Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Jayakar Joseph: on 10/20/09 at 14:32pm UTC, wrote Dear Lothar Schäfer, As the quantum physics itself is transitional...

amrit: on 10/9/09 at 10:15am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Lothar Observer is consistent part of science. Question is: Who...

Marcel-Marie LeBel: on 9/29/09 at 23:47pm UTC, wrote I like very much your essay. It makes a solid plea for the underlying...

Lothar Schafer: on 9/27/09 at 14:26pm UTC, wrote In response to the comment signed “Uncle Al”: I appreciate very much...

Uncle Al: on 9/25/09 at 19:02pm UTC, wrote "but they are transempirical, because observation destroys them." Double...

Lothar Schafer: on 9/25/09 at 11:42am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I explore the potential of quantum physics to...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "Eckard, "I just doubt that arbitrarily chosen phase reference... reflect..." in Dissolving Quantum...

Robert McEachern: "Stefan, "This would mean that a certain particle has some knowledge, some..." in Grants awarded for...

Stefan Weckbach: "Robert, yes, of course, infinitely many „betweens“ all the way down..." in Grants awarded for...

Eckard Blumschein: "Rob, You "do not believe that a (real-valued) cosine transform is more..." in Dissolving Quantum...

Lokesh Bisht: "Junk DNA is an unfortunate choice of name, since it immediately devalues..." in Are We Merging With Our...

Angels Vedas: "Beautifully designed Rose Quartz earrings drawn in sterling silver to bring..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Angels Vedas: "Throw away all your worries by putting on this handcrafted Azurite bracelet..." in Constructing a Theory of...

EthelL Marquez: "Looking for experienced lawyers Sydney CBD? Visit The Dymocks Building...." in Quantum Physics, Mini...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

Constructing a Theory of Life
An all-encompassing framework of physics could help to explain the evolution of consciousness, intelligence, and free will.

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.


FQXi FORUM
December 19, 2018

CATEGORY: What's Ultimately Possible in Physics? Essay Contest (2009) [back]
TOPIC: What is ultimately possible in Physics? Can Quantum Physics lead us to a Transempirical, Transmaterial and Transpersonal Domain of Physical Reality? by Lothar Schäfer [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Lothar Schafer wrote on Sep. 25, 2009 @ 11:42 GMT
Essay Abstract

I explore the potential of quantum physics to establish the existence of a domain of physical reality that transcends human experience. Such a transempirical domain is suggested by phenomena, which involve the superposition states of microphysical objects and the virtual states of atoms and molecules. Superposition states are real because they can manifest themselves in empirical phenomena, such as Single-Particle Interference, but they are transempirical, because observation destroys them. Virtual states are real because they can control empirical phenomena, such as spectroscopic transitions, but they are transempirical, because they are empty. In addition to being transempirical, the hidden domain of reality appears to be transmaterial and transpersonal. The appearance, in an empirical science, of a transempirical reality is of great significance and it is seen to engage physics in issues which have traditionally been outside of its domain.

Author Bio

Lothar Schäfer; PhD in Chemistry, University of Munich, 1965. Currently Distinguished Professor of Physical Chemistry at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Numerous publications in Electron Diffraction, Applied Quantum Chemistry, Computational Chemistry, combined ab initio-experimental studies of molecular structures. In the 1980s, he directed a team which developed the first real-time electron diffraction instrument, enabling Time-Resolved Electron Diffraction studies of laser-excited molecules (J. Phys. Chem., 98 (1994) 8673). First quantum chemical geometry determinations of peptides, predicting structural trends in proteins a decade before they were observed experimentally (J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 10521).

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Uncle Al wrote on Sep. 25, 2009 @ 19:02 GMT
"but they are transempirical, because observation destroys them." Double quantum eraser experiments. Deterministic collapse of a double slit pattern is undone by discarding information about the entities' passage. If the observation has "destroyed" something, why are its effects undone by forgetting the destruction was performed? Assuredly an observable resulting from quantum superposition collapse remains that same observable afterward when nobody is looking, right? Tell us how to reinflate the superposition from determined observables.

Explain the causality of double quantum eraser experiments given your thesis. Consider the quantum Zeno effect and Hund's Paradox with virtual states. As a chemist, do you really believe that a rigid polycyclic chiral molecule like (1S,2S)-bicyclo[2.2.l]hept-5-en-2-one, norbornenone, will spontaneously racemize in hard vacuum? If passed through a small shiny box with 2054.118 ohms dissipation? Tell us how a quantum superposition can rationalize a (1S,2R) or (1R,2S) superposition in additon to the classical (1R,2R) optical antipode.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/hund.htm

If is silly in glass it is silly on paper. In vitro veritas!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Lothar Schafer wrote on Sep. 27, 2009 @ 14:26 GMT
In response to the comment signed “Uncle Al”: I appreciate very much your criticism, whoever you may be, because it is a wonderful prompt to rephrase what I am trying to say and perhaps say it better.

What I am trying to say is what Werner Heisenberg expressed (loc. cit. 1962, 54) in this way: “The observation itself changes the probability function discontinuously; it selects of all...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Marcel-Marie LeBel wrote on Sep. 29, 2009 @ 23:47 GMT
I like very much your essay. It makes a solid plea for the underlying reality and the reason for our disregard of it in our human, instrumental and conceptual (materialistic) limitations. I consider your essay as a serious must introduction and complement to my own. I like your transition from actuality to potentiality.

Notes:

1- Nature squeezes existence in various ways, each constraint being represented by a quantum number. If we are the ones putting on the squeeze on nature, nature will exhibit also a temporary quantization in response. The double slit experiment is such an experimental constraint creating a temporary quantization of one property. Direction is the property here that is being constrained which results in the quantization of “direction”.

2- I agree that our experience is but our interaction with things. .. and the corruption you mention as caused by instruments is also effected by our own mind that is also an instrument. Science is empirical and it allows us to do all sort of marvelous things without knowing what we are really doing. This is because it examines the universe as a black box; poke and see the results. The behavior of the box is everything, but the actual existence of a content is ignored.

3- Once you agree to item 2 above, transempirical is not part of physical reality( by definition) It is “metaphysical”, a word that is still seen as "scandalous"...

4- In Quantum Mechanics we have made a trade for empirical reasons.

A higher probability of finding an object in one place in a specific amount of time is a direct ontological equivalent to this object actually spending more time on average in this place than anywhere else. For this longer stay to happen, the time rate -For this object- must be slower in that place.



Marcel,

(Hi! To Uncle Al… a long time critique)

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


amrit wrote on Oct. 9, 2009 @ 10:15 GMT
Dear Dr. Lothar

Observer is consistent part of science.

Question is: Who is the observer ?

I see self-observation and self-experience of the observer as a fundamental research of physics.

yours amrit

eternity is now

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Oct. 20, 2009 @ 14:32 GMT
Dear Lothar Schäfer,

As the quantum physics itself is transitional between continuum mechanics and quantum chemistry, any phenomenological variation in continuum mechanics is introspective to quantum chemistry with new principles and in the emerging new physics there are expectations on restructuring the atomic analogy evolved form Bohr model.

In a Coherent-cyclic cluster-matter universe model, as all matters of the universe are in dynamics, the existence of stationary state is not applicable and the state vector expression by wave function may be representational for event location rather than structural location as there is cyclic action of energy-mass transfer with the elements of matter matrix when there is cyclic wave propagation through matter matrix and this may be explainable in the phenomenology of Field-Ion Microscopy also.

The probable realism is by empirical rather than by transempirical phenomenon and the hidden variable is representational as energy-mass flux on transfer and may be expressional as symmetry transformation.

Though the definiteness and superposition exclude each other in quantum mechanics, they coexists in large structures, in that the embedded sub-structures are in a hierarchy of lattice with their coherent super-structures as the universe is a single structure of cluster-matter with embedded sub-cluster-matters and further sub-cluster-matters. In this context, the transempirical phenomenon in quantum mechanics that relates transmaterial probabilities in quantum chemistry described in this article is much consistent on quantum chemistry with quantum physics to explore physical reality, thanking you ..

With best wishes,

Jayakar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.