Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Joe Schindler: on 4/21/21 at 18:19pm UTC, wrote Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021 Monday 29th March, 2021 Branching...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Be careful, there are many people who are not who they pretend to be." in Global Collaboration

Georgina Woodward: "The preceding explanation of wavefunction collapse is, I think,..." in Consciousness and the...

jim hughes: "I'm not a mathematician. So what I see here is some smart people who..." in Consciousness and the...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello FQXi, the members and all, I try to do my best to unite and convice..." in Global Collaboration

Georgina Woodward: "Broken machine: What do[es] I see next? The I that was, E.I, has not been..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Lorraine Ford: "Hi Stefan, I hope that a good leader, and a good political party, is..." in The Present State of...

Lorraine Ford: "We live in an age of computing. But physics, mathematics and philosophy,..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "I've copied the comment to the thread where it belongs. This orphan can be..." in The Room in the Elephant:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Good Vibrations
Microbead 'motor' exploits natural fluctuations for power.

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.


FQXi BLOGS
September 29, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Two Types of Indeterminism by Thomas Müller & Tomasz Placek [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Joe Schindler wrote on Apr. 21, 2021 @ 18:19 GMT
Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021

Monday 29th March, 2021

Branching space-times (BST), due to Belnap (Synthese, 1992), is a rigorous formal framework for representing indeterministic scenarios in spatio-temporal detail. BST has the resources for defining precise notions of modal and probabilistic correlations, aka funny business. Modal funny business is, to put it informally, an unexpected failure of locally possible outcomes to combine to a globally possible joint outcome. Similarly, probabilistic funny business occurs when 13 local outcomes have joint probabilities that do not factor in the way one would expect them to. Given these notions, BST is well suited for representing and analyzing quantum correlation experiments, which are intricate spatio-temporal arrangements that can exhibit strange correlations. In this talk, we consider only modal correlations, such as exhibited in the GHZ experiment. Ever since Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (1935), there has been a quest for providing extended descriptions of quantum correlation experiments that avoid the troublesome correlations by adding hidden variables. In BST, we can characterize different ways in which the given surface structure of such experiments can be extended, and for this analysis, it is crucial to spell out what it means to represent a quantum correlation experiment not just as a spatio-temporal happening, but specifically as an experiment. It turns out that in experiments, two types of indeterminism need to be explicitly distinguished. We will show in BST terms which role this distinction plays in deriving “no go” results for hidden variables.



Keywords: #quantum #interpretation #indeterminism #correlations #epr #bell #branching #spacetimes

Bookmark and Share


This forum thread is open to the public.


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.