If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Jason Wolfe: on 7/9/20 at 19:53pm UTC, wrote In all honesty, I'm not even sure what intelligent and educated people...
Jason Wolfe: on 7/9/20 at 17:34pm UTC, wrote It would be nice to imagine that the Germans are working on gravity...
Frank Stanhope: on 7/9/20 at 13:57pm UTC, wrote Dear Colleagues, Being a passionate follower of the existing practices of...
Johannes Kleiner: on 7/3/20 at 11:52am UTC, wrote Abstract: Integrated Information Theory (IIT), developed by Giulio Tononi...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Steve Dufourny: "there is something of very relevant for the actions coupled in matters and..." in Is Causality Fundamental?
Steve Dufourny: "I have utilised this general method for the quantum gravitation and oddly I..." in Is Causality Fundamental?
Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, The Earth`s rotational motion is the physical mechanism..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Dufourny: "Hi Mr Snowdon, I beleive indeed that there is a link with the rotations of..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Dufourny: "I repeat this simple general intuitive idea, what are your thoughts? .... ..." in Undecidability,...
Steve Dufourny: "You know Tejinder, I don t want to destroy the works of strings theorists,..." in Undecidability,...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.
Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.
Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.
Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.
Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.
Jason Wolfe: on 7/9/20 at 19:53pm UTC, wrote In all honesty, I'm not even sure what intelligent and educated people...
Jason Wolfe: on 7/9/20 at 17:34pm UTC, wrote It would be nice to imagine that the Germans are working on gravity...
Frank Stanhope: on 7/9/20 at 13:57pm UTC, wrote Dear Colleagues, Being a passionate follower of the existing practices of...
Johannes Kleiner: on 7/3/20 at 11:52am UTC, wrote Abstract: Integrated Information Theory (IIT), developed by Giulio Tononi...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Steve Dufourny: "there is something of very relevant for the actions coupled in matters and..." in Is Causality Fundamental?
Steve Dufourny: "I have utilised this general method for the quantum gravitation and oddly I..." in Is Causality Fundamental?
Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, The Earth`s rotational motion is the physical mechanism..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Dufourny: "Hi Mr Snowdon, I beleive indeed that there is a link with the rotations of..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Dufourny: "I repeat this simple general intuitive idea, what are your thoughts? .... ..." in Undecidability,...
Steve Dufourny: "You know Tejinder, I don t want to destroy the works of strings theorists,..." in Undecidability,...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.
Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.
Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.
Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.
Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.
FQXi BLOGS
August 5, 2020
Abstract: Integrated Information Theory (IIT), developed by Giulio Tononi and collaborators, has emerged as one of the leading scientific theories of consciousness. At the heart of IIT is an algorithm which, based on the level of integration of the internal causal relationships of a physical system in a given state, claims to determine the intensity and quality of its conscious experience. However, IIT is known to possess several technical problems, and is only applicable to simple classical physical systems. To be treated as fundamental, it should ideally be extended to more general physical theories.
In this work, we investigate the formal structure of IIT, and define a notion of generalised integrated information theory in order to address these problems. Formally such a theory specifies a mapping from a given theory of physics to one of conscious experience, each satisfying minimal conditions needed for the IIT algorithm.
In particular we show how a generalisation of IIT may be constructed from any suitable physical process theory, as described mathematically by a symmetric monoidal category. Specialising to classical processes yields IIT as usually defined, while restricting to quantum processes yields the recently proposed Quantum IIT of Zanardi et al. as a special case.
Keywords: #Models of consciousness
report post as inappropriate
This forum thread is open to the public.
In this work, we investigate the formal structure of IIT, and define a notion of generalised integrated information theory in order to address these problems. Formally such a theory specifies a mapping from a given theory of physics to one of conscious experience, each satisfying minimal conditions needed for the IIT algorithm.
In particular we show how a generalisation of IIT may be constructed from any suitable physical process theory, as described mathematically by a symmetric monoidal category. Specialising to classical processes yields IIT as usually defined, while restricting to quantum processes yields the recently proposed Quantum IIT of Zanardi et al. as a special case.
Keywords: #Models of consciousness
This forum thread is open to the public.
Dear Colleagues,
Being a passionate follower of the existing practices of the Integrated Information Theory I wanted to present my dearest compliments for all the work you have been doing so far on this area. I find IIT as the most promising and exciting work on the field of consciousness and constantly follow all the published work of Giulio Tononi and his team.
Currently we are building a new scientific discovery center in our property in Germany and would love to have you as a guest in our new laboratory. We would love to work together with you and consultate about our researches.
Best regards
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission
report post as inappropriate
Being a passionate follower of the existing practices of the Integrated Information Theory I wanted to present my dearest compliments for all the work you have been doing so far on this area. I find IIT as the most promising and exciting work on the field of consciousness and constantly follow all the published work of Giulio Tononi and his team.
Currently we are building a new scientific discovery center in our property in Germany and would love to have you as a guest in our new laboratory. We would love to work together with you and consultate about our researches.
Best regards
report post as inappropriate
It would be nice to imagine that the Germans are working on gravity propulsion technology in some secret laboratory. In some secret unerground facility, you are entangling photons, blueshifting/redshifting them in a way that causes the quantum states of entanglements to align linearly, in a non random pattern.
report post as inappropriate
In all honesty, I'm not even sure what intelligent and educated people think about consciousness anymore. There are those who have abandoned the best explanation we had, that a Creator-God set the stage, the big bang, created life. As near as I can tell, the smartest people we have who continue this way, stare into the chaos and entropy of mathematics, and continue to see nothing that explains the world we live in. If the smartest people we know can't give us answers without help from the divine, then maybe the atheists were wrong.
report post as inappropriate
Login or create account to post reply or comment.