Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Lachlan Cresswell: on 5/23/20 at 2:17am UTC, wrote Dear Wilhelmus, I never got to your essay during the competition for which...

Lorraine Ford: on 5/18/20 at 13:07pm UTC, wrote Dear Wilhelmus, P.S. I’m sorry for being so disagreeable! Regards, ...

Lorraine Ford: on 5/18/20 at 4:14am UTC, wrote Dear Wilhelmus, I’m not sure that I can agree with your contention that...

Vladimir Fedorov: on 5/16/20 at 12:45pm UTC, wrote Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde, Glad to read your work again. I greatly...

Pavel Poluian: on 5/14/20 at 12:45pm UTC, wrote Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde! Thank you for your interesting essay. We think...

Wilhelmus de Wilde: on 5/11/20 at 7:32am UTC, wrote Dear Michal James. "MEMORY" is just a time-effect in our emergent reality....

Michael Kewming: on 5/10/20 at 20:37pm UTC, wrote Hi Wilhelmus, That you for the very original essay. One of the essential...

Wilhelmus de Wilde: on 5/6/20 at 8:04am UTC, wrote Thank you, Michael, I will read and comment on your essay best regards ...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "Georgina, Describe in words, or other symbols: - What "consciousness"..." in How does the brain...

Lorraine Ford: "Steve, “I am going to be frank with respect, you have no idea about”..." in Round Table on 'Varieties...

Georgina Woodward: ""Consciousness and agency are a single undivided piece." Lorraine ford...." in How does the brain...

Steve Dufourny: "I search a road with the spherical topological geometrical algebras that I..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "Lorraine, I am going to be frank with respect, you have no idea about this..." in Round Table on 'Varieties...

Georgina Woodward: "A short book, newly published on Amazon. The Right Time by Georgina..." in The Nature of Time

Steve Dufourny: "I forgot these pions , they are interesting also like the kaons The Pion..." in Alternative Models of...

Joe Schindler: "Neural correlates, computational correlates, and the prospects of..." in Neural correlates,...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.


FQXi FORUM
May 13, 2021

CATEGORY: Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020) [back]
TOPIC: THE COMPLETELY UNKNOWN by Wilhelmus de Wilde [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Feb. 29, 2020 @ 18:27 GMT
Essay Abstract

The development of human knowledge his technical evolution is compared to the experienced scale of “existence” of the universe only a second. I argue that the undecidability, the uncomputability and the unpredictability originate from the source where our reality emerges from: Total Simultaneity (TS). Because of the strict separation of the emergent phenomenon and its origin, the real NOW (Point Zero in TS) becomes unapproachable and is completely unknown. The seemingly FLOW of time and space is caused by the partial consciousness (the “I”) of an agent, that is interconnected with Total Consciousness in TS. Consciousness is the origin of the emerging experience of the Flow of time and space. In the Total Simultaneity Interpretation ALL split-ups from the Many World Interpretation are gathered together, at a split-up one line is followed and the other stays in TS as a probability. Our present Artificial Intelligence is just Intelligence without a conscious connection in TS, decisions are not made in the relative future through a partial consciousness of AI and are staying pure algorithms. Maybe through quantum computers we will be able to let emerge Artificial Consciousness. The much sought for Reference of Reference resides in TS, the utmost reference we have is our own partial consciousness. Our reality is just one of an infinity, an emergent phenomenon strictly separated from the Reference of Reference (TS) and its most for us tedious qualities are the Undecidability, Uncomputability and Unpredictability

Author Bio

Alumnus (1987) Technical University Delft (Holland) , Independent researcher.

Download Essay PDF File
Note: This Essay PDF was replaced on 2020-03-25 10:48:58 UTC.

Bookmark and Share


Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Mar. 1, 2020 @ 11:11 GMT
In your picture in the essay, you denote time as something that has physical existence and something could exist in time. This is not correct.

Yes, time is only the sequential order of events running in space where the entire universe is simultaneous. This is the vision of "The Third Revolution of Physics" proposed by Dr. Julian Barbour. He wins the first prize once on FQXI.

I will not give any valuation of any essay because all this is just a game. The award will get people from known universities. Not me and not you. I'm happy to be able to expose here on FQXI BB cosmology is false. But more I do not expect.

I'm from Slovenia and for American physics, we are considered "stupid". You can do whatsoever, you will never be awarded.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 10:10 GMT
Thank you, Amrit for your answer.

I observe some displeased feelings in your answer and I do understand it.

You are right if you are not connected to an institution it is not easy to come through and to be taken seriously.

Regarding time: I perceive time as a restriction from what you cal "the simultaneous universe" and I cal Total Simultaneity. You can call it "dimension", but it is NOT material. I also say that the sequential order of events is creating the experience of time. This sequential order is the time-line we are experiencing but in Total Simultaneity, it is just a POINT.

So I think we are not at all so far away from each other.

best regards

Wilhelmus.

Bookmark and Share


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 4, 2020 @ 15:10 GMT
Prof Wilde

Nice Essay

Excellent closing sentence

…………………….but remember Undecidability, Unaccountability and Unpredictability will always be an essential part of the freedom of our lives…………………….

And

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability are very much undesirable properties and out-comes of any theory. That theory might have developed by a very reputed person or by a group of well-educated and knowledgeable persons. There is no point of poring resources, money and highly educated man power into that theory when that theory is failing on above three points.

In my essay just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the “ real open thinking” is supported. Have a look at my essay please.

“A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy”

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 4, 2020 @ 21:09 GMT
Hi,

If you are replying any of comments I posted on your essay, I request you to post a copy or intimation that you posted reply, on my essay

“A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy”

also,they will intimate me,so that I can continue discussion….

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 5, 2020 @ 10:27 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu,

Thank you for your remarks.

First, have no fear because I am not a prof, nor am I connected to an Institution, so no Walls.

The mathematics I got at the University of Delft are mostly forgotten, so I try to think free and simple.

(A6) Yes indeed I use the expression singularity, the reason is that Total Simultaneity is out of reach for us, and I have no other means of expression.

B 1/4: I fully agree.

B5 may become verifiable when we create a quantum computer and the result is that we created Artificial Consciousness(not AI).so until now it is not verifiable but in the future, it will be.

B 6/9 fully agreed upon.

C1: In my opinion, there are too many NO's for an emergent reality, if you accept all that NO's you are describing my Total Simultaneity.

C 2: I am a great fan of FREE THINKING.

C 3: Now you come back after accepting all the no's, you are entering a model with all the rules and dimensions that belong in an emergent phenomenon like our reality. OF course, this is your interpretation of this emergent phenomenon and as I also argue: We just don't know. You and I are just adding conscious interpretations. Who am I to say you are wrong?

C 4: Each model is remaining just a model with only partially events that are involved. (The further you go into history the lesser the chance that you exists, see my article https://www.academia.edu/40946114/The_TOTAL_SIMULTANEITY_INT
ERPRETATION I agree with your conclusion No BB.

Your conclusion is about the development of new interpretations of our reality, I think we both are on that way you with your DUM (but only shortly explained in your essay) and I with my Total Simultaneity Interpretation.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Bookmark and Share

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 10:09 GMT
Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Thank you for nice comparison of Both essays.

You are correct, concepts are same wordings are different.

I am just posting your post on my essay.

N-body problem solution solves all these problems which is explained by all these 'NO's !!!

Best wishes to Total Simultaneity Interpretation!!!

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 8, 2020 @ 15:37 GMT
Hi Wilhelmus,

Great essay and deep original ideas.

But there are a few questions.

1. According to the history of the thinking of mankind. You began your research only with the opening of fire. I believe that it is necessary to investigate the entire line of anthropogenesis of the genus Homo, starting with Homo habilis, from the first tool - the “chopper”. This is about three million years ago. And further to the modern historical “point” - a nuclear missile with a separable warhead controlled by “artificial intelligence”. If we look at this whole path, we will see on this path there are reference events - “points”: the birth of homo erectus, the opening of fire, the appearance of a Neanderthal, the birth of homo sapiens (“mitochondrial Eve”), the “Neolithic revolution.” That is, Six reference points in the becoming of consciousness.

In my “Archeology of consciousness” I consider these reference “points” as turning points (inversion and reversal of consciousness). If you remember, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin set the task in the “Phenomenon of Man” to construct a curved line of consciousness from space and time To solve this problem, I introduced the concept of "vector of consciousness"(1990).

Then we get an interesting “curved line”: we, all of Humanity, now do not climb the “mountain” under the name Knowledge, but we have been falling for 10 thousand years after the Neolithic revolution into the “country” called “Ego”.

Here, at the point of modernity, - the Big Existential Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability for Humanity. But in science - a little undecidability, uncomputability, unpredictability...

Respectfully,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 9, 2020 @ 09:44 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Thank you for your comments.

About the history of thinking as I treat it in my essay, it is only indicating the short time that we are exploring sciences, it is not the main item of my entry.

Furthermore, I also indicate that this our "social memory3 in our emergent phenomenon Reality. So these memories are also emergent phenomena, originating from Total Simultaneity (and Total Consciousness) the Point Zero. These memories can change each moment the Point Zero of an agent changes (going into the future..which is a choice between an infinity of choices).

History, so, is for me just a moment that can change each new moment...

best reagrds

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share

Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Mar. 9, 2020 @ 16:40 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

Many thanks! Please explain what is the ontological structure of the «Point Zero?

Respectfully,

Vladim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 12, 2020 @ 10:47 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Ontological means the metaphysical basis of "being".

Being is a process that is time-related.

In my perception, it is only the past that seems to be time-related and therefore NOT the dimensionless Point Zero.

Ontology is a method of interpretation in our emerged phenomenon reality that leads to attempts to understanding "being".

I hope this explains your question.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Wanpeng Tan wrote on Mar. 8, 2020 @ 17:39 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

Thanks for your interesting essay. I enjoyed reading your recount of the history of humanity.

Your concept of TS seems to me that it might be connected to quantum planckian. I'd recommend you to take a look at loop quantum gravity or spin foam theory.

Best wishes,

Wanpeng

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 9, 2020 @ 10:12 GMT
Dear Wanpeng,

Thank you for reading my essay.

I am familiar with the theory of the Lewandowski Group and Caro Rovelli. He argues that space-time is structurally somewhat similar to a fabric, it consists of a large number of very small fibres entangled in LOOPS. My perception of space-time-gravity is that it is an emergent phenomenon originating from Total Simultaneity. The seemingly Flow of time and space as an emergent conscious agent is experiencing is an illusion. It originates from time-space-gravity and dimensionless eternal Point

Regarding the connection that you are indicating to quantum-Planckian, it is indeed the Quantum length and time that are for me (as yet) the borders of our emerging phenomenon called reality. I argue that from an emergent phenomenon the Planck length and time cannot be reached and so they are the limits of our reality (illusion).

best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Bookmark and Share


Eckard Blumschein wrote on Mar. 10, 2020 @ 03:51 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Doesn't "the real NOW (Point Zero in Total Simultaneity)" contradict to Einstein's Relativity of time and to the fatal so called BU (block universe), not to mention my suggestion:calculate as if there was an accepted natural zero of (elapsed) time?

Eckard

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 18:36 GMT
Thank you for reading my essay Eckard.

Einstein's relativity theory is a product of the emerged phenomenon called Reality. The real Now in my interpretation in Total Simultaneity. An emergent phenomenon and Total Simultaneity are totally separated entities. So, NO it is not contradicting Einstein. The Block universe is a totality of past, now and future model. So same interpretation.

I will go read your essay tomorrow.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Joseph Maria Hoebe wrote on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 20:33 GMT
Hi Wilhelmus,

I propose a new interpretation of our Reality and the role of consciousness of agents. That would be great indeed.

In 2009, when we met on LinkedIn this was already our discussion. Since then research in consciousness and its possible physical characteristics has improved, and I think it will improve more, but for now, it is still way ahead.

Therefore, let me say something to your essay.

I found it hard to read. It seems to me that you made it so dense because of the essay restrictions. And it is a difficult theme. I thought reading it, what is it to me? What can I do with it? How to make this practical applicable? I am an inventor and I always look for applications. And nothing came up. That is a pity for me. So I have to let it wonder through my mind. TS and Point Zero I like as idea. I will go through it a few times more and then I contact you by email. Thanks for your essay.

Bests,

Jos

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 12, 2020 @ 10:36 GMT
Thank you very much, Jos for trying to understand my essay.

We both come from different worlds, you an inventor of practical things and me just a person being busy with thinking. But that means that both our activities are the same: THINKING.

I am just giving another NEW interpretation of Physics which resolves a lot of problems they are having nowadays. It is very difficult to do so when you are not affiliated with an institution.

If you have any specific problems to understand pls do not hesitate to ask me, I am always there for questions and critics.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 12, 2020 @ 16:36 GMT
Hello Wihelmus, happy to see your essay at this Contest, Beautiful one,

regards

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on Mar. 15, 2020 @ 10:58 GMT
Thank you Steve,

Pls pay attention to the "Subjective Simultaneity Sphere"

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 19:30 GMT
Hi Wilhelmus,

Thanks for your appreciation of mine. I've now finished you, 2nd time of asking! I did struggle a little to tie down you meaning at first, but we can think alike so once tuned in I followed your track. Nice to see read a different approach to mine but mutually consistent in so many ways.

Do you really think we're 'at the beginning'? (p2) As theory is increasingly bogged down in a doctrinal rut, and the planet has growing issues I increasingly fear we may have had our time! But I'm an optimist so keep trying!

I see you like Everitts "Many Worlds" theory. I confess I find it to etherial when we have practical matters to update. It apparently fell out of fashion due to it's lack of evidence and unfalsifiability, though you'll have seen I do agree the shared 'infinite sets' basis, though I certainly agree with Brouwer who we both cite, and importantly that so called 'collapse is CAUSAL caused by the interaction.

I struggle to agree the comment you cite about 64 bit Quantum Computers, (partly as I've shown they're probably a pipedream as based on flawed assumptions! but you correctly point back to the Planck units.

An all round 'well done'. Interesting and original. Good score coming, though I'll save it until I've read more essays. Congrats at your sojurn at No1. I'm a little envious as so few seem to be reading this year!

Very best

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Anonymous replied on Mar. 15, 2020 @ 10:50 GMT
Dear Peter,

I am NOT AT ALL a fan of Everetts MWI, on the contrary, I introduce a NEW Interpretation, the Total Simultaneity Interpretation (TSI).

In TSI there are no more split-ups. ONE line is proceeding and te other from the split is turning back into Total Simultaneity.

Perhaps it was a mistake to say that ALL future and past split-ups are ONE entity TS. It was just comparing Now we don't have any more split-up material realities to explain quantum physics...

I hope you can understand it better now because this is really the essence of my thinking.

There are more authors who don't understand this subject, so I think I will prepare an addendum and sent it to the participants of the contest. On the other side I don't know if they see it as "publicity" for my essay, so...

Thanks for your attention

Wilhelmus.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Branko L Zivlak wrote on Mar. 17, 2020 @ 10:21 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

Your essay is an outstanding analysis as it is with your essay at a past FQX contest. You have completely and qualitatively satisfied the topic of the competition, and therefore deserve a high score, 8. However, after so much of your engagement, I would expect some predictions, best if it is expressed by formulas .

Having read my essay you will understand my analogy of writing an essay with a forecast of weather.

It's okay to do a good weather analysis for needs outside the weather forecast, but the crown of a good weather analysis is a good weather forecast.

After so much of your involvement, I would expect some predictions expressed by formulas. For me, every essay with predictions (formulas) is a challenge, and even if the formulas are insufficiently proven, I give extraordinary rate to those essays. Imagine, who would have known about Newton with his extraordinary analyzes if the analyzes were not followed by predictions.

Regards Branko

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Mar. 17, 2020 @ 15:13 GMT
Thank you, dear Branco, for reading my participation,

You ask to make "forecasts".(eventually with formula's

I cannot. Why? First of all my maths is not sufficiently developed, and secondly making predictions in an emergent phenomenon (illusion) is a very difficult thing. Expectations yes because they are based on the past events, that are fluctuations inside our memories.

I can try to make a prediction: IF we would be able to come closer to the Planck units of space and time, we would also approach our Point Zero (where our free will resides), and so be closer to the future of our life-lines. Not a bad future.

Thanks

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share

Branko L Zivlak replied on Mar. 18, 2020 @ 13:34 GMT
Comment on comment

“First of all my maths is not sufficiently developed”

This is not true for most contest participants but it is only necessary that they have not forgotten the logarithms. Unfortunately, even those who use the highest mathematics do not understand the role of logarithm, so they do not understand my essay.

“making predictions in an emergent phenomenon (illusion) is a very difficult thing.”

That's true, that's why I worked on the prediction of primordial phenomena (Proton, neutron ...). That is to say, the simple truth is that one must first deal with simpler, then more complicated relationships.

“I can try to make a prediction” . That is right. One philosopher has tried and calculated that we spend about 5g of mass on cognitive processes throughout our lives. The point is, he is neither a physicist nor a mathematician.

Regards Branko

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Mar. 25, 2020 @ 10:49 GMT
Wilhelmus de Wilde re-uploaded the file Wilde_THE_COMPLETELY_UNKNOW.pdf for the essay entitled "THE COMPLETELY UNKNOWN" on 2020-03-25 10:48:58 UTC.

Bookmark and Share
post approved


David Brown wrote on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 12:18 GMT
“… the past is a momentary deterministic written story in our memories and the future an indeterministic unknowable set of choices to be made by the partial consciousness of the emergent agent. …” p. 1

“… Essentially ALL physical theories are thought-models. …” p. 6

“ … If we could predict our whole life what would be the purpose of living it? …” p. 8

What precisely are choices? What precisely are thoughts?

According to Steven Weinberg, “The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.”

’”The First Three Minutes” by Steven Weinberg, 1993, Basic Books, p. 154

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Mar. 26, 2020 @ 14:13 GMT
Thank you David for your remarks.

In my perception choices are not made in the past, the Now is an unreachable moment of the future but it is "here" where the choices are made through the partial consciousness of the agent. We are living in the past...

Thoughts are an agent's. conscious experiences in the emerging flow of time. Thinking is becoming aware of one's consciousness, so is a meditation where we are trying to come free from the troubles that are consuming our pasts, we are trying to come closer to Total Simultaneity, the POINT Zero that contains the ALL.

I don't fully agree with Steven Weinberg, because the more we "think" we understand the more we understand that this comprehension is only an infinite little part of ALL there is to understand. You become aware of the relativity of human life towards the whole shebang of our universe (micro and macro). It seems then pointless what your thoughts are adding, they are only a sparkle in infinity. But then I remember that an infinite line without a specific point is no more that specific line but becomes two lines. Then I think that even my minor thoughts, my whole life, is NOT wholly pointless, but is needed to bring two infinities together...

just a thought

Best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Christian Corda wrote on Apr. 2, 2020 @ 13:13 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

You wrote a provocative and speculative, but also interesting and nice Essay. I have a lot of fun in writing it. In particular, I understood the meaning of "Total Simultaneity" which was not clear to me in your comments in my FQXi Essay page. I also agree with your conclusion that "Undecidability, Unaccountability and Unpredictability will always be an essential part of the freedom of our lives." I am going to give you a well deserved high score. Good luck in the Contest!

Cheers, Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Apr. 2, 2020 @ 14:23 GMT
Thank you very much, Christian.

I understand that "Total Simultaneity" is not easy to understand as an idea, because it is a new and not yet well-known approach.

I would like to try to write an article that can be published in arXiv, but I need an endorsement, and I am not affiliated with an institution (only alumnus of the Technical University Delft.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Apr. 11, 2020 @ 18:10 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

You and I have agreed some in the past, but this time I think my essay supports yours, as I understand TS.

Einstein’s special relativity demolished universal simultaneity in favor of the ‘relativity of simultaneity’; in which case there is no NOW. As I understand TS, it is an awareness of the unity of Being/Becoming. You beautifully sum up the 3 Un’s by saying:

Our acceptance of the three dual qualities is important, without them the tension of life is missing.

While I agree that awareness of Total Simultaneity is paramount [I believe Abraham Maslow refereed to it as ‘Peak Experience’] I think physics must be formulated in a more mundane or ‘objective’ fashion, and that is essentially in terms of energy flow in the eternal NOW, as opposed to the discombobulated multiple time frames of special relativity.

I do agree with you that time is not ‘material’ or actually a ‘dimension’. It is probably best understood as complementary or dual to energy.

In any case, you might enjoy my essay: Deciding on the nature of time and space.

Best regards. It’s good to find old friends honing and improving their views to share with the world, and FQXi gives a wonderful forum to do so.

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Apr. 12, 2020 @ 11:04 GMT
Dear Edward,

First of all it is good to meet again, I read already your comments before you participated in this contest, and I fully agreed and thank you for reading my essay.

While reading your essay I made the following remarks:

Special relativity is indeed not as simple as it seems, because it analyses an emergent phenomenon, as you say the “ontology” of space and time...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Michael muteru wrote on May. 6, 2020 @ 07:37 GMT
wilhelmus,very wide crosscutting essay. I like how you relate consciousness to AI. rated you well. I too have tried something on cognitive bias here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.hope you like it.all the best in the essay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde replied on May. 6, 2020 @ 08:04 GMT
Thank you, Michael,

I will read and comment on your essay

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Michael James Kewming wrote on May. 10, 2020 @ 20:37 GMT
Hi Wilhelmus,

That you for the very original essay. One of the essential ingredients for TS appears to be memory. I was wondering if you had given much thought into how the loss of memory actually aids learning? In many learning algorithms, there is some degree of coarse graining and 'forgetfullness' required to generalise models. As was shown in Maxwell's demon, this forgetting is essential to the entropic increase and the second law of thermodynamics.

You might find my essay interesting. I consider how this never ending tide of rising entropy limits our construction of Turing machines. You might find some useful ideas in for your notion of TS.

Thanks,

Michael

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on May. 11, 2020 @ 07:32 GMT
Dear Michal James.

"MEMORY" is just a time-effect in our emergent reality. (so it originates from a Point in a Point of TS).

I will read your essay, I promise, but today I am hospitalized for an operation on my colon where they will take away a tumour. I will have to stay ca 12 days before coming home.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share


Pavel Vadimovich Poluian wrote on May. 14, 2020 @ 12:45 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde!

Thank you for your interesting essay. We think the same, although we don't always agree with you. If there is only a moment NOW, then this allows you to build a curious model. Time consists of many moments. Let's imagine these moments as a single set, in which each element has a special property: it is real only when other moments are not real. We call such objects areal sets. Formulating the law of contradiction, Aristotle and all the logicians after him constantly emphasized: there cannot be A and NOT-A in the same respect at the same TIME.

Pavel Poluian and Dmitry Lichargin,

Siberian Federal University.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on May. 16, 2020 @ 12:45 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Glad to read your work again.

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: “Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus”, due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 “Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability”.

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Lorraine Ford wrote on May. 18, 2020 @ 04:14 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

I’m not sure that I can agree with your contention that “real free-will is residing in the unreachable Total Simultaneity outside the emergent phenomenon of our reality” or that the “conscious agent[‘s] … consciousness … is entangled with Point Zero”, because this seems to indicate that there is something in effect outside the universe controlling the universe.

Why do you consider that our universe and the things in it are inferior things, mere puppets, that need something in effect from outside the universe to explain (e.g.) their free will? Why don’t you consider that free will is happening where it appears to be happening i.e. with the agents themselves? I don’t agree that “Our reality is just one of an infinity of illusions”.

I thought that we could agree that there is no “artificial consciousness”, but even there you seem to think that this is possible with quantum computers.

Regards,

Lorraine

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Lorraine Ford replied on May. 18, 2020 @ 13:07 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

P.S.

I’m sorry for being so disagreeable!

Regards,

Lorraine

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Lachlan Cresswell wrote on May. 23, 2020 @ 02:17 GMT
Dear Wilhelmus,

I never got to your essay during the competition for which I am sorry. As I write this now I expect you are home recovering from what I hope was a successful operation. I went through a similar time 2 years ago with a rare bowel cancer.

Your essay is sublime, impossible to argue with. My position is but a mere subset of your grand TS. It is interesting how so many essays cover the same ground from so many perspectives. I am also reading your "Occupy the Imaginary World of Economy" which is very thought provoking.

I hope you will read my essay at some stage when you are fully recovered.

All the best to you, and thanks for your wonderful essay.

Lachlan Cresswell

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.