Thank you John for your comments. To address your question and to provide an overview of your essay, I had two papers on my short list for the competition, both quite different in that one presented what the case for Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability is, how that exists in physics and cosmology, and the other as the solution to the problem of Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability; two possible essays, one half-empty, the other half-full so to speak. I went with the half-empty, the one posted, as I thought it more important to address the actual issue of the Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability of physics and cosmology than to simply replace it. To address your comments therefore, if I may add the link to how I would judge what is the "solution" to the Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability issue, as most of the papers presented in this competition address what is considered as a solution to the Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability while not focusing on the actual core problem itself of Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability in physics and cosmology, and what that means. The link is as follows:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340574420_Scientific_Principles_of_Space_Time_and_Perception
This alternative paper is shorter than the one posted here, yet it addresses how I would comment on your paper, and other papers that present a pan-theory approach, as it presents the required core logic to a pan-theory of "any" type.