Hi Lorraine, I don t understand why you tell this about the physicists and philosophes. Never when the rational universalism is understood they affirm these things. The Quantum Bayesianism is interesing indeed and is an interpretation of the quantum mechanics philosophically speaking.

We can tell all what we want and have our own interpretations physical and philosophical, we have not found...

view entire post

Hi Lorraine, I don t understand why you tell this about the physicists and philosophes. Never when the rational universalism is understood they affirm these things. The Quantum Bayesianism is interesing indeed and is an interpretation of the quantum mechanics philosophically speaking.

We can tell all what we want and have our own interpretations physical and philosophical, we have not found this universal origin of our reality and nor the foundamental objects and why they create all this universe and its diversity of matters. Heisenberg and Borh d tell us that the copenaghen school is the road about the waves functions. Bohm him considet this wave pilot and Everett this manyworlds. But they are intepretations limited because we have not the main causes philosophical, ontological, physical. My model considers the transformations of energy in this central cosnmological sphere , a super matter energy , and the philosophy is correlated, but we cannot affirm.

A point important is the emerging consciousness also and the informations, there the works of Shannon, Gibbs and Von Neumann are relevant and I try to converge in my model but we have always these limitations about these primoridal informations and the universal entropy. The real unknown is this distribution of matters, informations, fields , forces and energies.

Like said Rovelli the interpretations when they are relevant can converge and it is there the interest in trying with the probabilities to find the universal partition, it is what I try with my 3D spheres and the correlated philosophy. It becomes very epistemologically, ontologically, philosophically foundamental.

The reality, the intepretations, the observations, the knowledges, the measurements can converge in resume and we cannot just focus on one interpretation, we must try to converge.

It is there that the good mathematical tools become relevant if they are under this deterministic physics about the waves, fields, particles. That is why the geometrical algebras can be interesting and the fractals, it is what I try to do with the spherical topological geometrical algebras of these 3D spheres in considering these different philosophical intepretations, the qbism is interesting indeed but it is not the only one peice , the others also are important and it is in sorting and converging that we can find the universal partition and the real transformations of this Energy. If we have violations of parameters like in the EPR, there are reasons, that proves that we must go deeper in adding deeper parameters to our standard model, that is why the uncertainty or others are important to consider. The real foundamental of this universe is not the competition but the deterministic complementarity in resume. That is why it is always better to be in this complementarity than in this darwinist reductor competition.

We can go deeper about the materialism and the immaterialism, like a bridge between the 3D and the 0D and in philosophy we can consider that this 0D primoridal energy is an infinite eternal consciousness , wich is not an infinite heat for me. Even the waves functions can go deeper in its analyses. The Qbism is seen like an anti realistic interpretation due to the agents and the subjectivity, but this intepretation can become realistic with the convergences that I explained, the fatalism is not a parameter so , but the complementarity and the add of knowledges permit to harmonise the defaults of interpretations, the same for the 5 other interpretations.

Regards

view post as summary

Lorraine, let s take like you tell these boolean algebras, and lets consider so the binar systems and the true, false. It is different than the general algebras where the logic of additions, multiplications, numbers are th variables. So if we go in the laws of this consciousness about the choices, and feelings, thoughts. But we must recognise that the intelligence, the logic are different than a...

view entire post

Lorraine, let s take like you tell these boolean algebras, and lets consider so the binar systems and the true, false. It is different than the general algebras where the logic of additions, multiplications, numbers are th variables. So if we go in the laws of this consciousness about the choices, and feelings, thoughts. But we must recognise that the intelligence, the logic are different than a consciousness. They comverge yes, but are different.That is why we can create an artificial intelliegence but it will not be conscious . It is mainly about the codes, the main codes and the encodings of informations. And, or, not, if, true, false... are not sufficient to create a consciousness because the complexity and the mechanisms are beyond our philosophical understanding. It is mainly about these variables like you tell, but we don t know the real mechanism of variables of this consciousness. The conjunstions and disjunctions , yes it is important, but we have these limitations. The operations need deeper paramters to superimpose to find this bridge between the intelliegnce and the consciousness, already that our knowledges in physics and maths are limited, so even the intelligence cannot reach an universal intelliegcne, so it is still more complicated for this consciousness.

I have an idea for you about the operations to reach the universal computing but also the superintelliegcne and also this consciousness, let s take the geometrical algebras , and 3 E8 superimposed, now take my spherical topological geometrical algebras and consider 3 main finite series of 3D spheres instead of points or strings and consider the dirac large number and a space disappearing due to the specific series of spherical volumes from the cemtral biggest one, now consider all the equations known in physics and insert your boolean agebras for the operations, the sortings, synchros and superimposings. Now consider the associativity, the commutativity, the non associativity, the non commutativity.The true, false, and also the if , or, not.... and consider now the densities of informations and their timelifes also. See that the volumes don t change because the 3 series primoridal of 3D spheres don t change. It is a kind of universal turing machnine mimating the universe , but it lacks things, so the statistics and probabilities can permit to reach the universal aprtition but not easy.

The main codes are in this space vacuum and the two others are fuels , photons and cold dark matter, the informations are not in these photons or cold dark matter in my reasoning, they are in this space vacuum, so we must find the bridge with the informations and the waves, fields towards the codes of these particles of this vacuum. The 3 E8 superimposed in replacing by these series can be a general road to reach a real universal computer but also to reach this consciousness, but there are philosophical problems, it is an other story. There is also a problem of uncompleteness. We arrive so at the importance of groups and these spherical algebras can help to predict but not easy seeing the fact that it lacks equations, variables , ....

You can create with all this a revolutionary system of diagrams with the spheres.The relevance is to link with the vectors, scalars of these 3 spacetimes superimposed. But it is an enormous puzzle because it is how acts the universe for me in its complexity.

view post as summary