Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Anonymous: on 5/7/20 at 20:28pm UTC, wrote And this is the attempt to skech the new mathematics to fit the need for...

Manfred Pohl: on 5/6/20 at 14:00pm UTC, wrote Here i try to look into the future of science in general to give an idea of...

Manfred Pohl: on 5/5/20 at 10:57am UTC, wrote To finally explain the Turing completition of theoretical biology: the...

Manfred Pohl: on 5/3/20 at 20:01pm UTC, wrote BTW. i published Matrix decoded in April 2019: ...

Manfred Pohl: on 5/3/20 at 13:23pm UTC, wrote Finally i learned a lot during the essay contest and the "corona"-crisis...

Manfred Pohl: on 4/30/20 at 5:04am UTC, wrote Dear Michael Muteru, the elephant in the room... yes. I will read your...

Michael muteru: on 4/28/20 at 20:12pm UTC, wrote why are we humans? do we decide our environment or does it decide who we...

Manfred Pohl: on 4/26/20 at 12:03pm UTC, wrote Dear Sirs, i missed the deadline for update due to a quarantaine on Covid...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

jim hughes: "I'm not a mathematician. So what I see here is some smart people who..." in Consciousness and the...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello FQXi, the members and all, I try to do my best to unite and convice..." in Global Collaboration

Lorraine Ford: "The idea of a smooth mathematical evolution of “the wave function”, and..." in Consciousness and the...

Georgina Woodward: "Broken machine: What do[es] I see next? The I that was, E.I, has not been..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Lorraine Ford: "Hi Stefan, I hope that a good leader, and a good political party, is..." in The Present State of...

Lorraine Ford: "We live in an age of computing. But physics, mathematics and philosophy,..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "I've copied the comment to the thread where it belongs. This orphan can be..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Georgina Woodward: "Thank you John. What did you think about the questioning whether altitude..." in The Nature of Time


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Good Vibrations
Microbead 'motor' exploits natural fluctuations for power.

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.


FQXi FORUM
September 28, 2021

CATEGORY: Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020) [back]
TOPIC: It takes a Decision to Decide if Decidability is True or False by Manfred U.E. Pohl [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Jan. 14, 2020 @ 13:33 GMT
Essay Abstract

Turning a discarded (“Descartes”) Coordinate-System into a new (“Newton”) Coordinate-System - [pi / pi :=1 ; pi := c := Meter / Second]

Author Bio

The author is independent Researcher. After first studies in Mathematics and Physics in 1992 the author did a state examination at University of Cologne in business educational science, business information systems and business economics. Beginning 2006 he worked on the Solution to the Problem of Time in Physics with Studies in Motivational Action-Competence in Psychology. In April 2019 the author published for the first time the first results to contribute to a Framework for the ToE and invite specialist to work further on the suggested concept.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Jan. 15, 2020 @ 11:11 GMT
Dear Sirs,

to make the Essay more accessible to an audience it is here attached a visualisation of the unusual denotion of symbol π and the treatment of dimensions and units in a kind of "discrete" geometry.

As time and space in this Essay are understood as elementary particles, geometry is understood to use π as 1,2,3...

In six dimension π could be understood as "3" in this kind of geometry and it is not refering to a "number" like 3.14...

It is said that in symbols of ancient Egypt π was related to (16/9)^2

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhind_Mathematical_Papyrus

This
relates to a usage of π :=3 for a kind of "discrete" geometry, a mathematics "maybe" well described in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus. (I did no studies in this theme and i am not expert in this fields)

In this sense the denotion π := apple / banana could be translated into

π := time^3 / 12 space^3 (to give a nominal definition for the fundaments of mathematics and physics and "explain" the dimensionless number 12)

Thanks for reading, M.U.E. Pohl

attachments: discrete.jpg

Bookmark and Share


Charles John Sven wrote on Jan. 18, 2020 @ 23:06 GMT
This not enjoyable or comprehensible to a non-specialist audience.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Jan. 19, 2020 @ 00:35 GMT
Dear Charles John Sven, i am very sorry to not meet your expactations. I am still learning and maybe next time i can do better. I tried here with pictures http://downloads.theoryofall.org/rhind_papyrus_problem_no_48
_6.pdf

Anyway : Congratulations to your very enjoyable and informative Essay. Best wishes.

M.U.E.P.

Bookmark and Share


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Jan. 20, 2020 @ 09:56 GMT
Dear Manfred U. E. Pohl, the question you raised about the irrationality of the number π is very relevant for the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, which is based on the identity space and matter of Descartes, according to which space moves, since it is matter. I want to note that irrational numbers complement the set of rational numbers to the continuum. This is a very important aspect for materialism. From a philosophical point of view, the irrational number is the smallest source of being, moving matter, a kind of Leibniz monad.

You have a very interesting essay, I wish you to become my opponent.

I invite you to discuss some aspects of the neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, which I set out in my essay: “The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich »

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Jan. 21, 2020 @ 01:24 GMT
Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

thanks for your kind comments on the content of my essay. Yes, it seems like we have some analogy in certain views. I agree to various aspects of your work. In detail it might be the inverse proportional understanding of Energy between GRT and QM (which is the key aspect of my essay) that is different between our approaches. I don't speak of identity of space and matter, because in my model matter is made up from space AND time always. I guess this could be the difference between Descartes view (you) and Newton view (me)

Give me some time to read your essay more carefully and then i will reply in your thread. Maybe we have more in common as it seems at first look.

Best regards M.U.E.P.

Bookmark and Share

Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich replied on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 04:36 GMT
Dear Manfred U. E. Pohl, the fact that you considered me your opponent does not give me a reason for a low rating of your work. You are the only one who bothered to delve into the essence of my essay and compare it with yours. For this I give you the highest rating. Now I see your thoughts even more clearly and am ready to continue to cooperate with you. I will not bother you with your objections so that you focus on other participants in the competition and can get a prize. I wish you every success.

Sincerely, Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Mar. 25, 2020 @ 20:44 GMT
Dear Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich,

thanks a lot for your wishes and kind remarks. I think it would be great if we all could work together and cooperate to "fix" the mistakes in contemporary phyiscs. I guess all of us are driven in a similar way to find a "mistake" or a fix as we "feel" that something is wrong. As said i rate your essay as very helpful and a important contribution in this process. Are we opponent? I don't think so. It is not about winning or loosing so we can't be opponent.

Best Regards

Manfred

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Feb. 14, 2020 @ 00:24 GMT
Dear Sirs,

as the essay was written in a hurry and the Theory is under construction, a few mistakes migth have gone into. One i found now with cross reading:

On page 7 (measurements given in meter and second) there is printed

Electric current Ampere: meter^-2 * second^-3

Obviously this is a type error. It must be meter^-2 * second ^-1

As the Theory behind the Essay is still in development, here can be found some more details about the described 3-Dimensional time:

http://downloads.theoryofall.org/Manfred_Pohl_Problem_o
f_TimeIV_Experimental_Proof.pdf

The development of the System of Units is under construction as well..

some sketch can be given here (might be errors still):

Time T second s

Length L Meter m

Velocity ν m/s m / s

Electric Current I Ampere s / m^2

Magnetic Field H A/m s / m^3

Acceleration a m/s2 m / s^2

Electric Charge Q Coulomb s^2 / m^2

Temperature T Kelvin (K) m^3 / s^2

Entropy S J/K m^3 / s^3

Mass m kilogram m^4 / s^3

Force N Newton m^5 / s^5

Energy Joule m^6 / s^5

Power P Watt m^6 / s^6

Magne Flx Dens. B Tesla m^6 / s^6

Permeability μs H/m m^7 / s^6

Magnetic Flux Φ Weber (Wb) m^8 / s^6

Elec Field Stre V / m m^7 / s^7

Electric Pot φ Volt m^8/ s^7

Capacitance C Farad s^8 / m^10

Electric resit Z Ohm m^10 / s^8







Fine-structure-constant α m / s

Gravitational constant G s / m

Electric Charge Q Coulomb s^2 / m^2

Boltzmans constant kB s^3 / m^3

Planck's constant h s^4 / m^4

Force^-1 F^-1 Newton^-1 s^5 / m^5



The most thrilling units to me of course are Entropy and Temperature and Boltzman's constant... Final theory hopefully end of 2020.

Best regards

MUE Pohl

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Feb. 15, 2020 @ 09:07 GMT
To correct the printing error and to give an overview over physical Units in 2*3 Dim "Time" - "Newtonian" coordinate-system, i add a file with a list of physical units. "under construction", but to give a sketch how it will look like if working with Decidability.

best, MUE Pohl

attachments: 2x3_dim_newtonian_time.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Rodney Bartlett wrote on Feb. 28, 2020 @ 06:51 GMT
I see that our essays have something in common (mine is NON-COMPUTABILITY AND UNPREDICTABILITY ARE SO YESTERDAY: WITH COMPUTABLE AND PREDICTABLE COSMIC STRUCTURE, PLUS IMPLICATIONS FOR MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE: dinosaurs and Einstein). At the end of yours is a picture of dinosaurs and a question asking if the universe will be found within life. Mine refers to Albert Einstein's General Relativity...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Feb. 28, 2020 @ 22:31 GMT
Dear Rodney,

following your invitation i read your essay (not jet in every detail) but can confirm most of your ideas would cover my ideas too. Yes, there must be an quantum entaglement in solar system that is not fully understood yet. There is research needed not only for Mercurey.

Photon becomes the Graviton in my idea.

To make it short.. i more and more try to explain the...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Mar. 10, 2020 @ 17:01 GMT
10 of March and i think i no can offer a more painting summery of the Final Foundation of Physics and Mathematics ...

Label : Taking God out of Physics..

If it is Pontifex Maximus that we have in or if it is Einsteins Cosmic very Special Religion : without calling Einstein to be ca crook and fraud, we cannot advance.

Why am i allowed to label Einstein c crook? In Physics classromm when i was 17 an was teached Einsteins SRT i said ... hey.. this ist the most rubbish nonsense i ever heard. If that would be true, o could go through walls (plasma fusion).

So 1 spend 30 years on the run to find the idiotic mistake that people are doing. Einstein had not stolen my childhood. But Einstein had stolen 30 years of battle against this nonsense.

Mathematical Disproof of God

Deleting Pontifex Maximus out of Universe

Taking Einstein out of Physics

Inserting LOVE (LIFE) into Universe

http://downloads.theoryofall.org/ManfredPohl_Problem
_of_time_VI.pdf

It will be impossible to advance in Physics and take God out and Greta (love) in, if we not blame Einstein to be a crook.

Greta asked us that we must do better as it is not enough what we are doing !

It only takes a decision to help the crying children on this planet.

Usually Children are in constant fear, if live is undecidable, unpredictable und Uncomputeable. By logical reason: Why are we frigthening the children and youth with the Einstein.... ?

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 12:32 GMT
Finally i have to add, that the Essay was very tentative and should be understood as work in progress.

There are some heavy MISTAKES in the essay that must be adressed:

1. BIG Mistake : Unit of Ampere s^3/m^2 is WRONG (printing mistake) Correct is s/m^2

2. BIG Mistake : [1,0] = 12 pi c^3 is WRONG correct is [1;-1]

3. BIG Mistake : Entropy vs negentropy (pi,pi,1,1,1) is WRONG. Correct is (pi,pi,-1,1,1)

I total.. i could now summarize to be the final foundations of Physics and Mathematics in a one-line-bus that run over to be the Pilot Wave of David Bohm:

pi = pi / pi => 1 = 1 / -1

The Observer : [pi,pi,-1,1,1]

The Observed : [pi] (GOD of Mathematics, Pilot Wave of D Bohm)

Best, Manfred U.E. Pohl

Bookmark and Share


Shawn Halayka wrote on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 19:49 GMT
Dear Manfred,

I must admit that your essay is hard to grasp. This is not your fault, but mine.

Have you seen the movie The Fifth Element?

- Shawn

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Shawn Halayka replied on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 19:51 GMT
P.S. Can you please describe the point of the essay in a sentence or two?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Mar. 11, 2020 @ 21:53 GMT
Dear Shawn Halayka,

In one line the point of the essay is easy: We must save the planet NOW. Greta need to be backed up by scientist to perform the Transformation on this planet. Science now must take responsabilty for doing wrong science since 2000 years. I no one is willing to do, I have to do.

My essay should be understood as a "call" for Physicist to do Complete Theory now,...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share

Shawn Halayka replied on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 20:08 GMT
Dear Manfred,

No worries when it comes to getting an assessment. I see that you have a viXra page. Why not post your letters there, rather than writing to politicians?

I'm neither a fan nor a critic of the handling of the current global warming. I once did a small program that visualized the temperatures of the planet over months and years, and I found that there was indeed warming over the last century.

attachments: world.png

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 05:42 GMT
Dear Manfred U.E. Pohl,

Your words................ In this sense, the “Number” 3,14… has no meaning at all in mathematics or in physics. It is not possible to compute something with no meaning, although “1/3 π := 1 apple / 3 banana” as receipt for a salad has a rational physical meaning (thought) included, that is computable, rational and real physical...............are Very good, but later with all the amendments it became hard to follow. You could tell few words as synopsis to me ....

By the way, I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the “ real open thinking” is supported. Have a look at my essay please.

“A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory’s Philosophy”

=snp.gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 08:19 GMT
Dear Sir

Mail is not going to your id....

contact@manfred pohl.de

do you have any other ID? I just gave you highest of appreciation to your essay, best wishes

=snp

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Mar. 13, 2020 @ 09:51 GMT
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

mail should work on

contact@manfred-pohl.de

or

contact@theoryofall.org

I agree with you, that it is hard to follow my texts. Please exuse my flaws in writing.

A synopsis in most general : Since over 2000 years (Pythagoras, Sokrates, Platon, Aristotle) was a fight if earth or sun are center of universe. Today we say: there is no preferred center. This is wrong an must be adressed very soon:

Earth and Sun are a Electromagnetic Dipole and the fixed pointlike center of universe is constructed by taking earth as pointlike Body, Sun as Pointlike body and halway inbetween do a dot and use this three point so create a volume Sphere (3 Dimensions).

Doing so, i very in line with your Dynamic Universe Model: properly deciding, computing and predicting.

Best, Manfred

Bookmark and Share


Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 24, 2020 @ 19:15 GMT
Manfred,

Pleased to get to read it again (needed as I often tend to 'scan' 1st time) and comment. You know from RG we agree on much but certainly not all. None the less it was interesting, and of course the scoring criteria have nothing to do with 'agreement' and I found it met all the criteria well (perhaps partly as I'm familiar with your style?) so I can score it highly.

I'm sure your aware that others may consider it takes us back centuries to 'earth centric' dynamics, certainly challenging to wide astronomical data! That quite unique view shouldn't affect scoring but, like mine, departure from even questionable doctrinal beliefs if often poorly received!

I also look forward to your views on my essay which I know you'll understand and also appreciate. I hope you'll confirm that and ask any questions.

Very best of luck in the contest.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Mar. 25, 2020 @ 20:34 GMT
Dear Peter,

thanks for your kind comments. I am aware that my "style" is quite different, and the purpose of my essay was not to get a "prize", but to provoke and invite for "thinking" in terms of "imagine" what could happen if Greta Thunberg is right and it could come to a finding that would say .. "This is all wrong". Are we prepared ? (like Bill Gates asked 2015 at Tedx if we are ready for a "Pandemic" game.)

I guess that all Talk is cheap and i will try to calculate an Experiment to demonstrate with laser in laboratory that E=hf is wrong hopefully till end of this year. We should not depend on belief, but on experimental physics.

I did not rated your essay yet, as i have printed it and will read it carefully within the next days and after that comment and rate on it Peter.

See you there,

all the best

Manfred

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on Apr. 26, 2020 @ 12:03 GMT
Dear Sirs,

i missed the deadline for update due to a quarantaine on Covid 19, so i attach it here

Best regards Manfred U.E. Pohl

attachments: It_takes_a_Decision_to_Decide_FQXi-update_26_04_2020.pdf

Bookmark and Share


Michael muteru wrote on Apr. 28, 2020 @ 20:12 GMT
why are we humans? do we decide our environment or does it decide who we are? may be a complex question.please read/rate my essay on how Human thought gives birth to the world we see and define here-https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.i really appreciate.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Author Manfred U.E. Pohl replied on Apr. 30, 2020 @ 05:04 GMT
Dear Michael Muteru,

the elephant in the room... yes.

I will read your essay and reply my comment in your thread.

Give me some days..

Best

Manfred

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on May. 3, 2020 @ 13:23 GMT
Finally i learned a lot during the essay contest and the "corona"-crisis and try to offer a new approach of science to the "NEW NORMAL" with an "educational" Video published on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIBjt_5TU0U

I wish everyone to stay safe and healthy in the crisis, as there is a call on us to stand together as one and to learn about our own personal history and traumatic childhood, when adults lied to us and claimed pi to be 3,14...

Best regards

Manfred U.E. Pohl

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on May. 3, 2020 @ 20:01 GMT
BTW.

i published Matrix decoded in April 2019:

https://www.amazon.com/Matrix-Decoded-Everything-Apocal
ypse-Revelation/dp/1095579665/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&qid=158853
5929&refinements=p_27%3AManfred+U.E.+Pohl&s=books&sr=1-2&tex
t=Manfred+U.E.+Pohl

There was sold only one ! single book from USA.

In August 2019 was announced Matrix 4.

Announced to be first showed to the world in Germany on 20.5.21 (my Birthday)

and 2nd in USA on 21.5.21..

I know the storyplot already ... :-)

Best fun.

Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on May. 5, 2020 @ 10:57 GMT
To finally explain the Turing completition of theoretical biology:

the "endgame" of the pyramid sheme (Exodus / Old Testament) is in principle the MOSES game trying to reenter Paradise.

Today

7,8 Billion people on the planet "think" they are more developed in life than mice in the kitchen. But they do "experiments" with mice i.E. to create vaccine or learn about biology....

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Author Manfred U.E. Pohl wrote on May. 6, 2020 @ 14:00 GMT
Here i try to look into the future of science in general to give an idea of what will happen if human being would apply the all new mathematics and physics. It is a question of "will" as David Bohm already pointed out 1990 in Amsterdam: we could change the direction, if we decide to do so.

Armageddon in Mathematics and Physics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKsgX9a5DsA

Might be disturbing to some scientist, because it looks like human beings are much more stupid then lions or dolphins. On the other hand, it is obvious that lions and dolphins are more clever, they have fun and don't work in circles.

In the end, now i left the feature to be a human being and became an animal, to be "above". But not like Planet of apes.

Best,

Manfred U E Pohl

Bookmark and Share


Anonymous wrote on May. 7, 2020 @ 20:28 GMT
And this is the attempt to skech

the new mathematics to fit the need for idea of Penrose and Smolin new mathematics to start from cratch with included mathematical "real" time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6XANmH0-I

best Manfred U E Pohl

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.