of restabilization.(CH4,plants, fruits, meds,compost,food.....)

All in fact is purelly complementary.

Best regards and good luck in this contest.

Steve

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Pierre Loty wrote on Jan. 31, 2011 @ 17:27 GMT
I have read a number of posts pointing to the impossibilities inherent to an analog model of the universe. They emphasize that lengths are not made up of infinitely small points. It seems impossible to explain in analog terms how an object can make a very small step.

It is noteworthy that if the notion of point is adimensional, the notion of step, length or distance actually belongs to dimension 1. As soon as we reach a plane it becomes problematic; how to define the distance between say, a circle and a rectangle? The distance usually is not derived from the various distances between any point in the circle and any point in the rectangle. A preferred distance between two specific points from the two sets of points would be admitted. The problem is even more complicated in dimension three. Thus, distances hardly measure in 3-dimensional terms. We cannot therefore expect a concept barely surviving dimension 1 to explain the richer reality of object motion in dimension 3.

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 1, 2011 @ 10:59 GMT
Pierre

I found your essay wonderfully refreshing and sensible. It follows my own views which derive the particulate 'symmetry breaking' of light waves as effective the mechanism for change. My essay explains how this implements inertial frame transitions so is at the very heart of physics. I hope you may read mine (carefully!) and see the logic, that we might exchange the scores we deserve?, and possibly explore parallels. Do contact me on the email given, or if you follow the link to a couple of my papers referred under my essay it provides more logical support for your thesis.

Best wishes

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Constantinos Ragazas wrote on Mar. 14, 2011 @ 00:27 GMT
Dear Pierre,

I found your essay interesting and thought provoking. Certainly there continues to be much darkness about light. And the darkness divides thoughtful men into two opposing sides: wave vs. particle.

I tend to favor the continuous nature of Nature. My essay is premised on that. Using this view I have mathematically derived Planck's Law without needing energy quanta and have shown that this Law is actually a mathematical tautology that describes the interaction of measurement. I argue this is the real reason why the experimental blackbody spectrum is indistinguishable from the theoretical.

Furthermore, just two days ago I posted a result which you will find very significant. In this very short paper I give a mathematical proof of the proposition, “If the speed of light is constant, then light is a wave”.

I am striving to get these results before the 'panel' for a thorough review. I ask for your support in this effort as I am on the cusp of making it or not making it to the final round.

All the best with all your endeavors,

Constantinos

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.