If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Steve Dufourny: on 12/20/19 at 15:31pm UTC, wrote It seems evident that intelligence and consciousness are two things...
Steve Dufourny: on 12/6/19 at 14:39pm UTC, wrote Hi Mr Sloan, all this seems very relevant. I told me that we must...
Robert McEachern: on 12/5/19 at 19:25pm UTC, wrote You are barking up the wrong tree. It is the role of "information" and...
David Sloan: on 12/5/19 at 18:57pm UTC, wrote Fetzer Franklin Fund has partnered with FQXi to stimulate research on the...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Steve Dufourny: "3 main spacetimes, not 32 sorry, I write too quickly without rereading,..." in The Noise of Gravitons
Steve Dufourny: "Dear Steve, imagine if My assumption superimposing these spacetimes is..." in The Noise of Gravitons
berenice aldway: "Writing blog or different type of content writing needs a proper learning..." in Outside the Box
PRASAD DIVATE: "Hi all, I just read that there are 64 dimensions in the universe and God..." in AI, Consciousness,...
Steve Dufourny: "sure, without doubting ,we must doubt :) I make the same for all my model..." in AI, Consciousness,...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.
Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.
Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.
Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.
Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.
Steve Dufourny: on 12/20/19 at 15:31pm UTC, wrote It seems evident that intelligence and consciousness are two things...
Steve Dufourny: on 12/6/19 at 14:39pm UTC, wrote Hi Mr Sloan, all this seems very relevant. I told me that we must...
Robert McEachern: on 12/5/19 at 19:25pm UTC, wrote You are barking up the wrong tree. It is the role of "information" and...
David Sloan: on 12/5/19 at 18:57pm UTC, wrote Fetzer Franklin Fund has partnered with FQXi to stimulate research on the...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Steve Dufourny: "3 main spacetimes, not 32 sorry, I write too quickly without rereading,..." in The Noise of Gravitons
Steve Dufourny: "Dear Steve, imagine if My assumption superimposing these spacetimes is..." in The Noise of Gravitons
berenice aldway: "Writing blog or different type of content writing needs a proper learning..." in Outside the Box
PRASAD DIVATE: "Hi all, I just read that there are 64 dimensions in the universe and God..." in AI, Consciousness,...
Steve Dufourny: "sure, without doubting ,we must doubt :) I make the same for all my model..." in AI, Consciousness,...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.
Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.
Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.
Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.
Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.
FQXi BLOGS
September 22, 2020
Fetzer Franklin Fund has partnered with FQXi to stimulate research on the role of intelligence in the physical world. Research will be funded across a host of institutions around the globe, spanning the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, philosophy, neuroscience and information theory. At FQXi we try to promote rigorous research into new and underdeveloped areas that have the potential to fundamentally change the way in which we understand the world. Following on our previous program on “Agency in the Physical World,” the idea of intelligence, and how it relates to the world as described by physics, is an area we believe is ripe for investigation. In this round through a competitive peer review process we have selected nine proposals to receive large grants, totaling just under $1.5 million.
The exciting topics that will be investigated include:
1.) How an embryonic brain develops to produce complex behavior in organisms without the need to teach through examples.
2.) How do intelligent agents efficiently execute tasks in a quantum world?
3.) What can an agent with only access to probabilities conclude?
4.) Can agents with conflicting models of reality have equally useful information?
5.) Are physical laws the constructs of intelligent agents, and how do they encode information about the world?
6.) Does the universe “compute”? How is this rendered in biological systems?
7.) Do more complex systems process information at a higher level? Can this be used to define a collectivist notion of intelligence?
8.) Is intelligence limited by physical constraints such as the finiteness of resources available in the physical world and the laws of thermodynamics?
9.) What level of intelligence is needed to make predictions? How much memory is needed for this?
We would like to congratulate all our successful applicants and thank everyone who applied. We are particularly grateful to those who provided extended applications in the second round, and recognize the level of effort this entails. We’re looking forward to see the outcomes!
this post has been edited by the forum administrator
The exciting topics that will be investigated include:
1.) How an embryonic brain develops to produce complex behavior in organisms without the need to teach through examples.
2.) How do intelligent agents efficiently execute tasks in a quantum world?
3.) What can an agent with only access to probabilities conclude?
4.) Can agents with conflicting models of reality have equally useful information?
5.) Are physical laws the constructs of intelligent agents, and how do they encode information about the world?
6.) Does the universe “compute”? How is this rendered in biological systems?
7.) Do more complex systems process information at a higher level? Can this be used to define a collectivist notion of intelligence?
8.) Is intelligence limited by physical constraints such as the finiteness of resources available in the physical world and the laws of thermodynamics?
9.) What level of intelligence is needed to make predictions? How much memory is needed for this?
We would like to congratulate all our successful applicants and thank everyone who applied. We are particularly grateful to those who provided extended applications in the second round, and recognize the level of effort this entails. We’re looking forward to see the outcomes!
You are barking up the wrong tree. It is the role of "information" and "knowledge" rather than "intelligence" that is the key to understanding reality.
"Intelligence", is a "Johnny come lately" phenomenon, only made possible (via "emergence") by the prior existence of "non-intelligent", (1) information acquisition and (2) knowledge exploitation processes.
Rob McEachern
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission
report post as inappropriate
"Intelligence", is a "Johnny come lately" phenomenon, only made possible (via "emergence") by the prior existence of "non-intelligent", (1) information acquisition and (2) knowledge exploitation processes.
Rob McEachern
report post as inappropriate
Hi Mr Sloan, all this seems very relevant. I told me that we must differenciate the consciousness and the intelligence, they are not the same and they can be ranked too and even converge but they are different.
Regards
report post as inappropriate
Regards
It seems evident that intelligence and consciousness are two things different, we can have persons very intelligent having studied details but they are not universally conscious. The same in the other sense. That explains probably our main global major problems in the high spheres of power even because it lacks a kind of global universal consciousness in the governances. The ideal seems to have both to reach several relevances for global solutions where all wins. It is a complex puzzle but so evident.
report post as inappropriate
Login or create account to post reply or comment.