Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Narendra Nath: on 12/25/08 at 4:59am UTC, wrote Timothy, a concise presentation of your idea of the Universe from start to...

matthew kolasinski: on 12/2/08 at 17:59pm UTC, wrote Hello Mr. Faucett, i like the idea of gravity as being that which shapes...

Alex: on 12/2/08 at 5:49am UTC, wrote Thank You! This made me think about several new concepts to explore while...

Amy Ciesielka: on 12/1/08 at 22:05pm UTC, wrote Your approach is simple and elegant. Are the gravitation shapes 2D or 3D?

Timothy E Faucett: on 12/1/08 at 16:54pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract In any natural process there exists an inherent...


kurt stocklmeir: "gravity associated with gas and gas running into stars can change orbit of..." in Alternative Models of...

Joe Fisher: "One real visible Universe must only have one real visible appearance...." in Why This Universe?

Pop News: "These questions are amazing loving them... International Yoga Day 2018" in Why This Universe?

Patrik Miertviezky: "Hello everybody! My name is Patrik and i am 26 years old girl from Europe...." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Rachelle Marie: "The lengthy form of the meeting, available on the page, you can similarly..." in Podcast Up: Interacting...

jhon dwayne: "If any customer face problem during window installing then he can call our..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

jhon dwayne: "If any customer face problem during window installing then he can call our..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

kurt stocklmeir: "there is a lot of gas between galaxies - there are a lot of small galaxies..." in Alternative Models of...

click titles to read articles

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

June 22, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Gravity: The Power Source of Entropic Time by Timothy E Faucett [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Timothy E Faucett wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 16:54 GMT
Essay Abstract

In any natural process there exists an inherent tendency towards the dissipation of useful energy to an equalized state. This is known as Entropy. The universe is a natural process. This process consists of "surroundings" and "systems" made up of quantities of matter, pressure differences, density differences, and temperature differences which all tend to equalize over time. All processes require a ‘power source’ to create a differential potential within the process in order for the process to ‘function’ or do ‘work’. This equalization tendency provides the poles of a power source for things to ‘progress’ in the universe ‘over time’. This paper proposes that time is a process and in turn requires a power source to ‘function’ and that power source is gravity. This paper also proposes that singularity becomes one of the two reference points (poles) of the power source, while the opposite reference point (pole) is non-singularity or Polylarity. This creates a differential condition for gravity to exist as a ‘power source’ or universe size force. Polylarity would be defined as uniform distribution of mass, energy and gravity in the universe. The relative potential of Gravity in this model provides a power source for time to function.

Author Bio

A Multi-Disciplined Engineering Professional with a wide variety of technical skills and experience in every aspect of a high technology organization, including four IEEE nationally published papers on the subject of power systems, materials science and robotics.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

Amy Ciesielka wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 22:05 GMT
Your approach is simple and elegant. Are the gravitation shapes 2D or 3D?

Bookmark and Share

Alex wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 05:49 GMT
Thank You! This made me think about several new concepts to explore while reading. Very interesting.

Bookmark and Share

matthew kolasinski wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 17:59 GMT
Hello Mr. Faucett,

i like the idea of gravity as being that which shapes what we experience as the passing of time - that makes sense to me, gravity being the source of the geometry of our world. i'd made a comment to this effect at Dr. Pitkänen's page.

however, this does not appear actually to be time.

coming to think that, for physics purposes, time needs to be defined very simply, something along the lines of:

"Time is a potential for data to exist."

and further define this relationship as non-commutative; that is, that an absence of detectable data does not necessarily demand that the potential is non-existant.

and all other effects associated with time to be considered as arising from associations of processes in time.

i hope to eventually find the time to read the entirety of your paper - there's a bunch of new posts here, time's growing short.

glad to meet you,

matt kolasinski

Bookmark and Share

Narendra Nath wrote on Dec. 25, 2008 @ 04:59 GMT

a concise presentation of your idea of the Universe from start to finish. You say that there was pre-start pure Gravitational potential, containing the entire mass and energy. Then, what triggered the Big Bang to manifest the physical universe. You are fine with your two polarity concept that results in continuing the evolution of the Universe. Gravity acts in distributing mass and energy in the universe so as to conform to increasing time along with increasing entropy , say from 0 to the maximum possible. Then what will be that maximum that should bring its termination, again a singularity similar to the start!

Also as per your description the total mass /energy content remains constant all through from potential to dynamic to potential energy. It is a kind of pendulum simple harmonic motion that has all potential energy at the two end of momentary stoppage and maximum kinetic energy at the mid point. But then at all other stages, both potential energy builds as kinetic energy gets lowered. May be that is not what you envisage!

Also, you deal entirely with gravity only. What you want to say about the other physical fields that have manifested in the universe, viz., nuclear strong and weak and the electromagnetic. Have these also emerged out of the gravtational field. How then you may fix with the idea of the Unified field as the source of all the manifested four fields. In my essay on the website , i have talked about some mysterious aspects of the universe, i wonder if your ideas may help solve some of the mysteries that are indicated!

Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.