Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Steve Dufourny: on 4/23/21 at 12:42pm UTC, wrote In fact it is this primitive ontology about the real primoridal origin the...

Steve Dufourny: on 4/23/21 at 12:14pm UTC, wrote Hi Professor Wallace, I liked your youtube, it is very general and...

David Wallace: on 4/21/21 at 18:10pm UTC, wrote Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021 Monday 29th March, 2021 `Quantum...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "So information, i.e. consciousness, is NOT about a whole lot of seemingly..." in Interview: Information...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi, It is an interesting paper, friendly" in The secret of planets’...

Thomas Ray: "Hi Rod, You wrote "Regarding your quote from your paper, I think I agree..." in A Physical Theory based...

Christian Corda: "Dear Joe, Thanks a lot. It is an honour for me to have my paper signalled..." in The secret of planets’...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Lorraine, Lol I don t see you like a pest but like a rebel against the..." in A Physical Theory based...

Lorraine Ford: "Steve, I’m sorry to be such a pest. I’m laughing to myself when I..." in Interview: Information...

Steve Dufourny: "Ulla, I believe that the good persons can be multidisciplinary , not only..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Ulla, Richard seems a smart and relevant mathematician, he has his..." in Global Collaboration


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.


FQXi BLOGS
August 3, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: On the Plurality of Quantum Theories by David Wallace [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger David Wallace wrote on Apr. 21, 2021 @ 18:10 GMT
Quantum Limits of Knowledge 2021

Monday 29th March, 2021

`Quantum theory' is not a single physical theory but a framework in which many different concrete theories fit. As such, a solution to the quantum measurement problem ought to provide a recipe to interpret each such concrete theory, in a mutually consistent way. But - with the exception of the Everett interpretation - the main extant solutions either try to make sense of the abstract framework as if it were concrete, or else interpret one particular quantum theory under the fiction that it is fundamental and exact. In either case, these approaches are unable to help themselves to the very theory-laden, level-relative ways in which quantum theory makes contact with 20 experiment in mainstream physics, and so are committed to major revisionary projects which have not been carried out even in outline. As such, only the Everett interpretation is currently suited to make sense of quantum physics as we find it.



Keywords: #quantum #interpretations #foundations #realism #manyworlds #measurement

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

This forum thread is open to the public.


Steve Dufourny wrote on Apr. 23, 2021 @ 12:14 GMT
Hi Professor Wallace,

I liked your youtube, it is very general and relevant philosophically speaking, I agree about the fact that concrete theories fit together when they seem to desribe the physicality. I have considered a kind of conjecture betweem my theory of spherisation, the evolution optimisation of the universal sphere or future sphere with quantum and cosmological 3D spheres and...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Apr. 23, 2021 @ 12:42 GMT
In fact it is this primitive ontology about the real primoridal origin the big secret, I have remarked that the majority of thinkers considered only this GR and the photons like primoridal essence and so they consider that the fields are the origin of our reality due to tensors and vibrations of points or strings at this planck scale in the einstein fields equations. But I see differently...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.