Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Daniel Barton: on 7/6/17 at 9:15am UTC, wrote In my opinion, the observations must meet with end results and data must be...

Amsterdam: on 12/30/09 at 6:45am UTC, wrote From a cursory read of many of the essays, Vinson seems to me to be the...

Eckard Blumschein: on 3/12/09 at 16:02pm UTC, wrote I appreciate the jury for causing me to read the essay by Barbour and for...

C. Vinson: on 12/3/08 at 10:04am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The orthodox perspective on the arrow of time...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Lorraine, I agree with your first sentence. An agent is enabled or..." in Agency in the Physical...

Georgina Woodward: "John, you are changing two aspects of the experiment in addition to..." in Physics of the Observer...

Lorraine Ford: "How not wonderful, how evil and oppressive, is a universe where your fate..." in Agency in the Physical...

Adam paul: "The printer is the most useful gadget that uses mostly every day. But..." in The Quantum...

Joe Fisher: "Georgina, as there am only one single VISIBLE infinite surface eternally..." in Why This Universe?

Georgina Woodward: "Joe, the appearance depends upon the sensory system of the observer..." in Why This Universe?

kurt stocklmeir: "gravity associated with gas and gas running into stars can change orbit of..." in Alternative Models of...

Patrik Miertviezky: "Hello everybody! My name is Patrik and i am 26 years old girl from Europe...." in Time in Physics & Entropy...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.


FQXi FORUM
June 24, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Quantum Measurement as an Arrow of Time by C. Vinson [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

C. Vinson wrote on Dec. 3, 2008 @ 10:04 GMT
Essay Abstract

The orthodox perspective on the arrow of time originating from entropy suggests it comes about from an initial condition on the universe. I explore the possibility of a different arrow of time originating from the behavior of measurements in quantum mechanics and its connection with the thermodynamic arrow, as well as building an analogy between the decoherence perspective on quantum measurement and the arguments that place the thermodynamic arrow as an initial condition. Together, these ideas suggest two alternative possibilities for physics: one where quantum measurement introduces a time-reversal asymmetry in the dynamics of physical law, and another where the universe started in a particular state that creates both the quantum measurement and thermodynamic arrows. Finally, I argue there's no a priori reason to prefer one of these perspectives over the other given the current state of experiment and theory, so the neglect of the former in favor of the latter is not justified.

Author Bio

C. Vinson developed an interest in physics, particularly the physics of time, at an early age and followed it as far as graduate school at the University of Maryland; but decided not to pursue theoretical physics as a career and now matriculates at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, studying library and information science.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Eckard Blumschein wrote on Mar. 12, 2009 @ 16:02 GMT
I appreciate the jury for causing me to read the essay by Barbour and for excluding matters of belief. While I still consider unjustified any denial of time and of the restriction of reality to the past, Barbour might be correct in that already elapsed time can be reduced to something more fundamental. It is on its turn more fundamental as compared to the usual abstract notion of time, but it is an integral of coincidences. I would like to thank McGucken for pointing me to Minkowski who wrote the fourth dimension ict.

At the moment I cannot see any useful application of Barbour's insight that time might be not a most fundamental quantity.

On the other hand, consequent distinction between past and future seems to be overdue.

Bookmark and Share



Amsterdam wrote on Dec. 30, 2009 @ 06:45 GMT
From a cursory read of many of the essays, Vinson seems to me to be the only one furthering the discussion about time in a truly meaningful way. It is clear that any interference with the wave function introduces entropy, thereby forcing the wave to break down into constituent "parts" and subjecting it to the "arrow of time." In this way, the arrow of time is inescapable for matter, but not an inherent part of quantum reality. Pretty simple. Why isn't science pursuing this angle with more vigor?

Bookmark and Share



Daniel Barton wrote on Jul. 6, 2017 @ 09:15 GMT
In my opinion, the observations must meet with end results and data must be collected in order to form a theory, then we'll see if that theory can jibe with the cosmological constant. I read very interesting theory at http://customwritingcompany.com/blog/ where scholar contrasts decoherence perspective with arguments on thermodynamic arrow.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.