Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Lorraine Ford: on 10/1/20 at 21:48pm UTC, wrote Tim Palmer, “Causal heft” is a term used by philosopher David...

Lorraine Ford: on 9/29/20 at 22:36pm UTC, wrote Tim Palmer, 1. The micro-world somehow knows about (what we human beings...

Steve Dufourny: on 9/29/20 at 7:58am UTC, wrote Hi Mr Baugh , welcome on this wonderful platform, I agree with you about...

Tim Palmer: on 7/3/20 at 11:38am UTC, wrote Abstract: This talk is in two parts. In the first part, I suggest that...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Dr Narayan Bhadra : "For the explanation of Gravitational forces we need to go beyond the..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Dr Narayan Bhadra : "STRUCTURE FORMATION OF BIO-ELEMENTS Dr. Narayan Kumar Bhadra Lakshmipur..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Ulla Mattfolk: "In a statement posted on its website on 27 June, SNRIU said that "due to..." in Global Collaboration

Ulla Mattfolk: "Cont. Of the nuclear countries Sweden and Germany has said no thanks, they..." in Global Collaboration

Steve Dufourny: "Jonathan Dickau ,hope you are well, always cool to have your points of vue,..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

Steve Dufourny: "This platform is about theoretical physics, it is irritating to have these..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

Steve Dufourny: "I recommand this you tube of Professor Ellis about mind, intelligence,..." in George Ellis - How can...

Steve Dufourny: "irritating these posts, they shall disappear simply because under review..." in George Ellis - How can...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Math of Consciousness: Q&A with Kobi Kremnitzer
A meditating mathematician is developing a theory of conscious experience to help understand the boundary between the quantum and classical world.

Can We Feel What It’s Like to Be Quantum?
Underground experiments in the heart of the Italian mountains are testing the links between consciousness and collapse theories of quantum physics.

The Thermodynamic Limits of Intelligence: Q&A with David Wolpert
Calculating the energy needed to acquire and compute information could help explain the (in)efficiency of human brains and guide the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence.

Gambling Against the Second Law
Using precision thermometry to make mini heat engines, that might, momentarily, bust through the thermodynamic limit.

Mind and Machine: What Does It Mean to Be Sentient?
Using neural networks to test definitions of 'autonomy.'


FQXi BLOGS
June 30, 2022

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Creativity & Consciousness by Tim Palmer [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger Tim Palmer wrote on Jul. 3, 2020 @ 11:38 GMT
Abstract: This talk is in two parts. In the first part, I suggest that creativity arises from a close synergy between two modes of neuronal operation (corresponding to Kahnemann’s Systems 1 and 2) where in the first, the limited amount of available energy to the brain is spread across large numbers of active neuronal networks, making them susceptible to noise; and in the second, available energy is focussed on smaller subset of active networks, making them operate more deterministically. In the second part, I define consciousness in terms of an ability to perceive an object as independent of its surroundings.



This implies an ability to perceive counterfactual worlds where objects are perturbed relative to their surroundings. I argue that such perception may require quantum theoretic processes to be operating in the brain, since the very formulation of quantum theory (whether in convention or unconventional interpretations) involves the primacy of states of alternate worlds - alive and dead cats and so on. I argue that the brain’s reliance on such quantum processes may have arisen because they are more energy efficient than corresponding classical processes, and give some examples to justify this. Overall, I argue that human creativity and consciousness may have arisen from the brain’s evolution to become an organ of exceptional energy efficiency.



Keywords: #Models of consciousness

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

This forum thread is open to the public.


Lorraine Ford wrote on Sep. 29, 2020 @ 22:36 GMT
Tim Palmer,

1. The micro-world somehow knows about (what we human beings symbolically represent as) laws of nature, variables, and associated numbers for the variables: THAT is the only possible content of proto-consciousness; THAT is the only possible basis for building the content of higher consciousness.

Our consciousness of the blonde woman wearing an aqua-coloured top crossing the road at a zebra crossing, with red, white and yellow cars, and green trees and grass in the background is not made-up stuff or random nonsense. The content of our consciousness, e.g. the woman in the aqua-coloured top, is necessarily built out of information coming from particle interactions in the eyes and information coming from other sense organs.

The basis for higher-level factual information is lower-level factual information; i.e. the basis for higher-level consciousness OF information is lower-level proto-consciousness OF information. There are no miracles: consciousness OF information can’t miraculously emerge from no consciousness of information.

2. For physicists, “creativity” is identical to the normal operation of the laws of nature, with a bit of randomness thrown in. HONEST physicists should NOT misuse the word “creativity”: they should use the words “mindless randomness”: they should call a spade a spade, and not try to make out it is more than a spade.

The genuine meaning of the word “creativity” is “bring (something) into existence”: if a person creates something, they literally bring it into existence. The physics of someone bringing something into existence is clearly different to the physics of mindless randomness.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Lorraine Ford wrote on Oct. 1, 2020 @ 21:48 GMT
Tim Palmer,

“Causal heft” is a term used by philosopher David Chalmers. According to physics, only two elements of the universe have causal heft: laws of nature and mindless randomness; matter does not have causal heft. I.e. according to physics, people and other living things can’t have genuine causal heft i.e. they can’t have genuine free will or creativity, they can only have the superficial appearance of free will and creativity.

In this era of lies, spin and the massaging of facts, shouldn’t physicists be honest about their beliefs? Physicists should honestly say that they believe that free will and creativity don’t exist, and that what actually exists is the superficial appearance of free will and creativity. If free will and creativity did in fact genuinely exist, then physics would be wrong about the nature of matter.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.