If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Cristi Stoica: on 12/15/08 at 8:48am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Vongehr, I loved the way you presented, in a lucid and profound...
Sascha Vongehr: on 12/1/08 at 11:03am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract Most once mysterious questions concerning the...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: ""The motion of the solar system, and the orientation of the plane of the..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...
Jim Snowdon: "On the permanently dark side of the Earth, the stars would appear to stay..." in The Nature of Time
Georgina Woodward: "Hi Jorma, some thoughts; You mention mutual EM connection. I think you..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
akash hasan: "Some students have an interest in researching and space exploration. I..." in Announcing Physics of the...
Michael Jordan: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Anonymous: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Constructing a Theory of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
Cristi Stoica: on 12/15/08 at 8:48am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Vongehr, I loved the way you presented, in a lucid and profound...
Sascha Vongehr: on 12/1/08 at 11:03am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract Most once mysterious questions concerning the...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: ""The motion of the solar system, and the orientation of the plane of the..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...
Jim Snowdon: "On the permanently dark side of the Earth, the stars would appear to stay..." in The Nature of Time
Georgina Woodward: "Hi Jorma, some thoughts; You mention mutual EM connection. I think you..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
akash hasan: "Some students have an interest in researching and space exploration. I..." in Announcing Physics of the...
Michael Jordan: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Anonymous: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Constructing a Theory of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
FQXi FORUM
May 26, 2019
CATEGORY:
The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008)
[back]
TOPIC: Relational Resolution of Time needs Many Worlds Interpretation with Small Probability Cutoff by Sascha Vongehr [refresh]
TOPIC: Relational Resolution of Time needs Many Worlds Interpretation with Small Probability Cutoff by Sascha Vongehr [refresh]
Essay Abstract
Most once mysterious questions concerning the concept of time have been resolved satisfactorily. While reviewing the progress, many well known issues are presented in refreshingly new ways: Zeno’s arrow paradox, time in relativity theory, etc. The still unresolved issue is a fully relational resolution from which time is emergent. The concept of time is closely linked with Many World Interpretations (MWI). Reviewing problems of quantum mechanics (QM), unitarity is stressed to be the most severe, because it gives rise to religious interpretations. Extremely low probability of after-live is not enough suppression, because the “dead fraction” does not count towards the statistical ensemble in a many minds MWI. The proper decoherence mechanism will cut off extremely low probabilities, resulting in zeros (impossibility). A simple physical system, e.g. decaying nuclei, shows that these problems are closely related with the issue of synchronization and emergence of time. In the same spirit as describing a quantum computation as put together from computations performed in parallel universes, similarly time is arising from the interference of MWI branches. While trying to let time emerge in the multiverse structure, the extremely low probability cutoff directs from the outset only towards extremely small corrections to QM that do not conflict with current observations.
Author Bio
Sascha Vongehr is employed as theoretical and experimental physicist at the Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Nanjing. He started to study philosophy in Germany, obtained his M. Sc. in string theory at the University of Sussex, and his Ph. D. from the University of Southern California, 2005. Current areas are cosmology and nanotechnology. He worked on two-time theory, helium clusters and neuroscience of the visual system (postdoc).
Download Essay PDF File
Most once mysterious questions concerning the concept of time have been resolved satisfactorily. While reviewing the progress, many well known issues are presented in refreshingly new ways: Zeno’s arrow paradox, time in relativity theory, etc. The still unresolved issue is a fully relational resolution from which time is emergent. The concept of time is closely linked with Many World Interpretations (MWI). Reviewing problems of quantum mechanics (QM), unitarity is stressed to be the most severe, because it gives rise to religious interpretations. Extremely low probability of after-live is not enough suppression, because the “dead fraction” does not count towards the statistical ensemble in a many minds MWI. The proper decoherence mechanism will cut off extremely low probabilities, resulting in zeros (impossibility). A simple physical system, e.g. decaying nuclei, shows that these problems are closely related with the issue of synchronization and emergence of time. In the same spirit as describing a quantum computation as put together from computations performed in parallel universes, similarly time is arising from the interference of MWI branches. While trying to let time emerge in the multiverse structure, the extremely low probability cutoff directs from the outset only towards extremely small corrections to QM that do not conflict with current observations.
Author Bio
Sascha Vongehr is employed as theoretical and experimental physicist at the Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Nanjing. He started to study philosophy in Germany, obtained his M. Sc. in string theory at the University of Sussex, and his Ph. D. from the University of Southern California, 2005. Current areas are cosmology and nanotechnology. He worked on two-time theory, helium clusters and neuroscience of the visual system (postdoc).
Download Essay PDF File
Dear Dr. Vongehr,
I loved the way you presented, in a lucid and profound manner, the problems related to the time, block time, and the many worlds interpretation. Interesting the small probability cutoff mechanism via decoherence.
Best wishes,
Cristi Stoica
Flowing with a Frozen River
I loved the way you presented, in a lucid and profound manner, the problems related to the time, block time, and the many worlds interpretation. Interesting the small probability cutoff mechanism via decoherence.
Best wishes,
Cristi Stoica
Flowing with a Frozen River
Login or create account to post reply or comment.