Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Steve Dufourny: on 1/1/22 at 12:24pm UTC, wrote Dear Ignacio Cea, Congrats for your beautiful and relevant general idea, I...

Josh Hoffman: on 12/30/21 at 21:22pm UTC, wrote In this talk, we present a vector model of how consciousness, as depicted...


Steve Dufourny: "I have a dream , like you know I have conviced FQXi to create the forum..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "If we try so to consider these 4 lie groups and the 3D spheres like..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Steve Dufourny: "All seems a question of how we consider the vacuum and the condensates.If..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Steve Dufourny: "Let s try please dear members of FQXi, let s forget our vanity, lets forget..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "I play guitar and piano, let s imagine that this consciousness is a..." in Mathematical Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "It is this which seems important, this generality of systems more our..." in Mathematical Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "The point important at my humble opinion to understand this consciousness..." in Can We Feel What It’s...

Steve Dufourny: "it is a new physics and we need to know more, how they interact, how are..." in Can We Feel What It’s...

click titles to read articles

The Math of Consciousness: Q&A with Kobi Kremnitzer
A meditating mathematician is developing a theory of conscious experience to help understand the boundary between the quantum and classical world.

Can We Feel What It’s Like to Be Quantum?
Underground experiments in the heart of the Italian mountains are testing the links between consciousness and collapse theories of quantum physics.

The Thermodynamic Limits of Intelligence: Q&A with David Wolpert
Calculating the energy needed to acquire and compute information could help explain the (in)efficiency of human brains and guide the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence.

Gambling Against the Second Law
Using precision thermometry to make mini heat engines, that might, momentarily, bust through the thermodynamic limit.

Mind and Machine: What Does It Mean to Be Sentient?
Using neural networks to test definitions of 'autonomy.'

June 27, 2022

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: A vector model of how consciousness as integrated information makes a causal difference by Ignacio Cea [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Josh Hoffman wrote on Dec. 30, 2021 @ 21:22 GMT
In this talk, we present a vector model of how consciousness, as depicted by Integrated Information Theory (IIT), can exert genuine causal powers on its physical substrate. IIT identifies consciousness with an irreducible structure of causal powers that a system of mechanisms in its current state specifies. So, IIT asserts that consciousness is “supremely causal” (Tononi 2012, p. 309). Moreover, IIT’s first axiom is that consciousness exists, and one of its key theoretical assumptions is that to exist is to have causal power. Therefore, consciousness must have causal power, on pain of internal incoherence. However, there is a tension between consciousness being causally powerful and the fact that, in IIT’s framework, the behavior of any conscious system seems fully determined by its non-phenomenal properties.To resolve this, we argue that IIT’s interventionist framework should be complemented with a “causal powers” metaphysical view of causation, and propose a mathematically formulated method to translate IIT’s irreducible causal structure (=consciousness) to a vector model where phenomenal powers interact and determine what state of activation the system is more disposed to be in the immediate future. In this way, we could advance our understanding of how consciousness as integrated information makes a causal difference.

Keywords: #Consciousness #Mathematical_Models_of_Consciousness #Cea #Integrated_Information_Theory

Bookmark and Share

This forum thread is open to the public.

Steve Dufourny wrote on Jan. 1, 2022 @ 12:24 GMT
Dear Ignacio Cea, Congrats for your beautiful and relevant general idea, I liked. Regards

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.