Dear Jason,

You ask: is there a theory better than string theory?

Kindly visit my homepage at www.tifr.res.in/~tpsingh

to see the quantum gravity theory I have developed.

Many thanks,

Tejinder

report post as inappropriate

Hi Tejinder, like I explained it is also a string development and octonions, so you consider also like many that the origin is made of fields and like many you fractalise these fields to explain this quantum gravitation, but all is not true if the main origin is not made of fields and that we have only a pure 3D at all scales, I respect your attemps but like many you are in this strings prison for me, regards

report post as inappropriate

why all are focused on these strings I don t know , and I know that it is difficult to change due to years of works and that this vanity is a parameter also to take into account, we are all persuaded but it could be well to think beyond the box and try to change a little bit the generalities of ideas, since that these strings exists and the attemps to explain this Quantum gravity, nobody has quantified it , because simply there is a problem with these fields and strings, it is not an emergent electromagntic force, you can utilise all what you want like geonetrical algebras and all the fractalisations of fields and the non commutativity, you don t reach it

report post as inappropriate

what I tell is that the symmetries and automorphisms shall not change this truth if the foundamental objects are not true and the origin of fields also simply, this prison of strings is really a big problem inside the sciences community,

report post as inappropriate

like I said I was surprised to reach it , in changing the distances and in respecting this newtonian mechanics, because we have a deeper logic, this gravitation seems the main chief orchestra and we need to superimpose particles encoded different simply and in 3D , not need to fractalise the fields , consider the cold Dark matetr encoded in nuclei and encircling this standard model and see the balance necessary to explain the heat cold, the +-, the negentropy entropy, the electronmagntism gravitation, the matter anti matter, the electrons positrons and others, the fact to encode kind of gravitons spherical of DM solve the problem, the simplicity sometimes is essential , the electromagntism is just emergent , we need a balance at all scales and this matter non baryonic answers, not need of strings to reach our unknowns, the 3D coded spheres are an easy way

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

You know Tejinder, I don t want to destroy the works of strings theorists, I just find odd that all is focused in these strings forgetting to think differently, I prefer to see convergences and they are possible with these 3D psheres because they are in motions, rotations oscillations and that it exists probably a conjecture with the superstrings , Mtheory and branes and maybe also the poincare conjecture helping and the ricci flow intrinsic in these coded spheres. The clifford algebras also can help and the lie groups, derivatives and algebras. It is also philosophically speaking that we can converge in considering particles coded instead of fields like main primoridal origin. I respect your works and the works of others, I just try to explain that we can think differently and beyond the box, I beleive strongly that the strings and photons only have created a prison for the thinkers and now they turn in round simply. I can understand that I irritate with my spheres but they seem foundamental at all scales and nobody can deny this, don t forget the words of Feynmann , he told , one day we shall see all the truth and we shall tell, oh my god, how is it possible that we have not seen a thing so simple before, even Ray Munroe my friend told me this, he was relevant and I respected a lot this person on FQXi I miss him, I have discussed a lot in private, he told me that I have found a innovative thing and that many was irritated due to this human nature but after all the competition is well but the complementarity is better for me, I beleive strongly that this vanity is a real global problem and more inside the theoretical sciences community, all we want to be recognised and all we are persuaded , it is sad because in complementarity we could go farer all, regards, I respect your ideas and I find many relevances in your ideas, the convergences like I told can appear if the thinkers forget to focus too much on their works and open their minds maybe simply, friendly

report post as inappropriate

I repeat this simple general intuitive idea, what are your thoughts? ....

matter and antimatter dance together to create our universal balance like an universal foundamental, this cold dark matter probably is the secret of this balance, the photons like primordial essence does not seem to be sufficient, we need a balance for the heat , like a balance electromagnetism gravitation, negentropy entropy, +-,matter anti matter,:...... and if we consider these 3D spheres and their senses of rotations and the 3 main finite series , one space and two fuels, so we encircle the emergent geometries , topologies and matters and fields, sometimes the complexity return to simplicity, all this is an assumption general but seems logic.

report post as inappropriate