Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Amanda Leon: on 1/30/18 at 7:17am UTC, wrote Planck time, an extremely small amount of time, is usually considered the...

Guenter Hauser: on 12/2/08 at 14:31pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The twin paradox where two persons can age at...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Having a number of events that measure out the duration does depend upon..." in Understanding...

Georgina Woodward: "Time is not a foundational aspect of the material world. Change/happening/..." in Understanding...

Stefan Weckbach: "According to the paper linked in the article, Tejinder Singh's explanatory..." in Towards the unification...

Lorraine Ford: "No matter what the variables are, e.g. the energy or position variables,..." in Towards the unification...

Scott Patrick Ryan: "Scintifict exprement double slit shot test proves we live in an Computer..." in Time Dilation Gets a...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.


FQXi FORUM
January 19, 2021

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Smaller than Planck time by Guenter Hauser [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Guenter Hauser wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 14:31 GMT
Essay Abstract

The twin paradox where two persons can age at different rates is an astonishing effect. I will ask whether we could get a better understanding of the non-global nature of time by a concept which I call transparent time. This kind of time is associated with unobservable transformations. I also do argue for the existence of an additional more fundamental type of time, the underlying time, partly in line with John Cramer's Pseudo time. The Planck time, an extremely small amount of time, is often considered as the smallest period of time. Smaller intervals either do not exist or a new theory is necessary to explain this domain of physics. Starting from the hypotheses that it is an intermediate equilibrium instead of a block universe what we are able to observe, I argue that it is the current version of the history which we do experience, and not the “original” history. From the equilibrium with the current version of the history, I get a series of operator equivalence classes C1, C2, C3,… together with a series of critical times. Each of the times in this decreasing series marks the beginning of a new domain of physics. Each domain has got its own version of an uncertainty principle. Planck time is not the smallest critical time and most of the critical times are smaller – smaller yet by another quite large factor. Finally all the laws of physics plus the universe(s) themselves, become united in a single space.

Author Bio

Degree in Physics from Technical University Munich

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.