Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Steve Dufourny: on 12/20/19 at 15:31pm UTC, wrote It seems evident that intelligence and consciousness are two things...

Steve Dufourny: on 12/6/19 at 14:39pm UTC, wrote Hi Mr Sloan, all this seems very relevant. I told me that we must...

Robert McEachern: on 12/5/19 at 19:25pm UTC, wrote You are barking up the wrong tree. It is the role of "information" and...

David Sloan: on 12/5/19 at 18:57pm UTC, wrote Fetzer Franklin Fund has partnered with FQXi to stimulate research on the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "It is unfortunate that there is no easy way to "show all replies", so that..." in Alternative Models of...

Malcolm Riddoch: "@Robert, sorry this forum software is rather obtuse and I couldn't find..." in Alternative Models of...

John Cox: "Lorraine, I briefly described the relationship of mass to inertia..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "John, I would say that you need to think what you mean by “physical..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Lorraine Ford: "Re "I tend to speed-read then review before scoring after reading a good..." in Undecidability,...

John Cox: "George, We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

John Cox: "Georgi, by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel,..." in Watching the Watchmen:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi BLOGS
January 22, 2020

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Intelligence in the Physical World Grantees [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator David Sloan wrote on Dec. 5, 2019 @ 18:57 GMT
Fetzer Franklin Fund has partnered with FQXi to stimulate research on the role of intelligence in the physical world. Research will be funded across a host of institutions around the globe, spanning the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, philosophy, neuroscience and information theory. At FQXi we try to promote rigorous research into new and underdeveloped areas that have the potential to fundamentally change the way in which we understand the world. Following on our previous program on “Agency in the Physical World,” the idea of intelligence, and how it relates to the world as described by physics, is an area we believe is ripe for investigation. In this round through a competitive peer review process we have selected nine proposals to receive large grants, totaling just under $1.5 million.

The exciting topics that will be investigated include:

1.) How an embryonic brain develops to produce complex behavior in organisms without the need to teach through examples.

2.) How do intelligent agents efficiently execute tasks in a quantum world?

3.) What can an agent with only access to probabilities conclude?

4.) Can agents with conflicting models of reality have equally useful information?

5.) Are physical laws the constructs of intelligent agents, and how do they encode information about the world?

6.) Does the universe “compute”? How is this rendered in biological systems?

7.) Do more complex systems process information at a higher level? Can this be used to define a collectivist notion of intelligence?

8.) Is intelligence limited by physical constraints such as the finiteness of resources available in the physical world and the laws of thermodynamics?

9.) What level of intelligence is needed to make predictions? How much memory is needed for this?

We would like to congratulate all our successful applicants and thank everyone who applied. We are particularly grateful to those who provided extended applications in the second round, and recognize the level of effort this entails. We’re looking forward to see the outcomes!

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate


Robert H McEachern wrote on Dec. 5, 2019 @ 19:25 GMT
You are barking up the wrong tree. It is the role of "information" and "knowledge" rather than "intelligence" that is the key to understanding reality.

"Intelligence", is a "Johnny come lately" phenomenon, only made possible (via "emergence") by the prior existence of "non-intelligent", (1) information acquisition and (2) knowledge exploitation processes.

Rob McEachern

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


Steve Dufourny wrote on Dec. 6, 2019 @ 14:39 GMT
Hi Mr Sloan, all this seems very relevant. I told me that we must differenciate the consciousness and the intelligence, they are not the same and they can be ranked too and even converge but they are different.

Regards

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Dec. 20, 2019 @ 15:31 GMT
It seems evident that intelligence and consciousness are two things different, we can have persons very intelligent having studied details but they are not universally conscious. The same in the other sense. That explains probably our main global major problems in the high spheres of power even because it lacks a kind of global universal consciousness in the governances. The ideal seems to have both to reach several relevances for global solutions where all wins. It is a complex puzzle but so evident.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.