Hello Professor Rovelli,

It is a very relevant general analysis. I agree to begin with the fact that it exists concrete general theories converging due to their interpretations when they are rational and deterministicv like said Feynmann. I make the same in my model and these 3D spheres , I don t reject the others, I try to converge in sorting and in respecting this determinism if I can...

view entire post

Hello Professor Rovelli,

It is a very relevant general analysis. I agree to begin with the fact that it exists concrete general theories converging due to their interpretations when they are rational and deterministicv like said Feynmann. I make the same in my model and these 3D spheres , I don t reject the others, I try to converge in sorting and in respecting this determinism if I can say. It is what I make with the strings for example because these quantum 3D spheres oscillate, vibrate and are in motions oscillations in a kind of superfluidity considering these 3 main spacetimes . So indeed we learn from each others.

You take the different philosophies of 5 main interpretations, the qubism, the pilot wave,the relational QM, the copenaghen one, the many worlds. All this is about the metaphysics and I have my own idea about these ontological and philosophical intepretations. The real secret is to find after all the origin of the universe and the foundamental objects. I believe that we have personally an eternal infinite consciousness in 0D and this thing has created a central main cosmic sphere , a kind of super matter energy able to sent all kind of informations and it is with 3 main primoridal series of 3D spheres in my model.

You speak about the anti realism and the realism, but maybe all is realist , it is just that we have limitations mainly in technologies, scales, and knowledges. The maths also must be interpretated with wisdom and we must doubt also, I believe strongly that the physics is the main chief orchestra and the maths a tool to prove them, not the opposite. The philosophy can be determinsitic I beleive. It seems that we are inside a project in evolution, it is the meaning of my theory of spherisation.

It is interesting to name these thinkers, Jordan, Heisenberg, Born, Pauli,Dirac, and their works about the quantum mechanics and the probabilities. The have given a road and we can with the maths and good foundamental objects go farer if the maths are well interpreted with their rational realsit sortings I believe. Born has had this nobel prize with his paper and the transitions are indeed relevant.It is the predictions the secret and the good mathematical sortings. The observations also and measurements under this universal partition that unfortunally we don t know. These operators are essential. And the experiments in labs can have relevant resulsts.All seems under a specific universal partition where the maths, numbers, physics, sciences, cosmology respect the universal partition. All is a question of properties and interactions indeed.

We return about these probablities and maths permitting to extrapolate this QM. The objectivity being an important key , that is why the subjective results due to these maths must be always taken with this said deterministic wisdom.

You speak about schrodinger who was one of my favorites with Von neumann and dirac. What is the wave function indeed really and how can we extyrapolate it to converge with this realistic QM with these probablities, observations, measurements. That can give the universal key, I beleive the spheres are this key but of course they are complex in the details. There is an universal link between these cosmological and quantum spheres in logic and the metaphysics and philosophy is correlated, an universal truth can appear. The confusion is the complexity maybe.

How can we converge towards the truths in resume , how to predict correctly, how to sort correctly. It is there that the philosophy, the ontology become essential. How to interpret these limits, these discontinuities, these variables. How to consider this origin of the universe? from fields, from coded particles, have we these strings only in this GR and EFE, have we 3d spheres without extradiemnsions? the answer can be found with a kind of conjecture. The values converge in sorting correctly for me.

You speak about this cat of schrodinger with different interpretations, I have my own ideas about this body mind soul problem , we must consider deeper variables, parameters. The wave functions , fields, and this GR and standard model are not sufficient for me , we must insert , superimpose the two other spacetimes, this space vacuum of this DE and this cold dark matter and the evolution, that will permit to explain our deep unknowns like this QG, the cosmological constant problem, the hard problem of consciousness, and others. The fields and waves seem emergent , not the particles in logic. Maybe the error of many is there, to consider only this GR and the fields like origin general of the reality.

Your idea of S1 , S2, S3 and the events and probabilities is very interesting, how to consider the meanings and values , probabilities indeed. The different interpretations, theories become relevant for the coherences and decoherences if we find the correct philosophy and the foundamental objects .The subjectivity in fact can be objective with the good sortings, rtional and determinsitic. I beleive that the complexity of motions, rotations, oscillations, vibrations of these quantum and cosmological 3D spheres in this superfluidity of these 3 spacetimes is the key. We can interpret with the good partitions the observations with determinism. The empirism, determinism, philosophy, ontology,realism are indeed under this universal partition where several roads converge.

Congrats for this youtube, I liked , that permits to share ideas and interpretations, we search the truths after all.

Regards

view post as summary