Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Maria Odete Madeira: on 3/6/10 at 10:09am UTC, wrote ...The identity of the organism does not depend upon the organism’s...

Cristi Stoica: on 7/10/09 at 16:37pm UTC, wrote Strange, but inevitable consequences of human simulations Sooner or later...

Zeeya Merali: on 3/9/09 at 6:16am UTC, wrote Given the chance, would you back-up your “mind-files” on a computer, to...


Stefan Weckbach: "Oops, "survival is logically favoured over distinction" should read ..." in The Present State of...

Stefan Weckbach: "Hi Lorraine, thanks for your reply and your honest answer. I agree with..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "Done." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "Excuse me, my previous post is in error." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Georgina Woodward: "Vesuvius Now, thank you so much for watching and your feedback. I will make..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "Had we evolved on the dark side of the Moon, we would not see the Earth. ..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

click titles to read articles

Good Vibrations
Microbead 'motor' exploits natural fluctuations for power.

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

October 17, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Universe of Possibilities: Backing-Up Your Brain [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Mar. 9, 2009 @ 06:16 GMT
Image courtesy Melanie Swan
Given the chance, would you back-up your “mind-files” on a computer, to keep your memories in pristine condition? Or agree to become a computer hybrid to enhance your experience of life? Those were some of the questions posed by science and technology futurist Melanie Swan at Sunday’s brainstorming session entitled “What Can Technology Ultimately Make Possible and What are the Ultimate Possibilities for Life?”

At the moment, the best computer (IBM’s Roadrunner) still only processes information at 5% of the rate of the human brain. But while the human brain has taken hundreds of thousands of years to evolve, Moore’s Law tells us that the capacity of computers doubles every 18 months or so. Futurist Ray Kurzweil goes as far as to suggest that by 2018, a supercomputer will be able to emulate a human brain, Swan told us.

So, she asked, will people soon be backing-up their brains? Would you want to back-up your brain? (I voted “no.” This could take identity theft to a whole new level.)

Biotechnology speeds up faster than Moore’s Law, said Swan (12 months versus 18 months) and could lead to the promise of learning how to fight disease, perhaps one day giving us the potential for eternal life. (“We could live forever, but only if the machines will let us,” commented MIT’s Seth Lloyd.)

Swan envisages a much less confrontational future between humans and machines, not so much a Terminator-style rise of the machine, more a melding of the two entities. “Life and technology are thought of as separate, but they could come together,” said Swan. She spoke of “trans-humans“--human-machine hybrids that are far more advanced than current humans--and “post-humans,” who have developed so far beyond our current capabilities that they must be considered a different species. (There are more details in Swan’s presentation slides, here.)

Melding with machines may sound like sci-fi, but Swan pointed out that “we’re already cyborgs,” that is, 10% of people in the US have inorganic implants, such as hip replacements.

Cosmologist Andrei Linde was quite taken with the idea, imagining a future where he could outsource tasks so that he could enjoy life experiences he otherwise wouldn’t have time for. “I could outsource them and have the signal of happiness sent back to my brain.”

“The only price you’d have to pay would be to view ads from Google--which by now would be played _inside_ your brain,” quipped Lloyd.

Also looking to the future, Frank Wilczek expanded on his ideas from the start of the conference that physics and its applications need to be more biology-like.

Frank Wilczek (photo by Andrei Linde)
Wilczek pointed out that in biology, geography often drives speciation as organisms adapt to new climates. “I think there’s a vast region of space to which we’re poorly adapted, but man-machine hybrids--in some sense our children--might feel at home there.”

Wojciech Zurek took Wilczek’s idea a step further and asked whether physical laws are really set in stone, or whether physicists should take the lead from biology and think more in terms of evolving laws. “The multiverse and the string theory landscape lend themselves to the language of biology,” he said.

Bruce McWilliams, chairman of Tessera Technologies, looked at how the work done by humans has evolved over the centuries. In the 1800s, 90% of work was on the farm. With industrialization, the workforce moved into factories. By 2000, most jobs were in the service and information industry, as machines have been developed to carry out most of the heavy-lifting. But even now, we’re seeing machines taking over a lot of the simplest service jobs, allowing us to check-in at airports, for instance.

“As technology improves, what will everyone do?” he asked. “I guess everyone will have to become theoretical physicists!”

Referring back to Wilczek and Swan’s ideas about machine’s becoming more human-like, he added: “I’m not a big fan of making computers more like humans. I want computers to do what people don’t want to do. It’s not clear to me that we need more people. We already have 6.7 billion and they aren’t doing much good!”

Lloyd was sceptical that we will see such huge advances in computing, to the point that computers could become a threat. “Remember, we built a computer that could beat the world chess champion before we built a machine that could vacuum a room. We thought vacuuming was a simple task, but it turned out to be complex. Computers are a million times more advanced, but they aren’t a million times more useful; Windows takes longer to boot!”

Lloyd closed the discussion by running through the current state of quantum computing. He then turned to its future. Its very very distant future. Thanks to dark energy, which is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate, the future will be quite lonely for our galaxy, as other galaxies are pulled far beyond us, leaving us largely isolated.

In such a scenario, Lloyd wondered what would happen to life, assuming that life (although perhaps not human life) would last forever. A quick calculation showed that a quantum computer could keep processing information in the galaxy (as long as it didn’t dissipate its energy over time, in correcting for errors) pretty much forever. To be honest, I’m not quite sure what that showed--I think that it showed any life forms out there cursed to live forever won’t get bored, perhaps. (Perhaps Seth Lloyd can tell me what he meant.)

Image source: and Melanie Swan

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the forum administrator

Cristi Stoica wrote on Jul. 10, 2009 @ 16:37 GMT
Strange, but inevitable consequences of human simulations

Sooner or later there will run on computers human simulations so realistic made, that cannot be distinguished from humans. Then, I think that some developments will follow inevitably.

Stage 1: human simulations

- Some humans will believe that the human simulations are functionally identical to real human...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Maria Odete Madeira wrote on Mar. 6, 2010 @ 10:09 GMT
...The identity of the organism does not depend upon the organism’s memories. Even if an organism “loses” its memories, that organism is still an irreducible referent as presence and existence in the world.

About the download of memories… it is important to remember that a memory incorporates, always, cognitive syntheses in which protoconscious and conscious processes intervene.

Also, any conscious process is constituted, in its formative basis, by emotions and feelings. The emulation of a brain, postulated by the transhumanist business, does not capture the nature of human cognition. The brain is not the key, but the whole system.

Concepts are being used as catchphrases for selling technological products.

Transhumanism is a badly thought out word… human transcendence does not mean a change of nature, it means to go beyond the human limits without the negation of the human…, in the human, still human.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.