If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

**Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest**

*December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020*

Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

read/discuss • winners

**What Is “Fundamental”**

*October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018*

*Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation*

read/discuss • winners

**Wandering Towards a Goal**

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

*December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017*

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

**Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics**

*Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation*

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

**How Should Humanity Steer the Future?**

*January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014*

*Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**It From Bit or Bit From It**

*March 25 - June 28, 2013*

*Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Questioning the Foundations**

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

*May 24 - August 31, 2012*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Is Reality Digital or Analog?**

*November 2010 - February 2011*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?**

*May - October 2009*

*Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams*

read/discuss • winners

**The Nature of Time**

*August - December 2008*

read/discuss • winners

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Forum Home

Introduction

Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

Introduction

Terms of Use

*Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.*

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

**Pavel Poluian**: *on* 5/18/20 at 19:03pm UTC, wrote I really enjoyed your essay. I am glad that you are critical of the...

**Vladimir Fedorov**: *on* 5/17/20 at 4:26am UTC, wrote Dear Michael I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very...

**Michael Dalton**: *on* 4/22/20 at 3:21am UTC, wrote Following your comment on my paper, I have given some thought linkages...

**Michael Dalton**: *on* 4/22/20 at 3:19am UTC, wrote I have not previously considered any relationship between blue shifted...

**Satyavarapu Gupta**: *on* 4/19/20 at 9:43am UTC, wrote Dear Dalton, You mean you can use Newtons law to derive the origins of...

**Michael Dalton**: *on* 4/18/20 at 12:50pm UTC, wrote Dr Brown, Thank you for pointing out the absence of any mention of MOND. ...

**Michael Dalton**: *on* 4/18/20 at 12:49pm UTC, wrote Mr Gupta, Thank you for your interest in my paper. I have read through...

**David Brown**: *on* 4/18/20 at 9:54am UTC, wrote In Susskind's article "Entanglement Is Not Enough", arXiv, 2014, there is...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

**Lorraine Ford**: "So what exactly is WRONG with physics, apart from the fact that physics..."
*in* The Present State of...

**Georgina Woodward**: "The perception generated of time difference relates to the potential..."
*in* Anatomy of spacetime and...

**Steve Dufourny**: "Hello Jim, yes indeed in a sense we have these motions and we have invented..."
*in* The Quantum Clock-Maker...

**Jim Snowdon**: "Hi Steve, Clearly we have motion in our Universe. It is not..."
*in* The Quantum Clock-Maker...

**Steve Dufourny**: "You are welcome, thanks too for your words. I have never lost the faith..."
*in* The Present State of...

**Georgina Woodward**: "For completeness: Concerning The curved spacetime of GR. Alteration of the..."
*in* Anatomy of spacetime and...

**Georgina Woodward**: "Thank you. Good luck."
*in* The Nature of Time

**Lorraine Ford**: "Rob, As you have not replied, I take it that you now concede that the..."
*in* 16th Marcel Grossmann...

RECENT ARTICLES

*click titles to read articles*

**The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI**

Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

**Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel**

'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

**Can Choices Curve Spacetime?**

Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

**The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools **

Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

**The Quantum Refrigerator**

A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

RECENT FORUM POSTS

RECENT ARTICLES

Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

FQXi FORUM

September 16, 2021

CATEGORY:
Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020)
[back]

TOPIC: Predicting Velocities of Stars by Michael Dalton [refresh]

TOPIC: Predicting Velocities of Stars by Michael Dalton [refresh]

Mathematical descriptions of our universe are influenced by the presumed existence of dark matter which was introduced to explain a failure of Newton’s law of gravity to predict the velocities of stars. This essay postulates a new equation for gravity derived from research undertaken by Professor Leonard Susskind and Professor Seth Lloyd. If this equation can more accurately predict the velocities of stars, the underlying theory supports the idea that our universe originates in an Anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. In an AdS space, there may not be unresolvable Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability issues. Our universe could have been designed to generate solutions to these issues. This essay is a first step in challenging the notion that ‘there are rigorous arguments limiting what we can prove, compute and predict’. The essay describes how a new equation for gravity was derived and how it could be tested. This equation includes variables for the ages and temperatures of a star and galaxy as well as the history of their interaction. When these variables are ignored, the equation reduces to Newton’s Law.

Michael Dalton is now Retired. He was awarded a PhD from Stanford University in Agricultural Economics.

Respected Dr. Michael Dalton

it is very nice that you are using Newtonion gravitation. My 'Dynamic Universe Model' also uses the same. This model considers the simultanious gravitational attraction of all the bodies in the universe as an N- body problem solution. See its "No Dark matter" paper with the link..

"http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/2015/09/journal

-of-astrophysics-aerospace.html "

Part of abstract of the above paper....

Abstract

This paper discusses about the theoretical “non-requirement” of dark matter, or in other words, there is no missing mass in galaxies. A singularity free and collision free n-body problem solution called dynamic universe model was used to find out the theoretical star circular velocity curves in a galaxy. Here five cases are presented. In the first case a HUGE mass at the center of galaxy, sun like stars and external galaxies are assumed, when plotted, the graph of last iteration shows disk formation and velocities achieved. This circular velocities verses radius graph looks exactly similar to observations by astronomers. In all the other cases, either the central mass is missing or external galaxies are missing or both are missing where resulting graphs look different. It can be inferred that the theoretical requirement of dark matter is calculation error, that no dark matter (missing mass) is required according to dynamic universe model. This prediction was first presented in Tokyo University in 2005. Later the findings from LUX in 2013 the (Large Underground Xenon) experiment confirmed this prediction. ...............

Kindly have a look at my essay Please........

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3416

" A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy "

Best wishes to your paper....

=snp

report post as inappropriate

it is very nice that you are using Newtonion gravitation. My 'Dynamic Universe Model' also uses the same. This model considers the simultanious gravitational attraction of all the bodies in the universe as an N- body problem solution. See its "No Dark matter" paper with the link..

"http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/2015/09/journal

-of-astrophysics-aerospace.html "

Part of abstract of the above paper....

Abstract

This paper discusses about the theoretical “non-requirement” of dark matter, or in other words, there is no missing mass in galaxies. A singularity free and collision free n-body problem solution called dynamic universe model was used to find out the theoretical star circular velocity curves in a galaxy. Here five cases are presented. In the first case a HUGE mass at the center of galaxy, sun like stars and external galaxies are assumed, when plotted, the graph of last iteration shows disk formation and velocities achieved. This circular velocities verses radius graph looks exactly similar to observations by astronomers. In all the other cases, either the central mass is missing or external galaxies are missing or both are missing where resulting graphs look different. It can be inferred that the theoretical requirement of dark matter is calculation error, that no dark matter (missing mass) is required according to dynamic universe model. This prediction was first presented in Tokyo University in 2005. Later the findings from LUX in 2013 the (Large Underground Xenon) experiment confirmed this prediction. ...............

Kindly have a look at my essay Please........

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3416

" A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy "

Best wishes to your paper....

=snp

report post as inappropriate

Mr Gupta,

Thank you for your interest in my paper. I have read through your paper and made some comments on it in your thread.

With regard to my paper, space did not allow me to draw out the implications of the methodology for deriving Newton’s Law of Gravity from a set of theoretical ideas. Empirical validation would provide support for a new metaphysical explanation of the origin of our universe. In that context your ideas on philosophical theory need further study.

Thank you for your interest in my paper. I have read through your paper and made some comments on it in your thread.

With regard to my paper, space did not allow me to draw out the implications of the methodology for deriving Newton’s Law of Gravity from a set of theoretical ideas. Empirical validation would provide support for a new metaphysical explanation of the origin of our universe. In that context your ideas on philosophical theory need further study.

Dear Dalton,

You mean you can use Newtons law to derive the origins of Universe, What about Blue shifted Galaxies....???

Best

=snp

report post as inappropriate

You mean you can use Newtons law to derive the origins of Universe, What about Blue shifted Galaxies....???

Best

=snp

report post as inappropriate

I have not previously considered any relationship between blue shifted galaxies and the equations in my paper. The following are some speculative thoughts.

Equation 2.4 suggests the expansion in the fabric of the universe is a function of the temperature of the universe and time. The expansion of our universe reflects the growth in quantum computational complexity over time. The...

view entire post

Equation 2.4 suggests the expansion in the fabric of the universe is a function of the temperature of the universe and time. The expansion of our universe reflects the growth in quantum computational complexity over time. The...

view entire post

In Susskind's article "Entanglement Is Not Enough", arXiv, 2014, there is no mention of Milgrom or MOND. I say that Milgrom is the Kepler of contemporary cosmology — on the basis of overwhelming empirical evidence. Have you carefully studied the empirical evidence related to the predictions of Milgrom's MOND?

Mordehai (Moti) Milgrom, Weizmann Institute of Science

report post as inappropriate

Mordehai (Moti) Milgrom, Weizmann Institute of Science

report post as inappropriate

Dr Brown,

Thank you for pointing out the absence of any mention of MOND. Your comment gives me a better appreciate of the different perspectives people may bring to my paper.

First, I want to acknowledge Professor Milgrom’s contribution to improving understanding of the velocity rotation curve.

Contrary to the impression given by the title of my paper, the objective of the paper is to highlight what I regard as a possible advancement of the research carried out by Professors Susskind and Lloyd. Their research includes investigating quantum computational complexity. Professor Susskind’s research, in particular, investigates phenomena in Anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. It can be very difficult to develop empirically testable hypotheses arising from this kind of research.

My paper is concerned with developing an empirically testable hypothesis. The example used in my paper involves an equation for predicting the velocity rotation curve of stars. My claim is that this example may be a way of empirically testing Susskind and Lloyd’s ideas. This equation derives Newton’s Law of Gravity from a set of theoretical ideas rather than being deduced from empirical observations. I point out in my paper that the equation may need to be modified as a result of empirical testing. I am happy to acknowledge that MOND may provide useful ideas for modifying the equation. There are, however, many kinds of modifications and the essay guidelines only allow for contributions of 25,000 characters. Space did not allow me to mention the merits of the various possibilities.

Thank you for pointing out the absence of any mention of MOND. Your comment gives me a better appreciate of the different perspectives people may bring to my paper.

First, I want to acknowledge Professor Milgrom’s contribution to improving understanding of the velocity rotation curve.

Contrary to the impression given by the title of my paper, the objective of the paper is to highlight what I regard as a possible advancement of the research carried out by Professors Susskind and Lloyd. Their research includes investigating quantum computational complexity. Professor Susskind’s research, in particular, investigates phenomena in Anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. It can be very difficult to develop empirically testable hypotheses arising from this kind of research.

My paper is concerned with developing an empirically testable hypothesis. The example used in my paper involves an equation for predicting the velocity rotation curve of stars. My claim is that this example may be a way of empirically testing Susskind and Lloyd’s ideas. This equation derives Newton’s Law of Gravity from a set of theoretical ideas rather than being deduced from empirical observations. I point out in my paper that the equation may need to be modified as a result of empirical testing. I am happy to acknowledge that MOND may provide useful ideas for modifying the equation. There are, however, many kinds of modifications and the essay guidelines only allow for contributions of 25,000 characters. Space did not allow me to mention the merits of the various possibilities.

Following your comment on my paper, I have given some thought linkages between the ideas in my paper and MOND. As I understand from a recent paper by Professor Milgrom “The a0 - cosmology connection in MOND” https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.09729.pdf, Milgrom has been thinking about the ‘FUNDAMOND’ – the more basic theory underlying MOND phenomenology. He has identified a numerical relation...

view entire post

view entire post

Dear Michael

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: “Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus”, due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 “Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability”.

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: “Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus”, due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 “Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability”.

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

I really enjoyed your essay. I am glad that you are critical of the fantastic hypothesis of non-baryonic Dark Matter. I wrote about this in my book "The Death of Dark Matter: Philosophical Principles in Physical Cognition." I write there that non-baryonic dark matter is the "idol of the scientific subconscious". (You can download the file at Internet.) Since I found a similarity between our approaches, I decided to give you a rating positively. I hope that you will also read my essay and evaluate it positively.

New ontology: algorithmic laws and the flow of time by Pavel Vadimovich Poluian

I wish you the realization of your bold ideas and projects.

Yours sincerely -

Paul Poluian,

Siberian Federal University

report post as inappropriate

New ontology: algorithmic laws and the flow of time by Pavel Vadimovich Poluian

I wish you the realization of your bold ideas and projects.

Yours sincerely -

Paul Poluian,

Siberian Federal University

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.