Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Ilgaitis Prusis: on 5/17/20 at 12:54pm UTC, wrote Dear Sorli, excellent essay. BB is an artificial model that cannot happen...

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 5/4/20 at 15:33pm UTC, wrote Excellent! The main thing for me is that you are against the "big bang"...

Amrit Sorli: on 5/1/20 at 5:45am UTC, wrote Dear Mark. FQXi is good. We can publish our science here. But remember we...

Michael muteru: on 5/1/20 at 5:07am UTC, wrote Dear Amrit.short but very potent essay.rated you highly.i too think that we...

Amrit Sorli: on 4/30/20 at 15:04pm UTC, wrote Vladimir, BB cosmology belongs to the history of physics. yours amrit

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 4/30/20 at 11:57am UTC, wrote Dear Amrit, I have read your essay and comments with great interest....

Amrit Sorli: on 4/25/20 at 5:17am UTC, wrote seems that electromagnetic vacuum is so loaded with 5G that this radiation...

Amrit Sorli: on 4/10/20 at 21:21pm UTC, wrote for Slovenian readers


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "So what exactly is WRONG with physics, apart from the fact that physics..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "The perception generated of time difference relates to the potential..." in Anatomy of spacetime and...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello Jim, yes indeed in a sense we have these motions and we have invented..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, Clearly we have motion in our Universe. It is not..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Steve Dufourny: "You are welcome, thanks too for your words. I have never lost the faith..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "For completeness: Concerning The curved spacetime of GR. Alteration of the..." in Anatomy of spacetime and...

Georgina Woodward: "Thank you. Good luck." in The Nature of Time

Lorraine Ford: "Rob, As you have not replied, I take it that you now concede that the..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.


FQXi FORUM
September 16, 2021

CATEGORY: Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020) [back]
TOPIC: Measurability and Computability of the Universe by Amrit Srecko Sorli [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 23, 2020 @ 17:37 GMT
Essay Abstract

Measurability and computability of the universe show that Big Bang cosmology is in serious troubles. It is time to re-examine Big Bang cosmology and solve the troubles that the computability of the Big Bang cosmology has shown.

Author Bio

Amrit Sorli is founder of bijective research methodology. He has published around 100 articles and 10m books.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 23, 2020 @ 18:34 GMT
I think BB cosmology might be good 50 years ago. Today seems it is more a history of physics. Thank you to FQXI to publish my idea. Physics needs progress. Together we can manage it.

Yours Amrit

attachments: Black_Holes_are_Rejuvenating_Systems_of_the_Universe_.pdf, 1_Integration_of_Life_and_Consciousness_into_Cosmology_.pdf

Bookmark and Share

David Brown replied on Feb. 26, 2020 @ 10:42 GMT
Are we in agreement on at least 2 points?

(1) Empirical evidence shows that the Lambda-CDM model is wrong.

(2) Someone needs to find a new concept of time in order to correct Big Bang cosmology.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 24, 2020 @ 08:06 GMT
Stephen Hawking and J.B. Hartle published an article in 1983 entitled "Wave Function of the Universe" in the renowned journal Physical Review D. In this article, they say that the universe began from a mathematical point. In 2014, however, NASA measured the universe as infinite, taking the form of Euclidean space. The first thing we need to understand is if the universe is infinite today, it has been and will be infinite forever. Another thing is that if a thing starts from a mathematical point and spreads at any speed, it will always have a finite dimension. Something that has a finite dimension can never evolve into something that has an infinite dimension. These are basic scientific facts, no one disputes them, or yin can deny. Another proof that the Big Bang theory is wrong. Proponents of the Big Bang will say that in the first moments, the universe was expanding at infinite speed, which is mathematical philosophy, not science. The term "infinite speed" cannot be used in science because we do not know what it means. The terms "infinite distance" and "infinite volume" of the universe, however, can be used because it is based on NASA measurements.

Bookmark and Share


David Brown wrote on Feb. 24, 2020 @ 13:06 GMT
"... Big Bang model does not fit into the mapped universe. ... It is time now for the re-examination of Big Bang cosmology." According to Famaey and McGaugh,

"Either (i) there is a vast amount of unseen mass in some novel form—dark matter— or (ii) the data indicate a breakdown of our understanding of dynamics on the relevant scales, or (iii) both."

Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions, Living Reviews in Relativity, volume 15, 7 September 2012

Please consider 4 questions:

(1) Does MOND have many empirical successes?

(2) How likely is it that dark-matter-compensation-constant = 0 ?

(3) How likely is it that dark-matter=compensation-constant = (3.9±.5) * 10^–5 ?

(4) How likely is it that dark matter particles exist?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 24, 2020 @ 14:01 GMT
David your questions have nothing to do with my essay. I just pointed out BB cosmology has troubles. It is too small to fit into the existent universe.

Besides that NASA has measured the universe is infinite.

I discovered the universe does not run in time, time is just numerical order of events in the universal space which is time-invariant. Nothing ever happens in time. These are facts we have to incorporate in cosmology.

attachments: 3_How_many_Models_of_Time_do_we_need_in_Physics_-_personal_copy.pdf, Minkowski_Space-time_and_Einsteins_Now.pdf

Bookmark and Share

David Brown replied on Feb. 24, 2020 @ 14:28 GMT
Consider this question: Is there a maximum wavelength in the physical universe?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Lachlan Cresswell replied on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 02:28 GMT
An equally interesting question is: Is there a maximum frequency in the physical universe?

The highest energy cosmic ray ever observed was around 10^20 ev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 24, 2020 @ 14:35 GMT
David, I'm a physicist, not a mathematical philosopher. Stick to the subject. So we can discuss it.

Bookmark and Share


Lachlan Cresswell wrote on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 03:01 GMT
Your 'computer program' is assuming the Big Bang started off at a point. This assumption is probably wrong. What if the "BB" occurred when the Universe was already flat and a substantial size as a result of a 'phase change' in the primordial energy? Or maybe we should assume the "BB" started after inflation, not before. Both these scenarios do not require an infinite steady-state universe.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Amrit Srecko Sorli replied on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 05:24 GMT
Do no see the universe as a system that exists in some physical time. Time is just the numerical sequential order of events running in universal space. There is no physical time in the universe. This is what Julian Barbour calls "The Third Revolution of Physics". Universal space and cosmological principle are time-invariant. Black holes are rejuvenating systems of the universe which is eternal and non-created.

Inflation is not falsifiable. Read articles on the inflation of Dr. Alan Guth on arxiv. He says that "gravitational energy" is negative and the energy of matter is positive and the sum of both in the universe is always zero. This model is not falsifiable and is against common logic. Read my article attached: Black holes are rejuvenating systems of the universe".

BB cosmology has serious problems that have to be solved in order to remain the leading cosmology model. We have to push physics forward together. FQXI is the right platform for this.

attachments: 2_Black_Holes_are_Rejuvenating_Systems_of_the_Universe_.pdf

Bookmark and Share

Lachlan Cresswell replied on Feb. 26, 2020 @ 05:53 GMT
Dear Amrit

You didn't answer my objection.

I agree with your statement on time, which you can see from my own essay discussing presentism. I also agree that inflation theory is not falsifiable.

However that doesn't mean I believe in a steady state universe, especially when the observational evidence indicates an expanding and accelerating universe.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Branko L Zivlak wrote on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 17:59 GMT
Dear Amrit

I do not agree with your next view:

“It is time now for the re-examination of Big Bang cosmology. If the troubles willnot be solvable, we have to be open to accepting a Stationary universe without begging and without an end is a good model.”

For the one who respected real philosophers of nature, the stationary model was always the right model. It is also the result of my calculations, some of which you can see in the essay.

Regards Branko

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 19:21 GMT
Dear Branko,

this is great, we are already two having the same view. I also think BB cosmology is not right. But you know it will take time to fix this. I could not publish my articles on BB trouble in important journals. We have to be very exact and taking into account the falsifiability of our work.

BB cosmology is not falsifiable.

I'm deeply thankful FQXI for giving us the possibility to present our ideas. My plan is we end BB cosmology in 2020.

Yours Amrit

Bookmark and Share


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 25, 2020 @ 19:27 GMT
Branko please send me the link to your essay.

I cannot find it.

Please send me your email.

My mail is

sorli.bijective.physics@gmail.com

We can work together.

yours amrit

Bookmark and Share


Branko L Zivlak wrote on Feb. 26, 2020 @ 07:30 GMT
Dear Amrit

If you order the essays alphabetically by author last name I am always on the end.

My articles you can find here:

https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Autho
r/145

1/Branko,%20Zivlak

Regards Branko

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Feb. 28, 2020 @ 16:12 GMT
According to Einstein vision on time BB cosmology is dead.

attachments: 4_-_Einsteins_Vision_of_Time_and_Infinite_Universe_without_Singularities_The_End_of_Big_Bang_Cosmology.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Mar. 1, 2020 @ 10:52 GMT
Dear Amrit,

Thank you for a short but very clear essay that explains your position towards the Big Bang.

I know that you are able to write books about the subject, and also I agree with you.

You read my latest article in "Conscious Exploration & Research", in this essay I am still more clearly trying to explain "intellectual try-outs" like the BB.

Good luck in the contest.

Thank you for taking the time and making comment on it.

best rgards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3411

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 04:05 GMT
Dear Amrit ji,

You caught a wonderful point in Bigbang ...."To reach the size of today’s observed and mapped universe, according to the Big Bang model, the universe should expand since its beginning with the speed of 1,02∙109??−1 . The velocity of light is 3∙108??−1?. To reach today radius universe should expand with the velocity v which should be 3,34 times bigger than light speed."

There are 100 more well publicized problems of this theory, like Dark matter, Dark energy, blue shifted Galaxies, Blackholes....... etc..... This 101th.

Then how Bigbang is surviving?

Just only because of UNLiMITED FUNDs availability. Scientists, Authors and researchers were not given freedom. I dont know why?....

I am also a against Bigbang person,

I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the “ real open thinking” is supported. Have a look at my essay please.

“A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy”

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Mar. 6, 2020 @ 04:19 GMT
Dear Gupta,

BB cosmology is not "scientific theory", this is a silly idea. It is not falsifiable, it is not bijective, this is a fairy tale.

I work that in 2020 BB cosmology will become a history of physics.

Nothing in this model works, incredible how still they teach it at universities.

If we will get the support of FQXI than the BB cosmology abolishing process could start. But I hardly believe in their support. At the end of this essay story, they will ignore us and give awards to other researchers. They do not dare to contradict BB cosmology. Today in science you have to follow the mainstream, otherwise, you are out of the game. The game of money and success.

attachments: 5_-_A_THREE-DIMENSIONAL_NON-LOCAL_QUANTUM_VACUUM_AS_THE_ORIGIN_OF_PHOTONS.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Apr. 10, 2020 @ 21:21 GMT
for Slovenian readers

attachments: Gravitacija_in_kmozmologija.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Apr. 25, 2020 @ 05:17 GMT
seems that electromagnetic vacuum is so loaded with 5G that this radiation influences the coherent electromagnetic field of the human organism to the point where the immune system does not work properly anymore

attachments: Covid_5G_Nano_Vaccini_Sorli_Di_Sia_1.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Apr. 30, 2020 @ 11:57 GMT
Dear Amrit,

I have read your essay and comments with great interest. Excellent intellectual attack on the philosophically naive hypothesis of the "big bang".

You write

"What we can measure for sure exists. In order to build the most accurate computable picture of the universe I propose in this essay a bijectivity principle: in the modelling of the universe we will use only what is measurable. We will use only obtained data. ”

I would also add: an understanding of the model of the Universe (for all people on Earth) and its heuristic. First of all, understanding of its ontological structure and, as a consequence, the nature of fundamental constants, the structure of space, the nature of time, information, consciousness.

Did you sign this An Open Letter ?

Where can I read the ontological justification (basification) for your model of the Universe?

With kind regards,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on Apr. 30, 2020 @ 15:04 GMT
Vladimir, BB cosmology belongs to the history of physics.

yours amrit

attachments: 1_4_-_Einstein_Vision_of_Time_and_Infinite_Universe_without_Singularities_-_The_End_of_Big_Bang_Cosmology.pdf, 1_3_-_Black_Holes_are_Rejuvenating_Systems_of_the_Universe.pdf

Bookmark and Share

Vladimir Rogozhin replied on May. 4, 2020 @ 15:33 GMT
Excellent! The main thing for me is that you are against the "big bang" hypothesis. The highest score. But I believe that an ontological justification (basification) is still necessary. Time is a phenomenon and we need to look for a basic noumenon. Plus a hundred-year problem with the "foundations of mathematics", but means with knowledge in general. The crisis of understanding "takes by the throat" not only fundamental science, but also global society.

If you have time, look also at my dialectic-ontological ideas .

With kind regards,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Michael muteru wrote on May. 1, 2020 @ 05:07 GMT
Dear Amrit.short but very potent essay.rated you highly.i too think that we may be losing out a lot by ignoring how it all came to be here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.i think the most popular cosmology theory may be way off Mark.kindly take your time to review.any feedback appreciated.Thanks .All the best

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Amrit Srecko Sorli wrote on May. 1, 2020 @ 05:45 GMT
Dear Mark. FQXi is good. We can publish our science here. But remember we will nevdr get any reward. FQXI will always give awaeds to established prof of physics who are lost in their mind. They are talking nonsense. They are not able to make any progress. This is it. Send me your work on my mail. sorli.amrit@gmail.com

Bookmark and Share


Ilgaitis Prusis wrote on May. 17, 2020 @ 12:54 GMT
Dear Sorli,

excellent essay. BB is an artificial model that cannot happen in nature. I have another model of emergence of Universe. The Universe can also occur without BB. Emergence of Universe from nothing is disclosed in:

Big Bang without Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0037

Before Big Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0141.

More over, this explains the absence of antimatter in the Universe: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330986087_Hypothesi
s_of_Tetraverse.

Best regards

Ilgaitis

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.