Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Terry Padden: on 10/9/09 at 9:49am UTC, wrote James I agree with both your main points. Every resolution of a physics...

Eckard Blumschein: on 10/7/09 at 14:18pm UTC, wrote James, A Graber should be a digger, not a skimmer. Try to understand. ....

James Graber: on 10/5/09 at 10:55am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract We propose that just as Bell’s theorem made...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

John Cox: "Sorry, Georgina, I have had a busy summer and am racing the change of..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "If the Earth did not have it`s rotational motion, the apparent time of day..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Steve Dufourny: "Yes indeed the present seems the only one thing where we can insteract ,..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Stefan Weckbach: "Hi Lorraine, thanks for your reply. You are correct, that's what I was..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "John, Thank you for responding. I was hoping for evaluation of the..." in The Nature of Time

Lorraine Ford: "Stefan, First, one has to try to define the essential features of..." in The Present State of...

Lorraine Ford: "David and Kelvin, How would you describe consciousness, i.e. what are you..." in Consciousness and the...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello Daniele Oriti, I liked your approach for this quantum gravitation...." in The universe as a quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.


FQXi FORUM
September 25, 2021

CATEGORY: What's Ultimately Possible in Physics? Essay Contest (2009) [back]
TOPIC: Ultimately, Experimental Metaphysics Will Triumph by James Graber [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author James Graber wrote on Oct. 5, 2009 @ 10:55 GMT
Essay Abstract

We propose that just as Bell’s theorem made possible experimental tests of the Einstein Rosen Podolsky arguments as improved by Bohm, in the future decisive experimental tests will become possible for many of the currently contentious issues at the foundations of quantum mechanics. We predict that some of these experimental resolutions of previously metaphysical questions may come soon, partly as a byproduct of efforts to produce quantum computers, in particular one-way measurement-based computers, and partly as a result of directed efforts such as the attempts to produce ever larger macroscopic Schrodinger cats.

Author Bio

Jim Graber got an undergraduate degree in mathematics approximately fifty years ago and has been working with computers ever since. He has occasionally used computers to build models and study amenable physics problems. He currently reads the abstracts for GR-QC, HEP-EX, QUANT-PH and ASTRO-PH daily and typically skims about four physics papers each day.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Eckard Blumschein wrote on Oct. 7, 2009 @ 14:18 GMT
James,

A Graber should be a digger, not a skimmer. Try to understand. . Do you expect the LHC providing evidence for SUSY, and do you believe in quantum computers that will work as promised?

Eckard

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Terry Padden wrote on Oct. 9, 2009 @ 09:49 GMT
James

I agree with both your main points. Every resolution of a physics problem can only be achieved through data obtained from experiments. If we are to solve the ultimate problems of Emergence & Consciousness we must first have accurate relevant data. We are nearing the computational limits of today's computers. So achieving accuracy may become difficult. New computational machines (and algorithms) will be needed; and science will have to include Computer / Information Science as a fundamental discipline.

Two quibbles: (a) I would not term the problems "metaphysical"; (b) I am not convinced about "quantum" computers, for I share Laughlin's reservations. May be biological is the way to go.

My essay endorses the primacy of experimental data (I denote it "Reasonable") over (Rational) theoretical formulations.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.