Bear with me, what's not quantum mechanical about this?

There is a syndrome in clinical psychology that is one of the earliest identified and most intensely studied in the history of psychology, and which is known to afflict a small but significant percentage of population globally in such a consistent yet apparently random manner that you would have to be a monk not to have encountered it....

view entire post

Bear with me, what's not quantum mechanical about this?

There is a syndrome in clinical psychology that is one of the earliest identified and most intensely studied in the history of psychology, and which is known to afflict a small but significant percentage of population globally in such a consistent yet apparently random manner that you would have to be a monk not to have encountered it. It plays out like this; someone whether gregarious or shy bounces around like a BB in the social boxcar, they want as everyone does, to be part of some larger scheme of things. But rather than the usual, normal (causal) relationship building structure, They tend to put themself ahead of someone else in that person's affairs with scant recognition of the personal responsibilities which that person's position entails, then progress to do the same with other's they recognize as associated with that first person of interest, entangling everyone in a web of inter-relationship that really never existed among those other associates whom then find themselves perplexed as to what the narrative is without any rational voluntary accountability in explanation on BB's part. Only some implicit design that, 'you are like this and you other is like that and then this is going to be like that and that is going to do this.'

It baffled cross-disciplinary research for more than a century, there seemed to be no direct correlation with any cause that held consistently and only that cause. It begins to manifest itself in early childhood and progresses invariably into the classic problem child prone to angry demands for focused attention. Angry Child Syndrome, or Childhood Anger Syndrome. It does not respond well to therapy, the therapy becomes an assimilated tool. It has only been in the last perhaps 20 years that advances in brain mapping employing Small Quantum Interference Detectors that it has become a matter of theoretical research that the syndrome is not the result of something that develops because of something else in the course of normal infantile development, but tragically simply something that normally develops between 12 and 16 months which simply doesn't, for no reason at all. And that something is a capacity to sustain a sense of affection spawned by mutual attention to attention between mother and child, unless the mother's attention remains fixed on the infant. After 16 months exponential growth of neural pathways and connections of neural clusters subsumes the normal ability and provides the base of sentient cohesive social intercourse. But after 16 months if that capacity has not been embedded it cannot 'reboot' and doesn't simply retard development, but deprives the afflicted individual, of that capacity to carry a sense of affection from one focus of attention into the attentive relationship built with someone else. The subject assembles disassociative affections into a complex narrative to make this person into something that person connects with through the subject's self, but the affection of the first person has faded out of cognition and doesn't influence the affection with the second and often results in an alienation of affection between the first and second. Tragic, and difficult for families especially with an afflicted member.

Now that is no where near topic, but illustrative none the less, that superposition is random and could allow for physically real reversal in proper time at the quantum level. Not because of something that happens, but because something causal that could should or would happen, simply doesn't for no reason at all. Schrodinger's Catfight.

view post as summary