Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/5/20 at 18:44pm UTC, wrote Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, I really like your model of the...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/30/20 at 1:28am UTC, wrote Dear Paul Schroeder , There are blue shifted galaxies and red shifted...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/30/20 at 1:06am UTC, wrote Dear Paul Schroeder , I was just reading your essay, I got some comments....

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/30/20 at 0:15am UTC, wrote Dear Paul Schroeder , Thank you for remembering me, thank you for your...

Paul Schroeder: on 3/29/20 at 19:45pm UTC, wrote Gupta, I am pleased to see your continuation toward a paradigm shift. As...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/26/20 at 12:19pm UTC, wrote Respected Prof Avtar Singh Sir, Thank you for your post in my Essay. I was...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/26/20 at 11:44am UTC, wrote Respected Prof Butler This is in continuation to my above post ...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/26/20 at 11:25am UTC, wrote Respected Professor Paul N Butler ………….. Your...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "Information about carrots, peppers, tweeting birds and roaring lions does..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Lorraine Ford: "Carl, Instead of focusing on examples like carrots and peppers, we need to..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Lorraine Ford: "To many, consciousness doesn’t make sense: why isn’t the world a zombie..." in Consciousness in the...

Lorraine Ford: "The thing about consciousness, as opposed to laws of nature, is that..." in Consciousness in the...

Janko Kokosar: "I propose a simple addition for more honest voting. These steps can help..." in Undecidability,...

Satyavarapu Gupta: "What should be the Foundational basis of an Alternative cosmological theory..." in Alternative Models of...

Catalina Curceanu: "I would like to inform you that next week, starting 30th March, we shall..." in INSPYRE 2020 -- Please...

Jochen Szangolies: "Hi there, I'm not sure it's such a good idea to make current votes visible..." in Undecidability,...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.

Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.

The Quantum Agent
Investigating how the quantum measurement process might be related to the emergence of intelligence, agency and free will.

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.


FQXi FORUM
April 5, 2020

CATEGORY: Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020) [back]
TOPIC: A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy by Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

This essay's rating: Community = 5.4; Public = 7.6


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 1, 2020 @ 14:37 GMT
Essay Abstract

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability are very much undesirable properties and out-comes of any theory. That theory might have developed by a very reputed person or by a group of well-educated and knowledgeable persons. There is no point of poring resources, money and highly educated man power into that theory. That theory might have given some good results earlier, but if it is having a complex mathematical base and if the possible outcomes of these equations are mis-leading to these above 3Uns, people should discard and switch to another new theory which is giving experimentally verifiable results.

Author Bio

I am just nobody. All this work was guided by Maa Vak. A single frame work called “Dynamic Universe model” an N-Body problem solution, solves many Physical problems. This model is computationally simple and iterative, Mathematically / Logically deciding and predicted many physical results like ‘Blue shifted Galaxies’, ‘No Dark matter’, ‘Frequency upshifting’ / ‘radiation to matter conversion’, which all came true after 7 or 8 years after prediction. The foundational philosophy behind this model is presented here. For free downloading of published Scientific papers and books see http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT
The essay by Mr.S N P Gupta is a bold attempt against the main stream physics,but simple enough to explain experimental facts with out the need for complicated theories based on relativity and quantum physics which led to the existence of Dark matter,Dark energy, singularities and Big bang.

He proved that his theory could explain Blue shifted galaxies, Pioneer anomaly, CMB etc with out the present theories in vogue.Foundation of his theory is well established Newtonian gravity which requires no need to use General Relativity.I am sure in near future, he will get his well deserved attention from numerous scientists working in the field of cosmology.His painstaking effort in developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology is laudable.I wish he will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field.

Dr JVS Murty

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 14:27 GMT
Respected Prof JVS. Murty

Thank you for your First Post with lots of Blessings.

I did not attempt to anything unguided in the subject matter of the Essay Contest, I just followed guidelines given by FQXi Contest “Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability”.

I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the “ real open thinking” is supported. Nothing else. I am not against Bigbang based cosmologists. They have their own scientific agenda and formulation and of-course, a gigantic financial support. Well and good.

I am also hoping to get some support for ‘Dynamic Universe Model’, in some near future.

Thank you once again Sir

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:13 GMT
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 5, 2020 @ 10:27 GMT

Dear Satyavarapu,

Thank you for your remarks.

First, have no fear because I am not a prof, nor am I connected to an Institution, so no Walls.

The mathematics I got at the University of Delft are mostly forgotten, so I try to think free and simple.

(A6) Yes indeed I use the expression singularity, the reason is that Total Simultaneity is out of reach for us, and I have no other means of expression.

B 1/4: I fully agree.

B5 may become verifiable when we create a quantum computer and the result is that we created Artificial Consciousness(not AI).so until now it is not verifiable but in the future, it will be.

B 6/9 fully agreed upon.

C1: In my opinion, there are too many NO's for an emergent reality, if you accept all that NO's you are describing my Total Simultaneity.

C 2: I am a great fan of FREE THINKING.

C 3: Now you come back after accepting all the no's, you are entering a model with all the rules and dimensions that belong in an emergent phenomenon like our reality. OF course, this is your interpretation of this emergent phenomenon and as I also argue: We just don't know. You and I are just adding conscious interpretations. Who am I to say you are wrong?

C 4: Each model is remaining just a model with only partially events that are involved. (The further you go into history the lesser the chance that you exists, see my article https://www.academia.edu/40946114/The_TOTAL_SIMULTANEITY_INT


ERPRETATION I agree with your conclusion No BB.

Your conclusion is about the development of new interpretations of our reality, I think we both are on that way you with your DUM (but only shortly explained in your essay) and I with my Total Simultaneity Interpretation.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:15 GMT
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:09 GMT

Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Thank you for nice comparison of Both essays.

You are correct, concepts are same wordings are different.

I am just posting your post on my essay.

N-body problem solution solves all these problems which is explained by all these 'NO's !!!

Best wishes to Total Simultaneity Interpretation!!!

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share

report post as inappropriate

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 9, 2020 @ 16:04 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Very deep and interesting ideas. You do not support the Big Bang hypothesis, I agree with that. This hypothesis introduces maximum ontological uncertainty into the scientific picture of the world. Do you know this An Open Letter to the Scientific Community?

Respectfully,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 10, 2020 @ 04:09 GMT
Respected Prof Vladimir,

Einstein did not like and support Bigbang based cosmology!!!

I reproduced some of your words of wisdom from "An Open Letter to the Scientific Community?".

…………………..Supporters of the big bang theory may retort that these theories do not explain every cosmological observation. But that is scarcely surprising, as their development has been...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 08:54 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Today, when science, primarily fundamental science, is experiencing a crisis of philosophical foundations, support for research and researchers in at least three alternative areas is needed. And this primarily refers to cosmology. Humanity will not be able to develop steadily when science says that "In the beginning was the Big Bang ..."... I think that children at school studying Astronomy will not understand this and will ask questions that cosmologists cannot answer. Today, we all need patience, hope and great mutual understanding.

I wish you success!

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 04:02 GMT
Respected Prof Vladimir,

Wonderful song on hope!!!! The song rightly tells us that in reality we cosmologists are in fog and cold buzzard of dictator ship. This song is appropriate for our situation!!! All the young children are taught about Bigbang, as though it is right. This aspect pinches me......

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share



Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Mar. 10, 2020 @ 17:42 GMT
Gupta is right BB cosmology is a fairy tale.

attachments: Cosmology_based_on_measured_data_and_observation.pdf

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 04:37 GMT
Respected Prof Sorli,

You wrote an excellant essay on Cosmology, you are correct in saying that measured data is correct than calculated data. When calculated data and if it is a predicted data by a model and if it matches with measured data then that model is also correct.

Blackholes and Bigbang are singularities with infinite densities and are not possible. CMB is nothing but Star and Galaxy radiation. Astronomical Jets are formed with particles that are emitted by sun and stars and they travel in parallel to galaxy plane and bend perpendicularly at galaxy center.

There a Densemass at galaxy center not a blackhole. It is having huge mass finite density to support the Galaxy disk, but not with infinite density.

What do you say ....???

Best

Bookmark and Share



Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 20:07 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

this is a very useful essay and all so true. A new theory is needed to serve Humanity, not the author or his scientific circle that defends boundaries.

Thanks for the essay that is recommend.

Best regards

Manfred U.E.Pohl

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 08:20 GMT
Dear Sir

Mail is not going to your id....

contact@manfred pohl.de

do you have any other ID? I just gave you highest of appreciation to your essay, best wishes

=snp

Bookmark and Share



KOFI KISSI DOMPERE wrote on Mar. 12, 2020 @ 00:59 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

your statement "A theory in pure Mathematics and a theory in Physics have different requirements

and outcomes. Apure Mathematical theory may not have any physical basis and out-comes

also may not have any physical significances." is part to the debate of representation. Mathematics is simply a language that may be used to communicate ideas of different category of knowing. You are correct to point out the differences between pure mathematical theory and the theory of physics in relation of course to decidability, computability and predictability. This representation problem was central to the debate between Russell and Brouwer and between the intuitionist school and formalist school in the use of classical mathematics under classical paradigm of thought. Physical phenomenon must not be forced into obaying mathematical laws. Mathematics must be used to present physical laws and behavior.



KOFI KISSI DOMPERE.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 09:40 GMT
Dear Professor,

See my post on your essay and check your mail also...

Best

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share



Avtar Singh wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 19:26 GMT
Dear Mr. Gupta:

Thanks for your time and comments on my essay.

You have presented good ideas for requirements of an acceptable theory in your essay. I agree with you that Big Bang is not a complete and correct theory. My paper presents an alternative to the Big Bang paralyzed by numerous unresolved paradoxes.

Good luck with your essay.

Best Regards

Avtar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 21:42 GMT
Hi Sab,

Thanks for your comments and for the Good luck wishes.

Please check your essay and mail for further comments

Best

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 19:50 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu,

A pleasure to find you here again and read your highly agreeable essay. Our good agreement from the past is continued, and I appreciate your clear, direct and concise English, in the spirit of the essay itself, and underlying theory.

I find very little to criticise, but a few queries. While I agree common conceptions of dark energy and matter are badly misguided, the fact is there are a whole tranche of effects and findings which need explanation, building up since Faraday's 'action at a distance', Coulomb, Casimir etc, and the well evidenced 'pair production' (which I'm sure you won't suggest is from 'nothing!) I think you'll like my very simple derivation of these simplifying much of physics!

The only other thing I'd say is that it's a shame, given the space you had, not to expand on HOW the simulations refer to 'solve' the list you give. i.e. what derives the 'force behind expansion' which I've derivved with a soecific physical mechnism and shown the evidence (as well as it's entirely CYCLIC and time limited character!) So many will likely dismiss those as empty claims. But I know it's hard to do so. I did so for a key range in my essay and came right up against the length limit.

I'm sure you'll appreciate mine again, going even more fundamental than the DU for new foundations which should help ALL coherent models. I greatly look forward to your comments or questions.

Very best.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 22:42 GMT
Respected Prof Piter Jackson,

Thank you for your Wonderful words of appreciation, and even on my English too...

Your words......

I find very little to criticise, but a few queries. While I agree common conceptions of dark energy and matter are badly misguided, the fact is there are a whole tranche of effects and findings which need explanation, building up since Faraday's 'action at a distance', Coulomb, Casimir etc, and the well evidenced 'pair production' (which I'm sure you won't suggest is from 'nothing!) I think you'll like my very simple derivation of these simplifying much of physics!............

My reply.............

No no, I dont suggest from nothing!!!

You saw my paper on frequency up-shifting and energy to mass conversion in FQXi 2017 contest. That will be the answer...............

Your words.............

The only other thing I'd say is that it's a shame, given the space you had, not to expand on HOW the simulations refer to 'solve' the list you give. i.e. what derives the 'force behind expansion' which I've derivved with a soecific physical mechnism and shown the evidence (as well as it's entirely CYCLIC and time limited character!) So many will likely dismiss those as empty claims. But I know it's hard to do so. I did so for a key range in my essay and came right up against the length limit..................

My reply............

All those are solved papers published earlier, all papers are available in internet as well as in my blog.

You can select any of the topics or all of them one by one.... and we will discuss in any detail that is required.

Your words................

I'm sure you'll appreciate mine again, going even more fundamental than the DU for new foundations which should help ALL coherent models. I greatly look forward to your comments or questions........................

Please check your mail and your essay for my comments.

Best reagrds

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share



Dale Carl Gillman wrote on Mar. 14, 2020 @ 04:56 GMT
Hello S.N.P. Gupta,

I would like to thank you for your kind comments on my essay. I read your essay and thought it was very interesting. I think there are many points which both of us agree on. I wrote a (somewhat) extensive response to you and hope that you see it. Please feel free to email me at anytime.



Best regards,

Dale C. Gillman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 15, 2020 @ 04:08 GMT
Dear Gillman

I could not post your document in my essay, some technical error came. You may please copy paste it from here to there.

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 12:16 GMT
Document sent by mail by Author Dale Carl Gillman

=================================================

Hell
o there, S.N.P. Gupta,

Thank you so very much for your high regard. Your feedback is very kind and your compliments are greatly appreciated. I’m sorry that my replying comments are coming relatively delayed. Perhaps there is a time difference between where you are and...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Avtar Singh wrote on Mar. 16, 2020 @ 19:50 GMT
Dear Mr. Gupta Ji

Again thanks for your comments and congratulations on the excellent essay.

I read your essay, website, and references. It is amazing to see that the conclusions of your Dynamic Universe Model match closely with my Universal Relativity Model in that No Big Bang happened and the fundamental reality involves free mass-energy-mass conversion leading to an eternal universe.

However, I have a few questions and if you could please clarify:

1. Is there fundamental uncertainty in the universe, how do you mathematically explain Heisenberg uncertainty?

2. Do you mathematical explain or predict collapse of the wave function that leads to probabilistic reality?

3. How do you explain Multiverses if any?

4. How do you explain consciousness via your model?

Best Regards

Avtar Singh

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 12:45 GMT
Respected Professor Avatar Singh Sab

Thank you for your post...

For Point 1&2.....

This Dynamic Universe Model explains Cosmology and astrophysics at present. It was developed single handedly over the last 30 to 35 years. It is yet to go into quantum side of the physics to answer your questions. I hope you will help me out in these subjects...............At this age only I can only pray God to provide strength for doing these....

For point 3.....There are no multiverses in Dynamic Universe Model.

For point 4.....The Universal Gravitational Force (UGF) acting on each and every body/mass is consciousness in Dynamic Universe Model. This UGF vector is nothing but sum of all vectorial Gravitational forces acting on a body at the considered instant of time and position in space for that setup of the Universe at that instant. It may please be noted that positions of planets stars and Galaxies etc change Dynamically depending on UGF.

Hope this is ok,

Best

=snp

Bookmark and Share


Avtar Singh replied on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 16:57 GMT
Dear Gupta Ji

Since your essay does not address uncertainty and probability or undecidability, and collapse of the wave function, it is relevant only to cosmology and irrelevant to the main theme of this essay competition.

With regard to cosmology, how does the Dynamic Universe model describes the anti-gravity or expansive force to balance the gravity or attractive force? How does it predict the dark energy and the observed expansion of the universe or the cosmological constant?

What is the amount net total energy of the universe? Big Bang model assumes that the net energy is ZERO.

Further consciousness is anti-gravity not gravity as you describe. Gravity is Unconsciousness.

Best Regards

Avtar Singh

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 03:32 GMT
Dear Professor ji,

The starting sentence of your essay say that you are into cosmology........

This paper describes a potential missing physics that leads not only to the artifact undecidability, uncomputability, and unpredictability but also to the current widely known paradoxes of physics/cosmology such as dark energy, dark matter, multiverse,.............

As dark energy dark matter and multi verse are cosmological problems not quantum physical problems.

I just gave the example as "Dynamic Universe Model" for my essay which discusses the morality of any scientific theory should follow.

I will continue in my next post ....

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share


Avtar Singh replied on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 00:37 GMT
Dear Gupta Ji

You did not answer if the Dynamic Universe Model provides any mathematical model for uncertainty?

My essay focuses on mathematical model of uncertainty and undecidability caused by the collapse of the wave function. The cosmology model is only provided in the references to the essay.

Thanks

Avtar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 03:56 GMT
Respected Professor Avatar Singh Sab...

Your words.........

With regard to cosmology, how does the Dynamic Universe model describes the anti-gravity or expansive force to balance the gravity or attractive force? How does it predict the dark energy and the observed expansion of the universe or the cosmological constant?..................

Thank you for a nice question.

in Dynamic Universe Model Gravitational attraction forces does not require gravitational repulsive forces. Centripetal and centrifugal forces compensate each other. Gravitational attraction forces are compensated by centrifugal forces due to speeds of bodies . All the bodies will be moving continuously due to UGF on that body at that time.

Universal Gravitational Force (UGF) acting on each and every body/mass in Dynamic Universe Model. This UGF vector is nothing but sum of all vectorial Gravitational forces acting on a body at that considered instant of time and position in space for that setup of the Universe at that instant. It may please be noted that positions of planets stars and Galaxies etc change Dynamically depending on UGF

Thus all the bodies in the universe are in Dynamic Equilibrium.

I will give a simple example...

Take bucket with half filled water and rotate it about your self. The water will not fall out. It is the same force....

You may have to read my earlier papers on Dynamic Universe Model, an N-body problem solution.

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share


Avtar Singh replied on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 00:41 GMT
The anti-gravity force comes from mass converting to the expansive energy in space and not from the centrifugal force of rotating bodies. Data shows that space is expanding in between the bodies.

Regards

Avtar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 04:16 GMT
Respected Professor Avatar Singh Sab

Thank you for your post...

Thank you for your excellent question again. Your words.......How does it predict the dark energy and the observed expansion of the universe or the cosmological constant?...............

Dark Matter/ Energy is not there in this model. See my paper again explaining Galaxy rotation curves. If you consider the combined gravitational force (UGF) due to Galaxy center, Nearby stars, Gravitational forces due to nearby Galaxies thje missing mass will not be required.

Expansion/ Contarction: There are 30 to 35 % blue shifted Galaxies in the Universe. There was my book on Blue shifted Galaxies. All these books and papers can be freely downloaded from my blog page on Dynamic Universe model blog. You can Google it.

Best regards

=snp

I will continue...

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 04:27 GMT
Respected Professor Avatar Singh Sab

Thank you for your post...

Your words.....What is the amount net total energy of the universe? Big Bang model assumes that the net energy is ZERO...................

That is an wrong assumption sir. There is energy in the Universe that is not Zero. There is matter in the Universe that is not Zero and that matter can be converted into energy, and it is positive energy, (there is no negative energy of-course!)

So Total or Net energy of the Universe can never be ZERO!!!

Best regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 04:47 GMT
Respected Professor Avatar Singh Sab

Thank you for your post...

Your words.....Further consciousness is anti-gravity not gravity as you describe. Gravity is Unconsciousness..............................

Our consciousness is our driving force and it is our continuous guide for our actions. Similarly for for animals also I think. In the same way "The Universal Gravitational Force (UGF) acting on each and every body/mass is consciousness in Dynamic Universe Model."

This UGF is not a constant force on any particular body but varies with time and that body's position in cosmos

so this positive Gravity can never be Unconsciousness....

This completes your post on " on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 16:57 GMT "

We will continue our discussion sir...

Thank you once again..

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 08:24 GMT
Dear Dale Carl Gillman

Thank you for your long and detailed study of my essay. Thank you for your document as I posted on my essay on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 12:16 GMT ...

Thank you for your points A) and B) there... and your words on point C)....

C) Perhaps I am misunderstanding A.2. “…It is a common thing that there is some fear about teachers, professors and superior bosses…”..............

There is nothing to misunderstand, I was just mentioning my experience with fellow students, and the do have some sort of fear about the teachers in addition to their respect with them.

I will continue replying......

What do you say???

Best Regards

=snp

B

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 08:35 GMT
Dear Dale Carl Gillman

Thank you for your document as I posted on my essay on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 12:16 GMT ...

Thank you for agreement on point D) and E) and your words on Point F).......

F) I must disagree with the following “…A.5. Don’t make the mathematics too complex with thousands of multiple possible solutions…). Depending on the proposed theory (of quantum gravity in particular) the mathematics required is highly complex. M-theory (for instance) requires the extra spatial dimensions and an implication that is highly complex is where one would see the Holographic Principle emerge. “…All your time will be wasted which was spent for developing such system of mathematics to describe a physical system…” For instance such proposals include the proposition that posited extra dimensions exist and exist at the Plank scale and are tightly curled up. Imaginary (and complex) numbers have vast implications in the [hard] sciences...................

The more complex the mathematics the more complex solutions will be. For example, I saw many solutions to Einsteins General theory of relativity dont have any physical significance. Even in some of some of the widely accepted solutions there are there are singularities, and requirements of dark matter and dark energy etc....

I told in that context...

Best regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 11:01 GMT
Dear Dale Carl Gillman

Thank you for your document as I posted on my essay on Mar. 19, 2020 @ 12:16 GMT ...

Thank you for agreement on point G) and H) and your words on Point I).......

I) Perhaps I’m misunderstanding C.1. but are you listing the criteria for a newly revised requirements that would allow for a new cosmological paradigm?..........

My essay applicable for any theory in any bracnch of science. Here I am discussing an EXAMPLE theory known as "DYNAMIC UNIVERSE MODEL", for Cosmology.

best regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 20, 2020 @ 11:19 GMT
Dear Dale Carl Gillman

Thank you for your document and your words......................

J) In C.2. “…Concept should come out from the depth of truth…” This was unclear, as was a definition for “perfection”.

K) I don’t know the nature of time “…Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only…”

Additionally, on “…I think I can add few words........ the ultimate of the quest in philosophy is very difficult to understand. Describing in words is very difficult........ what do you say?” ...................................

Reply...............

J) Take only literal meanings.

k) Take time like that “…Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only…” that is sufficient.

You are correct about Philosophy. These Philosophers dont know what they are searching!!!!!

Thank you for all your wonderful comments and blessings for my essay.

Best wishes to your essay ...

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Paul N Butler wrote on Mar. 22, 2020 @ 18:52 GMT
This is a copy of my return comment to your previous comment to me on my paper’s page on Mar. 21, 2020

Dear Satyavarapu,

I am glad that you recognize some of the problems that currently exist in the scientific community. It is true that the necessary changes will only occur if people truly learn to love one another. I have found that there is only one way to acquire that kind of love and most don’t go where they can get it.

I read your paper and it did not seem to cover any new information from that which was in the paper we talked about earlier, but most of it seemed to be referring to various links, which I have not yet had time to check out. Have you seen any observational experiments yet that show frequency upshifting of photons that travel toward a massive object like a star and if so, does it check for down shifting as the photons travel away from the massive object? If I remember right it seems to me that the other question that I had was with the idea of no collisions between bodies, since we see collisions all the time around us. You can’t play billiards without the balls colliding with each other. On larger scales, pictures have been taken through telescopes of galaxies colliding, etc. It may be that I just need a more detailed understanding about that concept. How do you define that no collisions between bodies in your understanding? If you have found any new concepts that weren’t in your previous paper, what are they.

Have you ever noticed that wow is mom upside down?,

Paul

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 14:36 GMT
Dear Prof Paul N Butler

1.

…………………….. Your words………………….

I am glad that you recognize some of the problems that currently exist in the scientific community. It is true that the necessary changes will only occur if people truly learn to love one another. I have found that there is only one way to acquire that kind of love and most don’t go where...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
post approved

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 14:36 GMT
2.

Dear Prof Paul N Butler

…………….. Your words…………………. Have you seen any observational experiments yet that show frequency upshifting of photons that travel toward a massive object like a star and if so, does it check for down shifting as the photons travel away from the massive object? ………………………..

My...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
post approved


Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 14:36 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu,

Thank you for your remarks.

First, have no fear because I am not a prof, nor am I connected to an Institution, so no Walls.

The mathematics I got at the University of Delft are mostly forgotten, so I try to think free and simple.

(A6) Yes indeed I use the expression singularity, the reason is that Total Simultaneity is out of reach for us, and I have no other means of expression.

B 1/4: I fully agree.

B5 may become verifiable when we create a quantum computer and the result is that we created Artificial Consciousness(not AI).so until now it is not verifiable but in the future, it will be.

B 6/9 fully agreed upon.

C1: In my opinion, there are too many NO's for an emergent reality, if you accept all that NO's you are describing my Total Simultaneity.

C 2: I am a great fan of FREE THINKING.

C 3: Now you come back after accepting all the no's, you are entering a model with all the rules and dimensions that belong in an emergent phenomenon like our reality. OF course, this is your interpretation of this emergent phenomenon and as I also argue: We just don't know. You and I are just adding conscious interpretations. Who am I to say you are wrong?

C 4: Each model is remaining just a model with only partially events that are involved. (The further you go into history the lesser the chance that you exists, see my article https://www.academia.edu/40946114/The_TOTAL_SIMULTANEITY_INT
ERPRETATION

I agree with your conclusion No BB.

Your conclusion is about the development of new interpretations of our reality, I think we both are on that way you with your DUM (but only shortly explained in your essay) and I with my Total Simultaneity Interpretation.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Bookmark and Share
post approved

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 25, 2020 @ 14:29 GMT
Respected Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you for confirming your post which I posted on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:13

My login failed and I got it back today....

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Avtar Singh wrote on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 00:50 GMT
Dear Gupta Ji

You earlier mentioned that you have given high ratings to my essay and asked me to reciprocate.

Following my review of your essay and some valid questions/criticism of your essay, you decided to give me extremely low ratings in revenge. Why?

I have responded to all your posts and still have many unanswered questions to related to the Dynamic Universe model.

Please have an open mind to review and rate essays in accordance with its relevance to the topic of the essay competition.

Best Regards

Avtar Singh

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 12:19 GMT
Respected Prof Avtar Singh Sir,

Thank you for your post in my Essay. I was working on Dynamic Universe Model for the last 40 years. Many books and papers were published. As this is N-Body problem solution none of the academicians in Physics appriciated my efforts. No one ever supported in my life.

I showed in my essay about the problems this model solved. Hope you read them. these were continuing even today. My Mail Id was removed from this forum two times.

People directly criticized indirectly stabbed on the back, i think you are well aware of these ...

I am a retired person from a steel plant in 2014, Non doctorate, main stream refused a seat in PhD for 'A' person like me. I dont have any earnings now except from my savings before 2014. What revenge I take with you sir?

Any way i am contacting FQXi for a rivision, hope you will reciprocate...

Best wishes to your essay sir

Best

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 11:15 GMT
Here is a copy of Paul N Butler reply to my post on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 14:36 GMT in his essay

.......................

Author Paul N Butler replied on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 21:26 GMT

Dear Satyavarapu,

1. You are right about the problems. As I covered in my paper the root cause is that man has laws written into him that are contrary to the laws that are in accordance to love...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 11:25 GMT
Respected Professor Paul N Butler

………….. Your words………………….………………………..

1. You are right about the problems. As I covered in my paper the root cause is that man has laws written into him that are contrary to the laws that are in accordance to love for one another. This causes men to act in ways that are not best for others or even themselves in the long run…………….

My reply……………………………….

Well said, love is expiring and Money is ruling………………………..

…………..Your words……………….. It is right that most researchers want to support mainstream physics because they want to get the financial support to live off of and to do their research. They do this because they realize that the rules of those in control are such that if they present anything contrary to mainstream physics concepts, they will not get that support. ……………………… My reply……………………………….

Yes you are correct, People should not do any thinking on their own, Main stream is correct, that’s it. No arguments.

…………….. Your words………………….

Those in control made those rules to support their own public credibility and financial situation because they realize that if some new concept shows that they have made errors or if the new theory fills in blanks in understanding that they were not able to, they will appear to be less competent than the new person who could correct or fill in with new information. This reasoning is valid to them because of their built-in law that self-survival is more important than group survival and progress. Only love for others can overpower that law.

……………………….. My reply……………………………….

Well said, I will add, if the mainstream fails, pour more money and cook up results. There no love for humanity or scientific progress.

I will continue to next post please...

Best

=snp

Bookmark and Share


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 11:44 GMT
Respected Prof Butler

This is in continuation to my above post

…………….. Your words………………….

2. It looks like your hypothesis is still the same and you still have not seen any experimental evidence for the concept that light photon’s frequencies are increased when they approach a large mass and are not decreased again as they later travel away from the...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Paul Schroeder wrote on Mar. 29, 2020 @ 19:45 GMT
Gupta,

I am pleased to see your continuation toward a paradigm shift.

As you may recall we communicated multiple times during the foundation contest and I have your Frequency Shifting papers. It seems that you and I are the only cosmologists with full blown theories addressing the many flaws in the theories in use today. You have your Dynamic Universal Model and I have my Universe is Otherwise model. I do have a couple of comments about your current paper and your main-points paper.

I will provide more details but first I mention our major differences. We disagree about the nature of space including your accepting a closed universe, rather than accepting infinity of space. You had called my infinite universe as ‘really good’. Likewise your continuing acceptance of expansion seems odd. As light is a real thing, it becomes obvious that gravity ultimately must affect light’s velocity, thus causing red shifts (refer to the Pound-Rebka experiments). Light flows as if beams and assigning it a fixed speed of c is to blame for the ‘standard model’. Light is an EM radiation and some frequency of radiation penetrates everything. So EM radiation is the medium of space and provides gravity by pushing. Likewise, the Newton laws require ‘no friction in space’ which is invalid and so the drive of orbitals provided by bent radiation flow remains overlooked. Newton knew that. Thus rotations provide revolutions of other bodies.

I really admire your work. If your views ultimately come around to include my ideas, I would honor your professionalism, continuing commitment, and leadership, traits which I don’t have. Thus I suggest you should take the paradigm lead and I would be happy to include my work as additions to your work.

Please respond and I will continue with points about your current paper here.

Congratulation on the activity.

Paul Schroeder

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 30, 2020 @ 00:15 GMT
Dear Paul Schroeder ,

Thank you for remembering me, thank you for your kind words of appreciation !!

I remember well about our communication. Hope you have done some more work on your "Universe is Otherwise" Model, like developing some more math support etc.... I will go through your paper and I will comment there ASAP. Yes you correctly said, you and I are cosmologists who oppose Bigbang.

Our Universe is Closed, No "energy" or "Matter" goes out of Universe. Well OK.I remember saying it is really good. Infinite Universe do have some problem , if you calculate radiation falling on a unit area due to infinite number of stars/Galaxies, that Unit area will become infinitely bright. I did not remember how you overcame that problem.

I will continue in another post.

Best Regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share


Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 30, 2020 @ 01:06 GMT
Dear Paul Schroeder ,

I was just reading your essay, I got some comments. I am witing in accordance with your points....

a. I fully agree , Light will bend, Its Frequency upshifts, and its speed also varies slightly.

b. God is the consciousness of the Universe, for that matter if it is finite or infinite it does not matter, Multiple Universes are not required for that ....

Infinite Universe do have some physical problem , if you calculate radiation falling on a unit area due to infinite number of stars/Galaxies, that Unit area will become infinitely bright. How you overcame that problem........

c. Well said, Gravity is the reason for motion in the Universe.

Infinite Space will provide infinite gravity??? I dont think space is having relation to Gravity. Number of Masses will have number of Gravitational pulls,resultant vector force decides motion of that Mass.

d. Why are you calling gravitational attraction as Push? Probably you mean it is a pull. Hence resultant of Multiple attraction forces (pushes) will make a body to move. This is what exactly Dynamic Universe Model also says

Best wishes

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 30, 2020 @ 01:28 GMT
Dear Paul Schroeder ,

There are blue shifted galaxies and red shifted galaxies in the universe.. Universe is rotating. Assume a children's giant wheel in a amusement park, you are looking at it in its plane of rotation.Some buckets come near to you and some will go away. Those which are coming near are Blue shited and going away are red shifted.

Now assume many giant wheels each rotating about its own axis and these wheels are rotating rotating Dynamically in different planes about each other. You are in a bucket in a wheel. then you see the some buckets come near and some go away in all directions. so if you observe only those buckets which are going away you will see expanding , only those coming near to you you will see contracting universe.

I hope this explains...

Please check my blog for further details...

Best regards

=snp

Bookmark and Share



Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 5, 2020 @ 18:44 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, I really like your model of the dynamic Universe, but why don't you like my neocartesian generalization of modern physics? After all, when Copernicus noticed that the Earth revolves around the Sun, he lost sight of the fact that with it all the circumsolar space (ether) revolves around him. Electromagnetic waves are also oscillations of space (ether), which we do not see, but feel in the form of heat or light. Descartes has ether as matter! I hope that the neocartesian generalization of modern physics will find understanding in India.

I invite you to discuss my essay, in which I show the successes of the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, based on the identity of space and matter of Descartes: “The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich »

      At the very beginning of the essay, I repeat twice the idea that rectilinear motion, in essence, is a motion around a circle of infinitely large radius and, if this radius is reduced, then in infinitesimal laws of motion according to the theory of relativity will go over to the laws of quantum mechanics. Next come mathematical formulas that only spoil my essay, but without them in any way. I will be pleased if you catch their main meaning and bless me for the further generalization of modern physics. I give high ratings to those who visit my page and leave her comment on it regarding the neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, even if they did not agree.

Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.