Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Joe Schindler: on 4/21/21 at 18:19pm UTC, wrote Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021 Monday 29th March, 2021 Branching...


Joe Schindler: "Thank you to Eugen Muchowski for suggesting we open a thread to discuss his..." in On a contextual model...

Georgina Woodward: "I've just read that sharks and turtles also use the Earth's magnetic field..." in How does the brain...

Steve Dufourny: "Lorraine, You tell an interesting point when you tell "The Boolean AND and..." in How does the brain...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Lorraine, I was at university also in 3 in geology but I have stopped..." in Round Table on 'Varieties...

Lorraine Ford: "Steve, I studied Physics, Maths and Computer Science at university. The..." in Round Table on 'Varieties...

Georgina Woodward: ""As an alternate option to search your book, you can use advanced search...." in The Nature of Time

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Vesuvius, Thanks for looking. Its on My books can be found..." in The Nature of Time

Steve Dufourny: "I search a road with the spherical topological geometrical algebras that I..." in Alternative Models of...

click titles to read articles

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

May 18, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Two Types of Indeterminism by Thomas Müller & Tomasz Placek [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Joe Schindler wrote on Apr. 21, 2021 @ 18:19 GMT
Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021

Monday 29th March, 2021

Branching space-times (BST), due to Belnap (Synthese, 1992), is a rigorous formal framework for representing indeterministic scenarios in spatio-temporal detail. BST has the resources for defining precise notions of modal and probabilistic correlations, aka funny business. Modal funny business is, to put it informally, an unexpected failure of locally possible outcomes to combine to a globally possible joint outcome. Similarly, probabilistic funny business occurs when 13 local outcomes have joint probabilities that do not factor in the way one would expect them to. Given these notions, BST is well suited for representing and analyzing quantum correlation experiments, which are intricate spatio-temporal arrangements that can exhibit strange correlations. In this talk, we consider only modal correlations, such as exhibited in the GHZ experiment. Ever since Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (1935), there has been a quest for providing extended descriptions of quantum correlation experiments that avoid the troublesome correlations by adding hidden variables. In BST, we can characterize different ways in which the given surface structure of such experiments can be extended, and for this analysis, it is crucial to spell out what it means to represent a quantum correlation experiment not just as a spatio-temporal happening, but specifically as an experiment. It turns out that in experiments, two types of indeterminism need to be explicitly distinguished. We will show in BST terms which role this distinction plays in deriving “no go” results for hidden variables.

Keywords: #quantum #interpretation #indeterminism #correlations #epr #bell #branching #spacetimes

Bookmark and Share

This forum thread is open to the public.

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.