Singh’s quantum matter gravity (QMG) unification of gravity and charge is a very exciting development and is especially so for me since QMG has many of the same puzzle pieces as does my quantum matter action universe puzzle. Basically, QMG defines aikyon particles as the generic aether of the universe and so QMG builds electrons, protons, neutrons, and all else with either fermion or boson...

view entire post

Singh’s quantum matter gravity (QMG) unification of gravity and charge is a very exciting development and is especially so for me since QMG has many of the same puzzle pieces as does my quantum matter action universe puzzle. Basically, QMG defines aikyon particles as the generic aether of the universe and so QMG builds electrons, protons, neutrons, and all else with either fermion or boson aikyons. An 8-D octanion matrix represents each fermion and boson and has the correct quantum spin symmetry for both charge and gravity.

Then QMG uses Connes time, tau, and classical Euclidean or atomic time emerges from QMG. As a result, QMG defines a new constant of tau = 1.0e17 s or 3.2 Byrs, but in Connes time, not atomic time. Alain Connes proposed tau as thermodynamic time, i.e. entropy or temperature time, as have many others in the past. This is a universe or cosmic time that defines the evolution of the universe and so now QMG cosmic time is different from atomic time.

Another key to QMG is in continuous spontaneous localization, CSL, which is a very well know theory for the collapse of the quantum wavefunction conundrum. So CSL is how the reality of classical gravity relativity emerges from QMG. That is very fun…

The 1e-39th scaling between gravity and charge emerges from the ratio (L/Lp)^2, and both L and Lp are characteristic lengths that each come from known constants. The Planck length is Lp and QMG length L is hslash / (m c), a characteristic length that scales as 1 / mass times hslash / c.

Dark matter simply emerges as a vector gravity from QMG and does not therefore need a new particle at all. However, there are many pesky singularities with various aspects of QMG as Singh repeatedly notes, but QMG does manage to dodge the renormalization problem for gravity in quantum field theory.

Octonions are eight dimensional matrices that unify gravity and charge in a QMG 8-D space. Instead of atomic time, Singh uses thermodynamic or entropy time, tau, which was proposed by Alain Connes and so Singh calls tau Connes time, but many others have proposed entropy as the time arrow as well. Of course, the classical evolution of the universe is what drives thermodynamics and entropy and so Connes time is also equivalent to a universe cosmic time as well.

The deep dive of QMG into octonion algebra is quite complex and it is not yet clear if the really simple QMG assumptions really justifies the rabbit hole of octonionic complexification. A classical 4-D spacetime emerges from the QMG trace of just half of the 8-D octonion matrix and then quantum spin emerges from the other octonion 4-D half. The QMG introduces 4-D aikyons to represent fundamental octonion fermion and boson particles along with QMG length (L), gauge (alpha), and fermi matrices (beta1, beta2). Each 4-D fermion has progress variables that scale with QMG L, qF and fermion mass from momentum of velocity qdotF and each 4-D boson is on a path, qB with boson mass qdotB. The dot above the q is a single derivative in Coones time, which is velocity in 8-D QMG space and velocity is proportional to momentum and therefore mass. Likewise qddot is the double derivative, which is acceleration and proportional to 8-D force.

The next step is to renormalize qB and qF into q1 and q2 to make things pretty and avoid some ugly math...with an even deeper rabbit hole, so buckle up. The QMG aikyons are now either commutating bosons [qB,pB] from which classical gravity relativity emerges or noncommuting fermions {qF,pF} as quantum field theory emerges. The QMG paths q1 and q2 now have both symmetric and antisymmetric superpositions as well as momenta, from which mass emerges a la Higgs boson.

Now these renormalized paths and momenta show the classic quantum uncertainty noncommutation: [p,q] = -ihslash...so voilá! The Hamiltonian wave equation follows with frequency eigenvalues and quantum oscillating phase wavefunctions ...oops, QMG still has some convergence issues hiding here and there...and so there are many more papers to write…

The QMG goes down a very deep rabbit hole because multiplying 8-D matrices results in two 64-D matrices with a total of 128 matrix elements. Wow! This will be a lot of papers in the future...

Although QMG has many of the features of quantum gravity, it is not yet completely clear if the complexity of octonion algebra is really necessary for quantum gravity. After all, matter action has many of the same features, but only uses 3-D, not 8-D. However, the dimensions of matter, action, and quantum phase unite gravity and charge into a very nice quantum universe with a Lagrangian, density matrix, and creation/annihilation operators, and so on. The quantum matter action causal set has all of the properties such as a Lagrangian for action. Quantum matter action also shows that dark matter emerges as a vector gravity force, not a new particle.

The matter action photon is the basic dipole exchange particle for charge and the universe biphoton is the basic quadrupole exchange particle for gravity. Just like the QMG aikyon, matter action has a pervasive aether particle that makes up the whole universe. Matter action aether particle comes from the universe pulse time, tau. Instead of using the dimensionless QMG L / Lp for gravity scaling and QMG Connes time, tau, matter action uses the dimensionless scaling of the universe radius over the Bohr radius, Ru / Rb. Thus, instead of an arbitrary QMG L, matter action defines the universe radius.

Connes or entropy time represents the primary QMG quantum time dimension, tau = 1e17 s or 3.2 Byrs. Matter action universe time is tau = 1.2e-17 s, but comes from the time pulse of the universe size, Ru. Atomic time emerges from both QMG and matter action as the classical time of gravity relativity, and so the second primary dimension of universe time plays a key role in quantum gravity relativity.

Finally, the QMG length L is inversely proportional to particle mass and so for hydrogen, L = 2.2e-16 m, which turns out to be too small for CSL hydrogen. Matter action defines the characteristic CSL length as 7.0e-8 m, which is the radius at which hydrogen dipole-induced dipole attraction, which goes as 1/R^-6, equals hydrogen-hydrogen gravity attraction, which goes as 1/R^-2. Thus matter action completely agrees with CSL while QMG L for hydrogen CSL seems to be a billion times too small.

Finally, Science has a truly significant unification with Singh's QMG. It is very pleasing to finally see this happen, but Science will now fight the QMG revolution fiercely as well it should...eventually, Science will accept something simpler than QMG to finally show unification at last...

view post as summary

Hi Tejinder, It is a beautiful paper about the octonions and jordan works. You try to generalise this GR and QM and rank our standard model in considering an octonionic universe respecting so the fields and the general relativity. Like I said before , this kind of works is respectable and interesting to better understand our QFT, that said like I explained, we cannot affirm that this GR is the...

view entire post

Hi Tejinder, It is a beautiful paper about the octonions and jordan works. You try to generalise this GR and QM and rank our standard model in considering an octonionic universe respecting so the fields and the general relativity. Like I said before , this kind of works is respectable and interesting to better understand our QFT, that said like I explained, we cannot affirm that this GR is the only one piece of puzzle and that the fields are the origin of our universe. The string theorists and geometrodynamists forcus all on this with different maths and fractalise or extrapolate the dimensions like with the strings begining in 1D , after 10D for the bosonic strings or 26D or others in function of mathematical tools utilised. So they consider all that we have a 1D at this planck scale connected with this GR and a 1D cosmic field and the photons and oscillations vibrations inside. oK we understand this and even we can insert the kaluz Klein theory and the 5D, but what I try to explain is that this GR is probably not the rpimordial essence and the photons so also, they are just for me particles encoded in a the vaccuum giving us the electromagntism and the heat and they permit also to observe, because without light we don t observe. I like also the beauty of these E8 octonions and the play of persons in maths about them trying with the non commutativity to complete our standard model. But what I try to explain is that the points or strings and these extradimensions begining in 1D are just a general assumption. Of course they can permit with several symmetries and maths plays to explain better the bosonic fields, but the universe is not an octonionic universe, the fields are just emergent , what we must find is the main origin of this universe and I doubt it is from fields and oscillations of photons, we need to understand the vacuum , for me the main codes are there in the spacevacuum of this dark energy and these series of 3D spheres in my model after ar activated and becomes what they must become due to these photons encoded giving us the bosonic fields and the 3 main forces known and also the cold dark matter is encoded and permit to give the antiparticles and the gravitational quantum fields and also a fith force appears due to a serie of quantum BHs farer than our nuclear forces. I know that the thinkers are persuaded and have difficulties to change a line of reasoning but between us, I doubt that this universe has only created photons and that this GR is the only one piece, furthermore the dimensions can respect the pure 3D at all scales and this planck scale is just an assumption also due to maths, so it was the main problem to reach the quantum gravitation, utilise by curiosity and see the results the forces between these quantum BHs and the positrons , see what appears, the QG simply because we must consider not the protons and electrons, change the distances simply and respect the newtonian mechanics. See the calculations of the force. The problem of the majority of searchers is to consider only this GR , strings or geometrodynamics and also these E8 and fields like origin. It is the biggest error for me of thinkers, they turn in round in trying to explain the deep unknowns, but nothing, they just complete a litteö bit our standard model and its bosonic fields and they try just to complete this GR, they forget to think beyond the box. I liked your paper and I respect the maths utilised, I just explain that it is not sufficient to explain our unknowns. G c and h are not sufficient to explain this QG. Best regards, happy new year also.

view post as summary

Hi Jonathan, all this is interesting indeed , Connes we know him is the best for this non commutativity , and Tejinder has made a beautiful paper with these octonions, they are a good tool. But and there is a but lol, I repeat, we cannot confound the relevance of this tool to better understand our bosonic fields and the main origin of our reality, I repeat even if you are persuaded about your...

view entire post

Hi Jonathan, all this is interesting indeed , Connes we know him is the best for this non commutativity , and Tejinder has made a beautiful paper with these octonions, they are a good tool. But and there is a but lol, I repeat, we cannot confound the relevance of this tool to better understand our bosonic fields and the main origin of our reality, I repeat even if you are persuaded about your philosophy general of this universe. We are not sure thet the only one piec3 of puzzle is the GR and that the fields are the origin of our reality creating the topologies, geometries. I d like to have your general philosophy, please explain us, do you consider really that this infinite eternal consciousness for example is an infinite heat and that the photons and points or strings inside oscillating in 1D are the answer, be frank, develop your general idea please. I agree that the works of connes are interesting , the evolution in my model is essential and I don t consider that it comes from the maths but from coded particles , the time is irreversible on this entropical arrow of time and it is a thing emergent due to motions rotations of these particles for me, so why we must consider the fields and the maths of these octonions like the answer of our reality ? it is really a fashion in fact, I beleive that the thinkers have forgotten to consider the particles instead of fields, you know , the particles are not a problem, they are in contact explaining the fields and waves if we apply specific finite series of 3D spheres in begining with the biggest central volume and after we decrease tyhe volumes and increase the number with the dirac large number, now consider 3 main finite series coded, one for thje main codes, thje space vacuum and the two fuels that I explained , the photons and the cold dark matter and when they merge they create the electrm and gravitat fields, it is not a problem in this reasoning also to gfractalise the fields with the octonions if you want but the general philosophy is different about the origin. Why this fashion of fields ? explain me and please detail your answer. The einstein fields equations and his GR seems the problem and the works of witten it seems to me, it is really a prison now for me.

view post as summary

Here are some missing pieces...

It turns out to be easy to coax automatic evolution out of infinite degrees of freedom and finitely reducible uncertainty alone. So in some ways; Tomita was just stating the obvious, or Connes was making plain something that should be apparent to Physics folks right away. The idea is that if you are working from an infinite range of variations, or infinite...

view entire post

Here are some missing pieces...

It turns out to be easy to coax automatic evolution out of infinite degrees of freedom and finitely reducible uncertainty alone. So in some ways; Tomita was just stating the obvious, or Connes was making plain something that should be apparent to Physics folks right away. The idea is that if you are working from an infinite range of variations, or infinite possibilities; pretty much anything is possible, ..almost! But nothing is quite actually real or truly possible without an evolutive process.

If we approach it from the Quantum-Mechanical view; some of this becomes possible to explicate simply. John Klauder eloquently explained at FFP15 that we can see Quantum Mechanics as a projection from an infinite dimensional Hilbert space onto a 2-d surface with specific well-defined properties. He went on to explain that we can obtain enhanced quantization by lifting the target space or varying it in ways that let us see hidden details. This is like constructing conformal field theories to fit the need.

We can relate this back to Connes' remarks that the really fun evolutive stuff happens when degrees of freedom become infinite but this must be mapped onto finite-dimensional spaces and relations. My guess is it does not happen all at once, but proceeds in stages respecting all possible forms up and down the dimensions. This expands on themes developed by my departed friend Ray Munroe - that both the simplest and most complex forms possible in Math inform Physics - informed by works of other departed friends, F.D. 'Tony' Smith and my Physics mentor Greg Kirk.

Bimetric Convergence is a term I have coined for a scenario where dimensionality is at first unconstrained, ranging from 0-d to infinite dimensions, and was both bottom-up and top-down limited - until cosmological transitions constrain the upper and lower limit of dimensions. The linked published paper explains a little better.

Best,

Jonathan

view post as summary

I have discussed about this with several persons working with the octonions, the E8 and the G2. All this is interesting because it pexists probably a kind of conjecture about the fields or the 3D spheres like origin. The actual cosmology that we analyse is unfortunally limited, due to fact that we can only observe the photonic spacetime , the BB is an assumption and maybe we have a deeper logic...

view entire post

I have discussed about this with several persons working with the octonions, the E8 and the G2. All this is interesting because it pexists probably a kind of conjecture about the fields or the 3D spheres like origin. The actual cosmology that we analyse is unfortunally limited, due to fact that we can only observe the photonic spacetime , the BB is an assumption and maybe we have a deeper logic than this BB. I have studied also several papers about this inflation and BB cosmology and the GR. If I can , the shape of this universe seems a key , a sphere or not or a future sphere and why and how? I liked the explainations of Alan guth about this inflation. I consider personally an expansion of the space due to the multiplications of these finite primordial quantum series of 3D spheres having the dirac large number, the same I have calculated than our finite cosmological serie of 3D spheres. The singularity being this central cosmological sphere being a thing beyond our understanding, a kind of supermatter energy able to create all infornations with these finite quantum series having codes , this supermatter energy so is a matter energy possessing all the mendeleev table and the energies , and so the distribution of matters is in function of codes and the 3 series that I explained, the fuels permitting to activate the space vacuum.It is the DE , this spacevacuum Jonathan simply.See that that implies a logic that we cam predict seen the dark energy and dark matter disponible and the spherisation in my model, all can be unified in all humility and that can complete logically the standard model.I don t affirm that the universe is a sphere actually but it will be a sphere or is maybe allready a sphere, and that implies an acceleration decceleration towards the maximum volume spherical and after an acceleration decceleration towards the minimum balanced spherical volumes, it is a little bit this also the meaning of my model of spherisation, it is an evolution of this universe, see that at tghis quantum scales it evolves, that is why also this consciousness evolves, but it is an other story.

view post as summary

Hi to both of you,

Lorraine ,indeed the humans like to dream and imagine fantasies, they create, it is very well for the arts but we have this also inside the sciences community and mainly in maths and physics due to symmetries or others, and the psychology and the own encodings also create these things. That is why we have so many assumptions. But a sure thing after all is that only the...

view entire post

Hi to both of you,

Lorraine ,indeed the humans like to dream and imagine fantasies, they create, it is very well for the arts but we have this also inside the sciences community and mainly in maths and physics due to symmetries or others, and the psychology and the own encodings also create these things. That is why we have so many assumptions. But a sure thing after all is that only the proved laws, axioms, equations are accepted, implying that we must take into account just this pure rational determinisn after all. We can create, imagine but we cannot affirm our assumptions.

Jonathan, the world is not perfect like we know and like I said, we can rank the humans and their psychology, comportments, philosophies, ... the world is a system with specific parameters and the humans try to adapt themselves to this system, many plays a game and are not really conscious, all what they search is to be well and so the edcation permits to play and their skillings are utilised to reach the aims, many in the leaderships think they have successed their lifes because they win a lot of money, but they have forgotten foundamental parameters .This planet is surprising I must say and it is due to our past, our primitive instincs, our educations, we have not really understood the complementarity and the cooperation, of course it exists this cooperation but not globally, it is very sad because we could be so well generally on this earth. The project that I have created is for this, to harmomise the high spheres of power , that will permit to evolve better if we improve the main global system , that will reasure the humans mainly and they shall nourrish their minds with better informations. But I ask me if this UN wants to change or are they conscious really , maybe they accept this reality and are not really anxious about the future and the generality of lifes. I find this very odd knowing that these universal truths and this energetical potential are realities. But the hope exists still fortunally.

view post as summary

Thanks for sharing Jonathan, I love the piano and guitar, I prefer to play at guitar the rock and blues mainly and jazz, but at piano I play mainly classic and jazz, I have in all humility many compositions , I love to improvise in fact , I take a gamut , and I play in function of my emotions and feelings of the moment , I love to accelerate and play quickly sometimes, the silences also are...

view entire post

Thanks for sharing Jonathan, I love the piano and guitar, I prefer to play at guitar the rock and blues mainly and jazz, but at piano I play mainly classic and jazz, I have in all humility many compositions , I love to improvise in fact , I take a gamut , and I play in function of my emotions and feelings of the moment , I love to accelerate and play quickly sometimes, the silences also are important. The music is fascinating in fact and the combinations are infinite in improvisations and never the same even with the time. The arts are important considering the creativity and the free will is correlated , that is why it is difficult to put the free will in algorythms, the consciousness also seeing the combinations and the parameters to take into account. The feelings and this universalism seems important at my opinion even when we create partitions in maths or physics, like if this consciousness permitted to converge towards this universal philosophy and its pure universal altruisn and uniqueness even considering the diversity of creations, the singularities become relevant. A melody at piano or guitar or others can be simple or complex but the most important is the harmony and the feelings , the arts permit to our minds to create things and express our heart, soul , mind, .... One of my favorites in classic is Vivaldi, when you listen the 4 seasons, wowww if you close the eyes you see the seasons and the nature. Bach is more mathematical but I love also , Mozart him are pure innocent creations of a child not polluted lol by the systems of adults, it is so pure and full of joy even. Others are more sad, or this or that . That depends of composers in fact. The same maybe for our partitions in sciences and maths, it is always after all in function of the education, the encodings, our evolution, our philosophy, our life , the environments, ....and its feelings. All roads don t go to Roma but towards this universal truth yes , and the diversity and our uniqueness are wonderfull after all, that is why the assymetries creating the unique things become relevant, and the complexity implies a kind of humility.

view post as summary