Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Joao Leao: on 3/11/09 at 20:11pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Mikovic’ I read with interest your essay since it deals with...

matthew kolasinski: on 12/24/08 at 8:41am UTC, wrote Hello Prof. Mikovic, while i'm particularly sympathetic to the general...

Aleksandar Mikovic: on 12/19/08 at 16:42pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr Stansfield, Thank you for your comments, since they shed light on...

Jim Stanfield: on 12/15/08 at 23:51pm UTC, wrote Professor Mikovic, I was heartened to read your essay ‘Temporal Platonic...

Cristi Stoica: on 12/15/08 at 9:20am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Mikovic, I enjoyed your essay, especially because you proposed an...

F. Le Rouge: on 12/6/08 at 9:45am UTC, wrote Empiricism that drives today Science is still derivating from Plato....

Aleksandar Mikovic: on 12/1/08 at 10:54am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract In this essay we describe a platonic metaphysics...


Steve Dufourny: "In your theory wich is an assumption .....and in my theory wich is also an..." in Towards the unification...

Jonathan Dickau: "In my theory... Early universe evolution happens under the octonions and..." in Towards the unification...

John Cox: ""where work is the coherent component of energy radiated by the qubit." ..." in The energetic cost of...

Lorraine Ford: "When are physicists going to stop lying? They CLAIM they believe in..." in Understanding...

click titles to read articles

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.

January 27, 2021

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Temporal Platonic Metaphysics by Aleksandar Mikovic [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Aleksandar Mikovic wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 10:54 GMT
Essay Abstract

In this essay we describe a platonic metaphysics where time is a fundamental idea such that the passage of time is independent of observers and the laws of physics. Furthermore, time serves to distinguish between a real and an abstract universe, where a real universe is an appropriatelly ordered set of ideas in time, while an abstract universe is such a set outside of time. We allow for non-computable and non-mathematical ideas to be part of our model of the universe in order to include intelligent observers. The part of the universe which can be described by mathematics corresponds to a mathematical structure in Tegmark's sense, while the non-mathematical part can be described by a human language. We describe the mind-brain connection in our framework, and show that it resolves the problem of obtaining abstract knowledge in platonism. We briefly discuss how different interpretations of Quantum Mechanics can be implemented in our framework and point out some physics implications, most notably that the time travel would be impossible.

Author Bio

Aleksandar Mikovic is a professor of mathematics at Lusofona University in Lisbon and a member of the Mathematical Physics Group of the Lisbon University. He obtained his PhD in theoretical physics from the University of Maryland in 1990. From 1990 till 1994 was a postdoc in string theory and quantum gravity at SUNY-Stony Brook, Queen Mary College, and Imperial College in London. He was a researcher at the Institute of Physics in Belgrade from 1995 till 1999. Since 1999 lives and works in Portugal. He has written over 50 papers on string theory, quantum gravity and spin foam models.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

F. Le Rouge wrote on Dec. 6, 2008 @ 09:45 GMT
Empiricism that drives today Science is still derivating from Plato. Einstein for example is not describing or explaining the Universe, he is stating it.

Algebraic Geometry is Empiricism and Empiricism is poetry.

Bookmark and Share

Cristi Stoica wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 09:20 GMT
Dear Dr. Mikovic,

I enjoyed your essay, especially because you proposed an original platonic vision. Interesting the idea of time Universe, the representation of the increase of knowledge of the observers, and your resolution of the epistemological problem in Platonism.

Best regards,

Cristi Stoica

Flowing with a Frozen River

Bookmark and Share

Jim Stanfield wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 23:51 GMT
Professor Mikovic,

I was heartened to read your essay ‘Temporal Platonic Metaphysics’ as you were one of the few to delve into the Platonic realm. As I am a Platonist at heart, I would like to repeat back the gist of your ideas in my own words to see if I have understood them, then add a few observations of my own that would not have occurred to me had it not been for your essay. ...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share

Aleksandar Mikovic wrote on Dec. 19, 2008 @ 16:42 GMT
Dear Dr Stansfield,

Thank you for your comments, since they shed light on my proposal from a different angle. Let me try to answer your questions:

The objects of the Platonic Realm, I call ideas. Hence I use the name World of Ideas for PR. The PR can be split into mathematical part (PRM) and everything else (non-mathematical ideas). The mathematical ideas can be thought of as graphs, i.e. relations among some elementary objects, like natural numbers. How to specify non-mathematical ideas is an interesting problem, but the simplest approach is to use a human language to describe their relations to other ideas.

In the case of time, or the idea of passage of time T,

given a sequence of ideas H, which I call a history, then

U(H,T) would be a universe which we would perceive as the one where the instant of now is moving along the levels of H. An analogy which I like is that H is a DVD and U(H,T) is a movie played by a DVD player T.

As far as the consciousness is concerned, it is a temporal sequence C of ideas contained in U(H,T), which are attached to a particular brain. C contains both mathematical and non-mathematical ideas. Therefore I beleive that C is not a subset of PRM, since we can imagine T, and T is a non-mathematical idea. On the other hand I beleive that the brain is a part of PRM. In other words, mind contains mathematical and non-mathematical ideas, while the matter is mathematical.

Bookmark and Share

matthew kolasinski wrote on Dec. 24, 2008 @ 08:41 GMT
Hello Prof. Mikovic,

while i'm particularly sympathetic to the general premise here, because i am sympathetic to the cause, there are a couple of aspects here i think i'd like to see taken a little more deeply in their consideration.


The ideas stored in our brain can be of two types: the ideas which are records of our interactions with the environment and the ideas which...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share

Joao Leao wrote on Mar. 11, 2009 @ 20:11 GMT
Dear Dr. Mikovic’

I read with interest your essay since it deals with questions that I have worked on and have been interested for some time. I would like to offer you a number of observations which, though, avowedly critical, remain sympathetic and may help you sharpen up your interesting and estimable undertaking.

Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis is not so much a...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.