FQXi Community

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Jack James: on 4/5/21 at 22:42pm UTC, wrote I noticed this was a 4 dimensional approach also. ...

Steve Dufourny: on 4/4/21 at 20:31pm UTC, wrote I have seen in my life many things and odd persons but there you win a...

Steve Dufourny: on 4/4/21 at 20:20pm UTC, wrote Who are you and why do you copy my words and why you make this ??? totally...

Steve Dufourny: on 4/1/21 at 12:08pm UTC, wrote I give some food for thoughts, one of my favorite thinkers is Von Neumann,...

Steve Dufourny: on 3/28/21 at 19:40pm UTC, wrote Some ideas still ,It is the same with other methods,the hopf algebras...

Steve Dufourny: on 3/27/21 at 10:10am UTC, wrote Professor Hamilton, I relisten your youtube and I like it , it is a very...

Steve Dufourny: on 3/26/21 at 19:26pm UTC, wrote We must after all vanish the singularities, solve the cosmological constant...

Steve Dufourny: on 3/26/21 at 18:24pm UTC, wrote We have a problem with the Black holes and we don t know well what they are...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "How to formalise these couplings of scalar fields of the DE and DM in our..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Steve Dufourny: "even I d say that the numbers and the spheres are under specific partitions..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Steve Dufourny: "stop this please, FQXi is well moderated , so don t insist" in George Ellis - How can...

Martin Gray: "What are the different skin conditions that people often face? Every skin..." in George Ellis - How can...

Ulla Mattfolk: "In a statement posted on its website on 27 June, SNRIU said that "due to..." in Global Collaboration

Ulla Mattfolk: "Cont. Of the nuclear countries Sweden and Germany has said no thanks, they..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "Jonathan Dickau ,hope you are well, always cool to have your points of vue,..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

Steve Dufourny: "This platform is about theoretical physics, it is irritating to have these..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Math of Consciousness: Q&A with Kobi Kremnitzer
A meditating mathematician is developing a theory of conscious experience to help understand the boundary between the quantum and classical world.

Can We Feel What It’s Like to Be Quantum?
Underground experiments in the heart of the Italian mountains are testing the links between consciousness and collapse theories of quantum physics.

The Thermodynamic Limits of Intelligence: Q&A with David Wolpert
Calculating the energy needed to acquire and compute information could help explain the (in)efficiency of human brains and guide the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence.

Gambling Against the Second Law
Using precision thermometry to make mini heat engines, that might, momentarily, bust through the thermodynamic limit.

Mind and Machine: What Does It Mean to Be Sentient?
Using neural networks to test definitions of 'autonomy.'

read & discuss all articles

FQXi BLOGS

July 3, 2022

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Unification of the four forces in the Spin11,1 geometric algebra by Andrew Hamilton [refresh]

Blogger Andrew J S Hamilton wrote on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 13:57 GMT

The spinors of the group Spin(N) of rotations in N spacetime dimensions are indexed by a bitcode with [N/2] bits. A well-known promising grand unified group that contains the standard-model group is Spin(10). Fermions in the standard model are described by five bits durgb, consisting of two weak bits d and u, and three color bits r, g, b. If a sixth bit T is added, necessary to accommodate a time dimension, then the enlarged Spin(11,1) algebra contains the standard-model and Dirac algebras as commuting subalgebras, unifying all four forces. The largest subgroup of Spin(11,1) that commutes with the Poincare group is Spin(5)xSpin(6), suggesting that the latter is a partial unification on the way to complete unification in Spin(11,1). The Spin(5)xSpin(6) algebra contains a subalgebra with precisely the properties of the electroweak Higgs field. The Spin(5)xSpin(6) symmetry contains, and is spontaneously broken by, a U(1) symmetry related to the U_{B-L}(1) symmetry. Grand unification is associated with a change in the dimensionality of spacetime.

The talk addresses the ethics of responsible scientific refereeing.

Keywords: #GrandUnification

this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate

This forum thread is open to the public.

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 14:12 GMT

Hi , very interesting, If I can ask you several questions. You tell that that unifies the four forces, so the quantum gravitation also, but have you quantified and renormalised it , because if you consider G c and h to unify the GR and the QM qith geometrical algebras like Lie, clifford or hopf, it is not renormalisable due to fact that the fields mainly are taken into account like origin of the reality and its topologies, geometries. And also the fact to consider extradiemnsions seem not correct because we have just a 3D fractalisations for the scales at my humble opinion.

The subgroups or groups can be ranked with the lie E8 for example but the problem is really the philosophical origin of our universe from the fields in 1D at this planck scale. I discussed with specialists of the E8 and strings or geometrodynamists, they have not successed to quantify this QG even with subgroups and the non commutativity and non associativity added. The works of Connes have been taken into account and added to this E8 with cosmic strings of this GR, but that does not permit to renormalise, I have quantify it in thinking beyond the box with 3D spheres like foundamental objects and in encoding the cold dark matter .

Could you tell me more please about the algebras utilised and the mathematical methods. I have seen that Wilczek has made a paper about the noise of gravitons,but the gravitons are not the quanta of gravitational waves for me simply, the problem seems to consider only this GR like the only one piece and the fields like origin philosophical of our universe.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 14:16 GMT

If I can, you could consider my theory of spherisation and the 3D quantum and cosmological spheres and the 3 finite primoridal series because they turn these spherical volumes and so the spinors can be better understood in ranking them when they merge these 3 series, one space vacuum for the main codes and the two fuels, photons and cold dark matter. See that the motions, rotations, oscillations vibrations of these spheres can permit to rank all considering that the volumes are preserved and that the number primoridal does not change. The dimensions are not necessary to change, the pure 3D seem the key.We just fractalise this 3D.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 14:34 GMT

Personally I like your ideas and general works, I just explain how I see these spinors, I understand your method in taking the complex vector space and the euclidian space and the minkowski spacetime and this GR. So it is a beautiful general method. The real secret maybe is to find the main cause of these spinors and rotations , and these spheres and their different volumes answer when we consider 3 main spacetimes , aethers, and a superfluidity.

If we take the lorentz transformations and my reasoning in superimposing the two other ethers , it becomes very relevant. N fact it becomes simple generally considering the angular momentum and so the rotations spinal and orbital of these 3D spheres, see that the 3 finite primoridal series have the same number finite than the cosmological spheres, and it is the dirac large number, so the fact that this number and the volumes are preserved when they merge to cretae the matter become very interesting in these 3 spacetimes superimposed because all is in contact.

I guess that you have utilised the clifford algebras probably for the groups and subgroups but it seems important to preserve this 3D , that said the hopf fibrations can be put on the surfaces of 3D spheres and the bloch spheres can be utilised, but the main importance is the motions of these spherical volumes and the densities.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 14:48 GMT

You know professor Hamilton, I am not on FQXi to give lessons, no I learn a lot here and I just imporve my theory and I want also to give food for thoughts to improve the works of thinkers seraching deep answers, I believe strongly that these 3D spheres are the foundamental mathematical and physical objects and that they are the choice of this universe, that is why I consider a conjecture philosophical between these strings and these spheres, between also the 3D and the extradimensions.

The philosophy of the origin of the universe seems essential and I have remarked that the majority of searchers consider these strings or points at this planck scale and only the GR like the only one piece of puzzle. Maybe Einstein and Witten even in being genius have created a prison, we must I beleive insert deeper logics and the two other spacetimes of the cold dark matter and the DE for me are the keys with the spheres to explain our main unknowns.

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

show all replies (1 not shown)

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 17:06 GMT

What I find very relevant in your work is the dirac equation inserted , now inagine that we have the two others spacetimes superimposed and imagine that we have this superfluidity for the spacetimes because all is in contact due to these specific series of 3D spheres sen t from the central cosmological sphere , a kind of super matter energy , the informations are sent from there and if we take series having the dirac large number beginning with a central sphere the biggest volumes and farer we decrease around the volumes and increase the number, so the space disappears between these spherical volumes, and that implies this superfluidity where all is in contact in fact. That permits to understand the waves, particles and fields.

What I find relevant is that the main codes are in this space vacuum of this DE , and that the two others are fuels , the photons and cold dark matter, and when they merge they create the topologies, geometries, matters, fields, and properties of matter because the fuels permit to activate this space vaccuum coded. That is why we have this diversity of matters. So that is why I consider a pure 3D at all scales, and like you can see I don t consider so that the GR is the only one spacetime and that the fields are the origin of this physicality, so it is not photons and strings inside in 1D osicllations wich create the physicality. The lie E8 exceptional group is interesting for the groups and subgroups but I have invented the spherical geometrical topological algebras , a tool permitting to superimpose all this with the spheres. The dirac equation can be extrapolated and improved in superimposing the two others spacetimes. The aim in my model so is not to unify G c and h only but unify all, the DE and DM also more the consciousness. That is why I have this equation, an assumption, E =m(c^2+Xl^2)+ Y with X a parameter correlated with the cold and l the linear velocity, Y is a paranmeter correlated with the DE, I have reached the quantum gravitation like this in considering ehe cold dark matter encoded and I have taken different distances, not the protons and electrons , a fith force appears also .

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

hide replies

Member Antony Garrett Lisi wrote on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 18:48 GMT

Hello Andrew, I'm interested in your statement that the spin(11,1) algebra contains the standard-model and Dirac algebras as commuting subalgebras. Could you possibly send a pre-print of your paper ("Unification of the four forces in the spin(11,1) geometric algebra") to me at Gar@Li.si or post it here, so I can have a look at the mathematical details? (Sorry the PRD referee was a jerk, but I'm not surprised.)

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 19:04 GMT

Hi, have you thought to the things that I have explained to David Chester , I don t know if he has told you but if the fields are not the origin of the physicality , so there is a problem philosophical even with the E8 , you can utilise the groups, subgroups , commutativity, non commutativity, associativity, non associativity, never the quantum gravitation will appear you know even with the works added of Connes, the real problem is this prison of strings, or geometrodynamics and the fact to only consider this GR like primoridal essence.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 19:25 GMT

The General idea of this E8 was a good choice , like the other lie groups. The matrix and others like the mathematical plays can permit to rank and understand these fields to unify the GR and the QM, the problem is not there. But between us , why can we affirm that these photons are the only one piece of puzzle and this GR ? I can understand the ideas philosophical, the majority of thinkers have considered an infinite heat before this hypothetical BB , and after with their own personal philosophies in believing in god or in a mathematical accident, they have considered 1D strings at this planck scale inside these photons and after they have with different geonetrical algebras like hopf, clifford, lie , they explain the geometries, topologies, fields, matters emergent and after with the strings, superstrings, Mtheory branes or geometrodynamics, they have extrapolated extradimensions like in the strings 10D, 11D, 26D and they try to renormalise the quantum gravitation and unify the four forces but what I try to explain is that we cannot affirm that this GR and the fields are the origin of our physicality. Furthermore all the best thinkers have played with all the mathematical tools to reach and quantify this QG , but nobody has successed, it is because the philosophy general does not seem to be correct and the foundamental objects also. When I tell that it is a prison , it is a prison this GR and the fields. Now all the thinkers turn in round in trying to go farer , but the deep unknowns are not explained.

When I have discovered you TOE in the past I told me it is a good general work but let s be logic, a toe is not possible to create due to many limitations and our young age at this universal scale, we know nothing still, how can we create a toe, even my theory I don t consider it like a toe because the details to add are incredibly complex.

We are a community very vanitious and all we are persiuaded and we dislike to be contredicted , it is due to fact that we have studied a lot and want to be innovative, I am a problem with my 3D psheres and this spherisation of the universe, I know it. But let s recognise that the general philosophical and ontological origin of this universe, nobody can affrim it, the same for the foundamental objects. We are in a global crisis inside the theoretical sciences community and the maths can imply many confusions also, it is due to fact that we have more difficuklties actually to find the unknownms than 100 years ago .

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 19:46 GMT

In resume, these works are interesting for the tensors and spinors in the mathematics of this GR, the metrics, the derivatives, this and that , ok it is very interesting for this spacetime of this GR. The thinkers have tried to develop the general relativity and einstein field equations, but why they consider that the standard model and the emergence of topologies and geometries come from this ? there I don t understand, I have difficulties to understand why the thinkers in majority consider this GR and photons only and these fields to explain our standard model and all the mechanisms of this universe. It is odd in fact.

report post as inappropriate

show all replies (4 not shown)

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 19:55 GMT

You are going to better understand , the problem is also that it lacks this cold dark matter and the dark energy correctly added to the EFE , einstein in his equation consider the einstein tensor Gab + the cosmological constant gab =8piG/c^4 Tab, so the problem comes from the fact that it lacks things to superimpose and a better interpretation of the space vacuum of this DE anti gravitational , it is because the persons observe with photons and cannot observe the two other logics superimposed , the cosmological constant is not well interpreted . So the metric tensors also. The problem is there , the cosmological constant and the dark matter .....and the fact that the fields are not the main cause of our topologies, geometries,

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 18, 2021 @ 20:22 GMT

we arrive at several foundamental problems, the foundamental objects, the philosophical origin of the universe, the cold dark matter balancing, and the cosmological constant or this DE the anti gravitational push of this space vacuum. See that in my model I differenciate the 3 main series of 3D spheres, one for the space vacuum, the main codes and the two fuels , the photons and the cold dark matter and when they merge they create the topologies, matters, geometries, fields of our stamdard model. So the problems are essential and the meaning of this DE this cosmological constant also , like the dark matter also, but the fact that the DE implies an accelerating universe is essential also for the calculations of this cosmological constant. That implies a relevance, the evolution appears and we can extrapolate the future of this universe in considering the space vacuum disponible and the cold dark matter, we shall have in logic an accel deccel towards the maximum spherical volume and after an accel deccel towards the minimum balanced volume , the paradox is the gravitation. The empty space so is more than we can imagine and the fields are not the solution for me, the fields are due to photons and this cold dark matter. The secret of our topologies, geometries, matters, fields is in this space vacuum of this DE so and not in this GR .It is very important what I tell at my humble opinion, that changes all in fact.

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 24, 2021 @ 13:39 GMT

Here is an important thing also, The hierarchy problem is important and the most important is how we analyse it.

The main problem of non renormlisations come from the strings and branes and still this problem philosophical of this GR alone taken into account.

That is why the cosmological conatnt problem and the QG are not solved .

That comes from the supersymmetric solutions of couplings and higgs fields and Dirac fields. What I tell is that we must superimpose two other logics, the 2 other aethers and we can respect the lagrangians.

The main importance is that the fermions and bosons are just emergent from this space vacuum coded. The superpartners can be better understood and the antimatter also in considering the two fuels that I explained. If you consider the extradimensions of strings, you imply of confusions with the GR alone also because the respect of the newtonian mechanic must be real and it is foundamental.

That implies a logic about how we intepreta the mass and its origin. The weakest force does not appear in the extradiemnsions due to a loss of flux in resume. That is why the einstein fields equations and the extradiemensions of branes and the planck scale don t give the answers. Hope I am understood in all humility. We need to superimpose the 3 ethers and we need to consider a pure 3D and foundamental objects , particles in a superfluidity to solve the problems.

All this permits to have the good groups and their couplings in considering 3 main system , we can maybe consider 3 E8 and these series of Spheres 3D instead of points or strings. But the most important is to take into account the main codes in this space vacuum and harmonise the equations of einstein about this cosmological constant because the supersymmetry of fields like origin and the EFE and strings don t permit to solve the problem of this cosmological constant and don t permit to quantify this weakest quantum force.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 25, 2021 @ 17:26 GMT

Let s try to analyse the two main theories relevant I recognise it , the general relativity of einstein permitting to understand the gravitation being under the energies sources a curvature of the spacetime like being in a gravitational field, it is a pseudo riemanian variety so and the equation is considered of einstein , ok and the other remarkable theory is the quantum theory and more precisely the quantum field theory mainly improved by dirac also, both have been proved having many things correct .

I dont critic or is against these two foundamental theories, I just explain that they cannot explain all our unknowns, we see well that the cosmological constant problem, the quantum gravitation, or the interior of BHs have anomalies . It is due to fact that deeper paramaters must be superimposed to solve these anomalies in extreme gravitational potential for example, we have the same problem for the origin and the begining of this universe if we consider only this GR.

It is not that this GR is uncomplete but need others parameters added , it is not the main chief orchestra of this universe in fact simply. It is just a part that we actually observe due to photons. The energies and densities become so problematic because we consider G c and h, and it is not the road , the planck scale is a problem and the photons and c also. It is not so about the minkowski space time and the pseudo riemannian metric in fact , it is there that this time and the observations imply a problem.

If we consider a boson like the graviton and only this GR and the fields , so the divergences and infinite quantities cannot be solved . That is why it is not renormalisable, that implies the necessity to consider the main codes of this space vacuum and the balance of this cold , the DM being encoded also.

You can see easily that if you don t make this , you are going to have interactions of gravitons with themselves implying this non renormalisation due to infinite quantities in resume, if you don t consider a deeper logic added, it is not possible. You can try with the extradiemnsions, the non commutativity, the loops, the twistors, and all the mathematical tools possible, that will not change the problem of non renormalisation and quantification. The infinite quantities and the singularities shall not disappear in resume simply without these two ethers superimposed.

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

hide replies

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 19, 2021 @ 10:06 GMT

Professor Hamilton, what I find very relevant is that you consider the spinors like the main cause , I see that you consider so links with the branes and that you consider only this GR and so the photons like the only one piece of this universal puzzle. Your method is very relevant and if I can it could be well to consider these 3D spheres and their volumes and the 3 primoridal series that I explained because they rotate these spherical volumes in a superfluidity. My humble model can permit to explain deep unknowns with some mathematical tools. The philosophy becomes important , like you see I consider coded particles in a superfluidity for these spacetimes superimposed and so the topologies, geometries emerge from the deformations of spheres, it is not a kind of ricci flow of this GR , but the codes of this spacevacuum and the two fuels merging wich permit the deformations, the symplectomorphisms preserving the volumes can be utilised.

If the universe has chosen these Spheres like foundamental objects and that the central cosmological BH , a thing that we cannot define send these finite series and that this center is a kind of super matter energy able to send all kind of informations, that becomes relevant, because the two fuels, the cold dark matter and the photons permit to activate the matter and permit to create all the diversity of matters more an evolution.

See that if the universe comes from an infinite eternal consciousness in 0D beyond the physicality , that becomes relevant because this thing that we cannot define needs a center , a kind of main transformator physically speaking, maybe this infinity had just this solution to transform and code. We need a system inside a finite evolutive universe because I have remarked that philosophically speaking the strings or geometrodynamics to create the topologies, matters, geometries with the fields have an enormous philosophical and ontological problem. In a reductor analysis, why if this thing has created with oscillations a so complex universe, this thing has not created a more perfect system quickly, and why this thing does not stop with oscillations the sufferings or a murderer in a simplistic point of vue. If a so complex universe with more than 10000 billions of galaxies has been able to create this with oscillations and fields, so why we evolve and why this universe has not been perfect quickly, so there is a enormous philosophical problems with the strings, branes,....

See now that your spinors can be improved in considering the finite primoridal series that I explained because the 3D seems the choice of the universe and the spheres also, I have chosen the dirac large number for these series because I have calculated the cosmological number is the same, it is like a primoridal finite serie. The spinors so can be detailed in this superfluidity because they rotate and the volumes and densities more the other properties become relevant . The center of these series if the biggest volume, because I have remarked that more we go towards the centers cosmologically speaking, more these volumes increase, and the relevance is that the space disappears between these spheres if you decrease the volumes around the center and increase the number.So the waves, particles, fields can be explained proportionallyn speaking.

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 19, 2021 @ 11:03 GMT

It is this conjecture wich become relevant between particles fields , Extradimensions and 3D, strings and spheres and geometrical algebras of clifford and lie and my spherical geometrical topological algebras that I have invented .

The two other spacetimes superimposed and these finite series of 3D spheres become relevant for the rankings to arrive at these unknowns and conjecture. We know that the E8 is relevant and the superstrings for the dimensionalities, but in taking the 3D and in considering the fractalisations of scales, so it is possible. The aim being to find the real proportions of this 3D with the roots of geometrical algebras , E8XE8XE8 in replacing so the points or strings by these series finite are interesting.

All could be ranked with the roots, matrix, vectors, scalars, commutativity, non commutativity, associativity, non associativity, the volumes, the senses or rotations, the oscillations of these spheres, the densities, the angles, the spinors, the tensors....in considering not only the GR like spactime but the two others also.And in considering also the evolution, it is the meaning of my theory of spherisation, an optimisation evolution of the universal sphere or future spheres with quant and cosmol 3D spheres, the quaternions aldso are important for the time and the motions.

All becomes important for the subalgebras and these spheres , the grand unification must not only consider G c and h , the aim is not to unify the QFT of our standard model and the GR and the QM, we need to unify the GR, the dark matter, the DE space vacuum, the consciousness, the QFT and the quantum gravitation , a fith force even appears. All is a question of ranking of a pure 3D in resume in fractalising correctly the scales.

The roots system appear with the spherical geometrical topological algebras if we have the good finite primoridal serie and how these series merge together to create our reality. The spinors appear because they rotate these 3D spheres simply. Imagine the complexity of all these spheres with different motions, rotations, volumes....Even the body mind soul problem can be reached about the sortings and encodings of informations and what is really our uniqueness.

view post as summary

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 19, 2021 @ 17:13 GMT

Ps to both of you Professor Hamilton and Professor Lisi, I d be honored if you could be also in the boat for the project GLOBAL COLLABORATION that FQXI has nicely accepted to create, I know that you see the generality of this universe and the universal altruism because your works are profound so you understand what is this consciousness, the aim is to create a book of concrete adapted global solutions where all wins and convice the united nations, hope you shall write some ideas dear thinkers, congract for your works also,

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 22, 2021 @ 20:19 GMT

Professor Hamilton , it is there that my intuitive equation becomes important considering the energy of this space vacuum of the DE, here is the equation considering the DM cold also encoded in nuclei, E=m(c^2+Xl^2)+ Y , with X a parameter correlated with the cold of this dark matter that I don t know and l their linear velocities, and Y is the dark energy the space vacuum where the main codes are in one of 3 series of 3D spheres that I explained. The lorentz works could help for this Y but I don t know how do to be frank , I have some ideas but it is not easy alone to solve this cosmological constant problem. The QFT is important more the quantum gravitational field that I have reached with this cold dark matter encoded but I don t know how to unify all this with this space vacuum of this DE, the harmonic oscillators could help . The importance at my humble opinion is that this space if made of particles, these 3D spheres coded but it is a new physics like this DM encoded also, I need help because alone and without experiments I have difficulties to have the calculations.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 26, 2021 @ 18:24 GMT

We have a problem with the Black holes and we don t know well what they are , but all galaxies possess a supermassive BH at the center and in logic they are a new physics beyond this relativity. They are probably correlated with this cold dark matter also but I don t affirm. Now if we have a serie of BHs at this comsological scale, like the quantum series are a little bit in the same reasoning , we have a serie of quantum BHs farer for me than these nuclear forces. I don t know if we can consider a fith force, but maybe.Now like the universe we have a central one and it is essential to understand the distribution and codes of this supermatter energy of this space vacuum, and if the photons and cold dark matter are encoded in this vacuum possessing the main codes to create what it must become, that becomes relevant because we can take instead of distances protons and electrons, we can take the distances of BHs and positrons , see what appears in the calculation of the force ..... This reasoning solves the BHs , the DE, the DM, the QG, and others also.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 26, 2021 @ 19:26 GMT

We must after all vanish the singularities, solve the cosmological constant problem, understand the DM and dark energy and unify the whole with even the consciousness and the quantum gravitation and the GR .The actual QFT and GR like if we unified G c and h cannot .

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 27, 2021 @ 10:10 GMT

Professor Hamilton, I relisten your youtube and I like it , it is a very good general idea, but if I can you tell that the spinors are the smallest quanta and that all emerge from spinors. I can understand the idea knowing well the complex vectors space . See that in my model the spinors can be correlated with the rotating 3D psheres of these 3 ethers superimposed, so we retrun still about the philosophical origin and how we must take into account this main cause of our topologies, geometries, matters and fields. If you take the GR alone , and these smallest quanta at this planck scale of this GR , so I see what you make like general work. But if the foundamental objects are nor points, or strings and that the spinors are more than we can imagine due to these 3D spheres , so it is the general philosophy the problem to explain our unknowns. It is always this problem of GR alone taken into account and the fields like origin of this reality from this GR.

These spinors can be linked with the 3 ethers that I explained and imagine the complexity when we consider the different volumes and the symplectomorsphisms preserving these volumes more the velocities of rotations, the angular momentum, the angles of rotations, this and that, imagine the properties appearing and they can be ranked and the proportions can respect our pure deterministic physics.

The 3D spheres of these 3 ethers superimposed seem the best way for me to understand these rotations, we speak about the rotations but in fact the best shape for this is this sphere .

There is a relevance if we consider the hopf fibrations on surfaces for the oscillations vibrations in 2D nd the rotations them are in 3D simply. We can utilise the clifford algebras for this also and imrpove them and add also the lie E8 in superimposing 3 E8, imagine all what we can rank. I just give a general logic , I know that the persons work hard about their ideas, I know also that I am a problem for some thinkers but let s be logic and let s go beyond our vanities, what I tell is logic , the universe seems to have chosen these 3D spheres like foundamental obbjects and I repeat it d be odd to consider the photons and this GR like the only one piece of puzzle. If the thinkers since that this GR exists cannot solve the main unknowns, it is because they turn in round in this GR and forget to add deeper logics superimposed. I give a new road simply with humility, I want in fact that mathematicans more skilling than me for the maths analyse all this and ponder revolutionary works.

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 28, 2021 @ 19:40 GMT

Some ideas still ,It is the same with other methods,the hopf algebras correlated with the feynman diagrams for example, for the morphisms and groups and you can even make cohomologies for the lie groups , the problem is not there, don t forget that if you take a general method for the fields and their rankings, it is not a reason to be sure about the extrapolations with the algebras utilised towards the unknowns wich are probably non relativistic and also in a different logic, furthermore you can take the dimensions and begin with a 3D and after make with the strings and algebras the 1D and the other dimensions and tend towards the infinite dimensionalities, that will not change the problem of foundamental objects that we don t know and the scales that we cannot see and reach physically and the same for the general philosophy of the origin of the universe. The fields can imply confusions and the diagrams also utilised even if they are correct at our observable scales. Let s take the lagrangian, it can be superimposed and fractalised in function of what we analyse and the groups also must be correlated, but the potentials are different and the kinetic distributions so also , it is the universal foundamental lagrangian the secret, not the actual one due to our QFT and GR....

It is really the philosophy general and the foundamental objects in fact the real problem, we don t know it.

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Apr. 1, 2021 @ 12:08 GMT

I give some food for thoughts, one of my favorite thinkers is Von Neumann, he was for me and it is just my opinion one of the most incredible general genius, his works are so relevant and concrete. I have studied them and his concept of entropy is fascinating , that has permited to go farer than Gibbs,Shannon, or the entropy in thermodynamics correlating with this quantum mechanics. I try to find a road in unifying all the entropies with the 3 main finite primoridal series and this space vacuum of this DE for the main codes are the key. We can so superimpose the entropies and rank the properties of these spherical volumes and the relevance is probably the preserving volumes and the densities implying proportions with the motions oscillations and also deformations with the symplectomorphisms.

That can permit to rank these entropies and we take so the relative entropies, the conditional ones, the others also and we insert also the two fuels that I explained, the photons and cold dark matter, several foundamental unknowns can be solved like the cosmological constant problem, the quantum gravitation that I have reached like this, the hierarchy problem, the gluons probem, the singularities problem...in fact we see a general road with this space vacuum possessing the main codes and the ranking of waves, fields, particles can be better understood without taking like main origin the fields, but the particles in a superfluidity yes.

The informations so also can be better understood and the most important why they are what they are and how they permit the physicality and its topologies, geometries. That implies a simple general logic where the extradiemnsions are not necessary and where a pure cklassical mechanics in 3D appear.

report post as inappropriate

Jack James wrote on Apr. 5, 2021 @ 22:42 GMT

I noticed this was a 4 dimensional approach also.

https://pullthatupjamie.com/

Could you explain the difference?

post approved