Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Antony Lisi: on 5/14/07 at 19:04pm UTC, wrote I am poor, but hunting down errors is important to me -- and I could use...

Antony Lisi: on 5/3/07 at 20:34pm UTC, wrote Throughout his or her tortured existence, a mathematical physicist has two...


Robert McEachern: ""At least that's the premise." That's the problem. "the theorems that..." in Alternative Models of...

Malcolm Riddoch: "@Robert: ""This latter, Ψ(U), can't describe a 'drug test' can it?" For..." in Alternative Models of...

John Cox: "Lorraine, I briefly described the relationship of mass to inertia..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "John, I would say that you need to think what you mean by “physical..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "Re "I tend to speed-read then review before scoring after reading a good..." in Undecidability,...

John Cox: "George, We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

John Cox: "Georgi, by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel,..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

January 24, 2020

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Help Fight Negativity! [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger Antony Garrett Lisi wrote on May. 3, 2007 @ 20:34 GMT
Throughout his or her tortured existence, a mathematical physicist has two mortal enemies. These enemies are battled constantly, strike at any moment, and can merely wound or actually kill vast swaths of calculations. Here is one:


and here is the other:


Yes, they are small. But they are mighty. It is their tiny stature that often leads to their deadly effectiveness -- for they are sneaky. And they must be controlled. If one appears in the wrong place, or disappears from the right place, it spawns errors in every subsequent expression until its victory over the theorist is immortalized in publication.

OK, so, big deal, a few "-" here and there can't be that hard to keep track of, even if one does tend to juggle several in the head at once during a calculation, right? How many are we talking about? I just did a search through my notes at Deferential Geometry... There are currently 2,277 "-" living there.


Sure, some of these are hyphens so they don't count. But still, that's a lot of potential evil, lurking. The odds of 2,277 irascible "-" all being in the right place at the right time... well, it saddens me to think about how small (or even negative?) that probability is.

So I'm offering a bounty!

$100 to the first person to find three initial appearances (or disappearances ) of a malicious "-" at Deferential Geometry.

The restrictions:

1) You have to correctly identify the root cause, where a mistaken sign first occurs -- its dependents don't count.

2) It has to be an actual mistake, not due to a difference of opinion or convention.

3) A mistake in a note tagged with a "0" is only worth half, since those are often rough or incomplete calculations.

Please post a comment here if you think you've spotted one or several of the enemy. (Describe the note and the erroneous expression in it.) If it's a mistake, you get the credit for finding it first even if you weren't sure about it. The victor will be heralded and sent $100 from me via paypal.

A suggestion: If you have to argue to make your case, you're probably wasting time. Out of 2,277 signs, I'm sure I just plain dropped some in calculations. But feel free to ask.

Once this bounty is claimed, we'll talk about the 2,428 2's...

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Blogger Antony Garrett Lisi wrote on May. 14, 2007 @ 19:04 GMT
I am poor, but hunting down errors is important to me -- and I could use the help. So I just upped the bounty to $100.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.