Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - March 16, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 1/16/20 at 16:49pm UTC, wrote Dear Dominico Oricchio Dominico hairdresser Dominiko is not a hairdresser...

Domenico Oricchio: on 1/8/20 at 14:21pm UTC, wrote Each quantum eigenstate of the unitary matrix, that give the dynamic of the...

Domenico Oricchio: on 1/8/20 at 14:20pm UTC, wrote I wanted to withdraw the essay: I thought that Kurt had joked with me. ...

Domenico Oricchio: on 1/7/20 at 17:54pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I think that quantum computers could solve Gödel's...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "It is unfortunate that there is no easy way to "show all replies", so that..." in Alternative Models of...

Malcolm Riddoch: "@Robert, sorry this forum software is rather obtuse and I couldn't find..." in Alternative Models of...

John Cox: "Lorraine, I briefly described the relationship of mass to inertia..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "John, I would say that you need to think what you mean by “physical..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "Re "I tend to speed-read then review before scoring after reading a good..." in Undecidability,...

John Cox: "George, We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

John Cox: "Georgi, by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel,..." in Watching the Watchmen:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
January 22, 2020

CATEGORY: Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest (2019-2020) [back]
TOPIC: Barber or not barber? by Domenico Oricchio [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.


Author Domenico Oricchio wrote on Jan. 7, 2020 @ 17:54 GMT
Essay Abstract

I think that quantum computers could solve Gödel's incompleteness theorems

Author Bio

graduation: mechanical engineering degree: physics thesis: deterministic neural network and fuzzy neural netwoek master: advanced technology in communication and information research: -Genova,fractal dimensionality and experimental discrete equation -Marina di Ravenna, fluid dynamic and bacteria grow equation -Vietri sul mare, fluido dynamic model applied to soil pollution and associate bioremediation -Manchester (interrupted), Natural Gradient Descent and Indipendent Component Analysis

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Author Domenico Oricchio wrote on Jan. 8, 2020 @ 14:20 GMT
I wanted to withdraw the essay: I thought that Kurt had joked with me.

But, in a profound sense, any quantum calculation involving the negation of a claim, in the form that Kurt presented me, give quantum contradiction in amplitude, and sometime in probability.

I am thinking that this contradiction is true for each quantum calculus, with feedbacks, or loops.

So it is possible that there is some truth in the claims.

Bookmark and Share



Author Domenico Oricchio wrote on Jan. 8, 2020 @ 14:21 GMT
Each quantum eigenstate of the unitary matrix, that give the dynamic of the quantum computer, has eigenvalue with modulus one. So that there is often a amplitude dynamic for the quantum computer. Each complex linear combintation of eigenstates give a unitary dynamic that is a complex linear combination with the same eigenstates that rotate in a complex plane (like a Fourier series).

Bookmark and Share



Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Jan. 16, 2020 @ 16:49 GMT
Dear Dominico Oricchio

Dominico hairdresser

Dominiko is not a hairdresser - he wrote an essay on the FQXi contest

We leave the hairdresser and look for a hairdresser in her neighborhood

We find a hairdresser and return him to the hairdresser.

Nature is afraid of emptiness, claimed the ancient philosophers.

Nature is not afraid of emptiness, Newton said and placed bodies in emptiness.

I see further, because I stand on the shoulders of a giant, he said about Descartes, who claimed that nature is afraid of emptiness.

Newton said space is a container of bodies.

No, Descartes said, space is matter that instantly fills the voids that can be formed in it by the will of God.

Now they say that in the world there is no movement speed greater than the speed of light, which means that the void does not disappear instantly, i.e. there is a void, but at the same time it is not. There is no instantaneous speed, but there is the speed of light. It follows from this that space moves at a speed no greater than the speed of light, since it is matter.

 Dear Dominico Oricchio, I invite you to discuss some aspects

The neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, which I set out in my essay: “The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich ". By the way, the probability density of the states of matter in it depends on the speed of its motion.

Sincerely, Boris Dzhechko.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.