Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Gerry Klein: on 1/2/09 at 0:13am UTC, wrote Daniel; Yes, I think there is common ground. Gerry Iacob Sute; The...

Iacob Sute: on 12/15/08 at 14:31pm UTC, wrote I am a little bit confused by "Motion Of Nothing", perhaps you could...

Daniel Kunau: on 12/4/08 at 16:29pm UTC, wrote Very interesting read. This has a lot in common with my theory of time...

Gerry L. Klein: on 12/3/08 at 10:04am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract This presentation will address the fundamental...


Dr Narayan Bhadra : "For the explanation of Gravitational forces we need to go beyond the..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Dr Narayan Bhadra : "STRUCTURE FORMATION OF BIO-ELEMENTS Dr. Narayan Kumar Bhadra Lakshmipur..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Ulla Mattfolk: "In a statement posted on its website on 27 June, SNRIU said that "due to..." in Global Collaboration

Ulla Mattfolk: "Cont. Of the nuclear countries Sweden and Germany has said no thanks, they..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "Jonathan Dickau ,hope you are well, always cool to have your points of vue,..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

Steve Dufourny: "This platform is about theoretical physics, it is irritating to have these..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

Steve Dufourny: "I recommand this you tube of Professor Ellis about mind, intelligence,..." in George Ellis - How can...

Steve Dufourny: "irritating these posts, they shall disappear simply because under review..." in George Ellis - How can...

click titles to read articles

The Math of Consciousness: Q&A with Kobi Kremnitzer
A meditating mathematician is developing a theory of conscious experience to help understand the boundary between the quantum and classical world.

Can We Feel What It’s Like to Be Quantum?
Underground experiments in the heart of the Italian mountains are testing the links between consciousness and collapse theories of quantum physics.

The Thermodynamic Limits of Intelligence: Q&A with David Wolpert
Calculating the energy needed to acquire and compute information could help explain the (in)efficiency of human brains and guide the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence.

Gambling Against the Second Law
Using precision thermometry to make mini heat engines, that might, momentarily, bust through the thermodynamic limit.

Mind and Machine: What Does It Mean to Be Sentient?
Using neural networks to test definitions of 'autonomy.'

June 30, 2022

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: The Foundation of Physics and the Explanation of Time by Gerry L. Klein [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Gerry L. Klein wrote on Dec. 3, 2008 @ 10:04 GMT
Essay Abstract

This presentation will address the fundamental problem that is preventing the meaningful resolution of the presently conflicting views held by experts and layman alike on the foundational problems facing science, religion, and philosophy. Within such a broad realistic framework the exact nature of time can be easily explained. However it appears that the nature of the problem is such that the answer that will be presented is not meaningful and cannot be made meaningful to people operating under the foundational principle here in explained as erroneous. The new principle must be seen in its own light not in the reflected light of an erroneous principle. Put another way each person must prove it out for himself or herself or the following happens. Galileo, " I don't need to look through your telescope because I KNOW what you are claiming is wrong". The proof offered here will be a re-interpretation of the observed results of the Michaelson-Morley interferometer of 1887. This relevant quote by Albert Szent-Gyorgyi sums it up; "Thus the task is not to see what no one else has seen but to think differently about that which everyone sees."

Author Bio

My name is Gerry Klein and I am 63 years old, married, with 3 sons and I have just recently retired after working for the last 44 years as a longshoreman on the Vancouver waterfront. This I thought would only be a temporary job while I struggled to establish the truth of life for myself so that I could then go on to earn a living doing something, I had not idea what, that would be fun, enjoyable and at the same time useful. The main ideas contained in this essay are the results so far.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

Daniel Kunau wrote on Dec. 4, 2008 @ 16:29 GMT
Very interesting read. This has a lot in common with my theory of time (Time acording to dano, 45 down from yours or 87 up from first, posted 12-1 10:53) except for the cause. I propose time is not V=S/T but is

Bookmark and Share

Iacob Sute wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 14:31 GMT
I am a little bit confused by "Motion Of Nothing", perhaps you could describe this notion a little more ?

Bookmark and Share

Gerry Klein wrote on Jan. 2, 2009 @ 00:13 GMT

Yes, I think there is common ground.


Iacob Sute;

The motion of something is the movement of physical objects. The "Motion of Nothing" is the constant outward progression of both Space and Time. Both progressions are constantly ongoing and are united as motion according to the formula V=S/T. The same formula used to analyze the motion of objects. This progression of motion, the progression of time and space cannot be physically sensed at this most basic level of motion because there is "Nothing Moving" no physical object to show this movement. It must be inferred as existing by the strange result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. This motion is the most fundamental existent of the universe and is the expansion (progression) outward of space and time at the speed of light from all locations whether occupied (by objects) or not! This progression, which is motion, is INDEPENDENT OF OBJECTS. That makes it absolute and a moving frame of reference that can be used to relate accurately all the relative motions of the physical objects of the universe. Science has detected the movement of galaxies rushing outward away from our location and has correctly inferred that it is the space that is rushing away and carrying the galaxies with it. This is the physical evidence of the progression of space outward far away from us. We do not sense the space expansion here because "gravity" holds it so to speak stationary in the close vicinity of earth. However because of the reciprocal nature of space and time in motion the opposite condition will apply to time. Time we will sense as rushing, progressing, "moving" by us here. The closest explanation is that this concept "the Motion of Nothing Moving" is equivalent to the introduction of the Zero Concept into Mathematics the concept of nothing.

Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.