Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

Joe Fisher: "It seems to have escaped Wolpert’s somewhat limited attention that no two..." in Inferring the Limits on...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.


FQXi FORUM
January 21, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation by Robert D. Sadykov [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Robert D. Sadykov wrote on Nov. 28, 2008 @ 09:31 GMT
Essay Abstract

The system approach and special optical methods are applied to research of physical properties of time. Interesting results are obtained.

Author Bio

Department of scientific research TATNEFT, Kazan, Republic Tatarstan, RUSSIA

Download Essay PDF File




Robert Sadykov wrote on Nov. 28, 2008 @ 22:11 GMT
The given research of time is alternative to the special and general theory of relativity.




Cristi Stoica wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 13:31 GMT
Dear Robert,

Congratulations for the interesting and good-looking essay! I think that, together with the interpretation of the data based on the gravidynamic effect, you offer a totally fresh paradigm for General Relativity, if not an alternative theory.

Good luck with your research,

Cristi Stoica

“Flowing with a Frozen River”,

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/322




Robert Sadykov wrote on Dec. 9, 2008 @ 16:33 GMT
Dear Cristi Stoica,

One of many questions in the essay "Flowing with a Frozen River": is time discrete, or continuous? Or in other words: whether time has the quantum nature? In the essay "The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation" the time is created by the motion, and properties of the motion define properties of time. Therefore, discrete character of the motion in principle can form discrete time. But, all it is not so simple. The continuous motion forms the causal effect, which we observe, and the inertial mass here plays a large role. The causal effect in turn forms the arrow of time. In case of the discrete motion the causal effect is not obvious. The moving material point actually disappears in one spatial cell and afresh appears in the next cell. In this case all Universe periodically disappears and again is born in a somewhat changed form. Each material point should be in the separate cell of space some minimal time. Here we observe the second problem: it is impossible to find a physical meaning to minimal time, when any motion, i.e. any change of a state of the material system is absent. The third problem consists in necessity of renunciation of laws of conservation of energy and momentum because of the contradiction with the discrete time and discrete motion. Acceptance of the minimal space and minimal time can be caused by necessity to exclude infinitely large and infinitesimal values, for example, the infinitesimal sizes of the electron and infinitely large potential energy of the electromagnetic field of the electron. But, for this purpose there are other solutions (see essay). Thus, contrary to the general tendency to quantize all, we accept the continuous space, continuous time and continuous motion because of absence of any contradictions.

Yours faithfully

Robert Sadykov




Peter Lynds wrote on Dec. 10, 2008 @ 03:40 GMT
Excellent (and intriguing) essay Robert. As I don't believe that interval in time exists, I naturally understand what you are trying to do. Good luck.

Best wishes

Peter




narendra nath wrote on Dec. 14, 2008 @ 15:51 GMT
Dear robert,

On openng the site tob read your essay, i found only 1 st page and the rest were seen to be blank, a mystery indeed. How the rest disappeared from site is best known to you or the organisers of the website.

As per my understanding, if we hold spave and time as quantized, we do have the problem of the reality of existence appearing and disappering again and again. Time and space need to be continuosly flowing for us to accept these concepts to understand the observed phenomena in nature. Also, discontinuities may bring distortion in space and time that may well become meaningful if one believes in the Uncertainity relations between pairs of conjugate pairs.We are saved by nature by our inability to analyse a single event of a physical process in measurement. We are bound to avarage overa large no. of events before we get a number to represent the process using probability concept. I just wonder how is it that all physical processes follow yhis priciple of randomicity of individual events, as if everything is governed by chance. How come that the reality of physical existence demaqnd no order or logic in manifesattaion of any process. When one looks at the evolution of the Universe, the whole thing appears to follow a logical planned design. Then where all this 'order'seems to lie when an individual process is being investigated and we claim to see/observe only a magnitude that is an average of a large number of individual events. To me, order seems to contain the disorder too but not the other way around. Similarly, Silence appears to contain the noise too but not the other way around.




Robert Sadykov wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 02:13 GMT
Dear Narendra Nath,

Two approaches to definition of the nature of time in the given essay is realized. 1) Definition of connection of time with space, motion, inertia, gravitation, momentum and energy. 2) Definition of all physical factors having influence on the time flow speed. After generalization of all received results the full portrait of physical time is created. Besides, many interesting strokes are added to portraits of space, energy, inertia and gravitation.

Regards,

Robert Sadykov

PS On website everything is all right, but if to open essay still a problem, then can be sent the test letter to the address robertsadykov@mail.ru, and I shall send a file of essay.




Robert Sadykov wrote on Dec. 16, 2008 @ 10:37 GMT
Dear Peter Lynds,

If something has any physical properties then it exists. Both the motion and time have physical properties. Therefore, we accept their existence. The time is created by the motion and depends on the motion. Therefore, in case of the discontinuance of any motion the time disappears. The problem arises, if we unreasonably expand number of physical properties of time. For example, in case of the gravitational radiation the time exists irrespective of a source of the gravitational field and has substantial character, in particular, contains energy. It is a mistake of the general theory of relativity and by the way not single.

Regards,

Robert Sadykov




James Putnam wrote on Dec. 29, 2008 @ 17:37 GMT
Dear Robert D. Sadykov,

I agree that the speed of light decreases with increasing graviational effects. I include this same concept in my theoretical work. Our presentations are different. I applaud you for looking for a more logical explanation for relativity type effects. You win one of my restricted votes.

James Putnam




Robert Sadykov wrote on Jan. 8, 2009 @ 12:24 GMT
Dear James A. Putnam,

Speed of light plays the important role in understanding of the nature of time. Three possible reasons exist for an explanation of the observable constancy of speed of light:

1. Feature of propagation of light in the vacuum;

2. Feature of propagation of light in the luminiferous ether;

3. Feature of propagation of light in the gravitational field.

The first reason is considered in the special theory of relativity, where speed of light in vacuum is the constant for any inertial observer. The second item is presented in different variants of the ether theory. The third reason is researched in the essay The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation, where the constancy of speed of light is consequence of action of gravitation. In this theory it is proved, that the time dilation and increase in inertial mass are gravitational effects. The inconsistent effect of longitudinal length contraction in the new theory is absent. Any contradictions typical for the special theory relativity, for example, the clock paradox are absent also. As is well known, in the general theory of relativity a problem of gravitational energy still remains not solved. In the new theory gravitational energy is precisely localized.

Regards,

Robert Sadykov




James Putnam wrote on Jan. 11, 2009 @ 21:14 GMT
Dear Robert Sadykov,

The subject of my essay is taken from my work at http://humansignificance.com. The full theoretical work relies upon the changing speed of light. Our presentations and conclusions have major differences. At the end of my essay I referred to mass as being the inverse of acceleration. The fundamental property that undergoes this acceleration is light. I also mentioned that the absoluteness of time is the physics key to achieving theoretical unity. The reason I said this was: My work uses changes in the speed of light as the single original cause for all effects. The fundamental increment of time presented is: The constant universal reference by which to measure all effects with respect to time. So, our presentations are different in significant ways. Still, I am pleased to see that you took this opportunity to present a case for your theory. Rather than talking about my ideas which I did not make a part of my essay, I would be interested in having you elaborate, if it can be done here in a helpful way, on the conclusions you mention in section 15. Ockman's Razor.

Regards,

James Putnam




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.