Hello Professor Smolin,

I liked your youtube about the time and your general analysis about the spacetime. I agree that this time is essential for the evolution and the correlattions with the motions and so the variables, changes.... Without htis time, we don t exist simply. It is intersting what you tell about time symmetry laws emerge from time assymetry laws in a philosophical point of...

view entire post

Hello Professor Smolin,

I liked your youtube about the time and your general analysis about the spacetime. I agree that this time is essential for the evolution and the correlattions with the motions and so the variables, changes.... Without htis time, we don t exist simply. It is intersting what you tell about time symmetry laws emerge from time assymetry laws in a philosophical point of vue.

The ontology and philosophy at my opinion are important but unfortunally we have still limitations about the origin of the universe and the foundamental mathematical and physical objects. Of course we approach all days in knowledges but even with the probabilities and the statistics, we are limited. I believe strongly that this GR even in being relevant and correct like the einstein field equations need to superimpose a deeper logic. The majority actually consider only this GR and photons like prmordial essence of the unverse and so they consider strings inside in 1D oscillating vibrating at this planck scale connected with a 1D cosmic field of the GR, but it is just an assumption at my opinion, we have probably a deeper logic.

I agree that said about the fact that it exists rational answwers. Maybe simply these fields and phasis can give the road towards these deeper truths. I consider personally particles in a superfluidity and 3 spacetimes , not only the GR. So the space and time and fields them are emergent from this deeper logic. I have remarked that the GR alone and the strings have several philosophical and ontological problems , mainly the evolution and the origin of the universe, that is why I believe strongly that the space vacuum of the dark energy possesses the main codes and that the dark matter cold can too be considered, like if the baryonic matters appear due to this space encoding the cold DM and the photons, that permits to solve the constant cosmol problem and the quantum gravitation that I have quantified like this in respecting the newtonian mechanics and with the geometrical spherical topological algebras that I have invented and in considering the 3 spacetimes made of particles and like foundamental objects 3D spheres.

You PRR and PII are very relevant I must say in their general meaning and that can be extrapolated to many things. That can be extrapolated at my opinion for these 3 spacetimes and their relational links. A thing that I have remarked and intriguing me is about these symmetries and assymetries , we see that we loose the symmetry somewhere creating the unique creations, the big question is why and how and where.... So the wiew of an event indeed can be correlated with physical fields but these fields if they are emergent, so these events can be linked with these particles and the 3 spacetimes and if the codes , the main codes are in this vacuum of the DE, that becomes relevant about the analysis of informations and the entropies....

The foundamentals and emergences so can be ranked and better understood . You spoke about the energy momentum, it is essential it seems to me and we return at this philosophical ontological origin , all seems a question of cause of this reality indeed and why. I believe that the momemtum are essential like the others properties of this SM , but we need maybe to consider the volumes, spherical and the number of spheres considered to better understand these realities and emergences. The kinetic and potential energies can extrapolated in all humility with my model.

Causalities, events, kinetic and potential energies, momentum, fields.....all they can be ranked. It is not easy that said due to these limitations , that is why tghe real general universal causal sets are difficult to know. But you are right, the momentum space is essential and I d say the momentum spaces in considering these 3 spacetimes....

Your analysis of amplitudes and energy momentum conservation seem the key .We can rank the networksand their varieties. Ay my opnion I am conviced that we need to go beyon this GR , I doubt strongly that the Universe has omly created the photons you know. Maybe in being relevant this GR it has too created a philosophical prison. That is why the slower or higher varieties can superimpose the 3 ethers and in considering 3D spheres instead of points or strings. There are at my opinion constants for these celstial and quantum spheres and they can help for the ranking of all. That can permit a better understanding of this Kinetic and potential energies.

You equtions utilised are very interesting about the causalities, I am going to consider this reasoning for my model in considering also the schrodinger works, that could permit to superimpose these 3 spacetimes and the memergences in probably considering the vacuum space of the DE like not emergent, the two others yes. So indeed the lagrancian multipliers are relevant to utilise mainly about the pure motion of these 3D quantum and cosmological spheres. Their oscillations vibrations also can be considered.

Congrats for your general works, and thanks for sharing it , best regards.

view post as summary