Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

sherapova smith: on 12/10/17 at 16:42pm UTC, wrote After all, a well-designed envelope shows that you are willing to go the...

Steve Agnew: on 4/5/15 at 16:53pm UTC, wrote It is very nice to read these old essays and still be able to comment on...

Narendra Nath: on 12/18/08 at 6:22am UTC, wrote Dear Steve, What a pleasure it is to go through your humble attempt to try...

Steve: on 12/11/08 at 18:22pm UTC, wrote Thanks, Ken! I do think that nonlocal constraints represent a promising...

Ken Wharton: on 12/3/08 at 18:34pm UTC, wrote Great stuff, Steve! This essay comes pretty close to saying something that...

Steven Weinstein: on 12/2/08 at 14:23pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The possibility of physics in multiple time...


Lorraine Ford: "Re Blogger Ian Durham replied on Aug. 25, 2019 @ 15:31 GMT..."Free will..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Lorraine Ford: "So, define “free will” Ian. It’s obvious that you are not talking..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Anthony, you have briefly explained the fictitious (centrifugal) force...." in Bonus Koan: Distant...

Vipul Agarwal: "All about this post is very informative and unique. I am thankful to you..." in FQXi'ers Debate the Deep...

Georgina Woodward: "What is happening in material reality provides the connection to inertia...." in Bonus Koan: Distant...

andrea gonzalez: "Interesting stuff to read. Keep it up. If want to collect free gift card..." in Memory, Causality and...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in First Things First: The...

Poker Online: "" in Downward causation:...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

August 26, 2019

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Many Times by Steven Weinstein [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Steven Weinstein wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 14:23 GMT
Essay Abstract

The possibility of physics in multiple time dimensions is investigated. Drawing on recent work by Walter Craig and myself, I show that, contrary to conventional wisdom, there is a well-posed initial value problem---deterministic, stable evolution---for theories in multiple time dimensions. Though similar in many ways to ordinary, single-time theories, the multi-time theories have some rather intriguing properties which suggest new directions for the understanding of fundamental physics.

Author Bio

I'm an assistant professor in the Dept. of Philosophy at the University of Waterloo, and an affiliate of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. I've previously taught at Princeton University and Dartmouth College. In addition to time, I'm interested in the foundations of quantum theory, quantum gravity, and thermodynamics, as well as other, more generally philosophical issues such as the problem of induction and the nature of the mind. When I have time, I play a highly-modified '52-reissue Telecaster through an original '56 Fender Deluxe. As loud as possible.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

Ken Wharton wrote on Dec. 3, 2008 @ 18:34 GMT
Great stuff, Steve!

This essay comes pretty close to saying something that I've been considering lately, but haven't seen anywhere else: that one of the "problems" solved by cosmological inflation may not be a "problem", but instead a *clue*. I'm referring to the fact that causally disconnected regions of space-time somehow have the same temperature.

You don't quite come out and say it, but are you suggesting that the same sort of natural "non-local" constraint that you're discussing might obviate the need for cosmological inflation entirely? If so, it's tempting to think that the apparent non-locality of entangled particles and the apparent non-locality of the early universe might have a similar underlying explanation, rooted entirely in the allowable boundary conditions on local field equations.


Bookmark and Share

Steve wrote on Dec. 11, 2008 @ 18:22 GMT
Thanks, Ken!

I do think that nonlocal constraints represent a promising and largely unexplored way of explaining nonlocality. I don't think of them as boundary conditions, however, since they hold on every "slice" of spacetime. Thus, like the constraints arising in gauge theories, they must be maintained by the dynamics.

- Steve

Bookmark and Share

Narendra Nath wrote on Dec. 18, 2008 @ 06:22 GMT
Dear Steve,

What a pleasure it is to go through your humble attempt to try multi-dimensional time and see the mathematical outcome as explaining the singularities of the early universe with the present one. I am not a theoretician but this study of yours appeal to me as very meanigful as an experimental physicist. Physics is both . More often, theoreticians tend to forget it while experimrntalist have to remain grouded to the realities.

Let me start philosophically taking acient Indian scriptures which talk widely of different universes ( called ' loks') with widely varying time scales, as much as million of years to a single year! Correspondingly, the life scales also vary accordingly. The higher conscious states belong to higher lifetime scales! These have alwaqys fascinated me as a child when i use to hear stories from grandparents in this regard.

In my own posted essay, i have indicated the need for different Physics to tackle the very early universe. The attached posts by way of two other manuscripts provide the background for my essay.For example, there is a write-up 'Inconstancy of the Physical Constants and the Strengths of the force/fields.

The problem with any profession lies with following aqn established 'habit' that the methodology eveolved compels one to find it hard to innovate or may i say become 'unbiased ' of the existing knowledge/information.

i need to stop here before any further discussion till i get your valuable response!

Bookmark and Share

Steve Agnew wrote on Apr. 5, 2015 @ 16:53 GMT
It is very nice to read these old essays and still be able to comment on them. I don't know where Weinstein is now in his journey in time, but he really came very close to the truth about time.

Unfortunately, space got in the way and he never did make it to a quantum time. After all, one you create a spacetime, time loses its meaning and simply becomes a displacement in that spacetime.

Reconstructing a 2D time with matter and not space will reveal the truth.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

sherapova smith wrote on Dec. 10, 2017 @ 16:42 GMT
After all, a well-designed envelope shows that you are willing to go the extra step.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.