Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Steve Esser: on 3/25/09 at 17:25pm UTC, wrote Dr. Aguirre: I'm an investor and I think your analogy is basically sound. ...

Anthony Aguirre: on 3/18/09 at 16:45pm UTC, wrote A few comments: First, Zeeya, thanks for these very nice blog entries that...

Zeeya Merali: on 3/7/09 at 5:13am UTC, wrote Much of Friday was spent discussing the direction in which FQXi should move...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Jim, yes it is in the present, the present is important, we exist in..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, When light leaves the Sun, it does so in the present. ..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Stefan Weckbach: "Unfortunately there is not much participation here on this site. So it..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "Marcel, John, what do you think of the arguments I have presented?" in The Nature of Time

Lorraine Ford: "P.S. No matter what mathematicians do (and no matter what complexity..." in The Present State of...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello Daniele Oriti, I liked your approach for this quantum gravitation...." in The universe as a quantum...

Lorraine Ford: "David and Kelvin, But what IS consciousness? I would say that the..." in Consciousness and the...

Lorraine Ford: "Markus, I think you are over complexifying everything. I can only repeat..." in The Room in the Elephant:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.


FQXi BLOGS
September 24, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Universe of Possibilities: A Paradigm Shift in Funding Physics? * [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Mar. 7, 2009 @ 05:13 GMT
Much of Friday was spent discussing the direction in which FQXi should move in the future. FQXi directors Max Tegmark and Anthony Aguirre described some of the successes of FQXi and set up brainstorming sessions between physicists and philanthropists to try and think of new ways to fund foundational research.

On the success front, Aguirre highlighted the Nature of Time essay contest, which...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the forum administrator



FQXi Administrator Anthony Aguirre wrote on Mar. 18, 2009 @ 16:45 GMT
A few comments:

First, Zeeya, thanks for these very nice blog entries that give some flavor of the proceedings at the meeting. And thanks Andrei for many of the beautiful pictures!

Second, true to my word (I can't believe there was every any doubt...) we really did announce the essay contest winners; see the page here: http://fqxi.org/community/essay/winners.

Third, a comment on what FQXi funds. As Max suggested, FQXi instructs the panels to consider the *product* of the (chance of success)x(impact if successful). In fact, FQXi goes further and divides this by (cost of project). Thus we want to maximize the (in phyisics lingo) 'expectation value of impact per dollar'.

I would say that this is not, in general, how other science funding agencies do things in reality, though of course some of the same considerations come in to any grantmaking agency. While I concur with Fred that a 'business model' has corrupted some/much of the academic research and funding model, at the same time a 'investment model' is not really used in funding.

That is, investors have a portfolio with high-risk high-return as well as low-risk, low-return investments. Whether by intention or not, large funding agencies often tend to allocate rather strongly in low-risk. (In fact I've read somewhere that academics in their actual investments tend to be strongly risk-averse on the whole.) We see FQXI's mission, in part, to represent a high-risk, high-return portion of the research funding portfolio. That is, we're experimenting with being venture capitalists in big questions. It would be great to get some input from actual investors (or venture capitalists) to see how we could do it better!

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the forum administrator



Steve Esser wrote on Mar. 25, 2009 @ 17:25 GMT
Dr. Aguirre: I'm an investor and I think your analogy is basically sound. I don't have any direct experience with the world of science funding, but from everything I have heard it makes sense that fqxi can help fulfill the higher risk/higher reward role.

Best regards, - Steve Esser

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.