Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Lee Bloomquist: on 12/8/18 at 0:58am UTC, wrote Our understanding of wave function collapse uses the language of...

Georgina Woodward: on 11/12/18 at 3:01am UTC, wrote Just shutting up and calculating won't do. The steps are; correctly...

Georgina Woodward: on 11/4/18 at 22:02pm UTC, wrote Specifically identifying and naming the issue is a significant advance. It...

Georgina Woodward: on 11/2/18 at 21:04pm UTC, wrote 'Category differentiation error' and 'category omission error' can come...

Georgina Woodward: on 11/2/18 at 20:07pm UTC, wrote These errors (identified in previous posts) could be called 'category...

Georgina Woodward: on 10/31/18 at 19:09pm UTC, wrote This problem is not exactly category error but is an error that involves...

Georgina Woodward: on 10/28/18 at 23:01pm UTC, wrote As an electron is only ever measured to have one location, under what...

Georgina Woodward: on 10/28/18 at 19:32pm UTC, wrote Steve, my aim is not to simplify the answer to why there is that stated...


Jason Wolfe: "Hi Georgina, Steve, What is reality? The humorous answer, almost at the..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Joe, What you are saying sounds like mathematics. But mathematics doesn't..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Jason, You can only unnaturally make an infinite number of finite written..." in First Things First: The...

Jason Wolfe: "As for religious fundamentalists, I would rather deal with them, then with..." in More on agency from the...

Jason Wolfe: "The best we can do with the environment is to plant more trees and..." in More on agency from the...

gmail login: "Thanks a lot for the post. It has helped me get some nice ideas. I hope I..." in Bonus Koan: A Lake of...

Georgina Woodward: "Steve, I don't think the quantum representation of the hydrogen atom is an..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

SAJ Real Estate: "Nice one. Real Estate Sales St Kitts" in A Close Encounter

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

November 17, 2019

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Space-time from Collapse of the Wave-function [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger Tejinder Pal Singh wrote on Sep. 9, 2018 @ 18:40 GMT
The world of large things such as tables, planets, stars and galaxies, is extremely different from the world of small things such as electrons, protons, atoms, and photons. The most striking difference is that a table is never found in more than one place at the same time, whereas as electron or an atom can be in many places at the same time. Why should there be this difference? After all, a table...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

post approved

Steve Agnew wrote on Sep. 15, 2018 @ 15:06 GMT
Singh has a really good approach for resolving the measurement issues by localizing a wavefunction with new noise constants, rC and tC. By adding a teeny tiny bit of noise to physical reality, Singh shows that wavefunctions will collapse even without an observer and so continuous spontaneous collapse (CSL) is quite hot right now, especially with the Smolin group at Perimeter.

Of course, the universe is already full of noise even without a new operator and its two new constants. For example, the orbit of an electron around a proton in hydrogen means that there are both charge and gravity fluctuations outside of the atom even without a new operator and constants.

In fact, at the characteristic radius, rC = 70 nm, between two hydrogens, the dispersion force of charge attraction equals the gravity force between the two neutral hydrogens. This rC depends on existing universe constants and likewise, a characteristic time tC= 3.9Byrs, comes from the ratio of gravity to charge at the hydrogen orbit.

So without any new constants, existing gravity noise in the universe is sufficient to collapse quantum wavefunctions without further ado. In fact, these values are consistent with the present state of CSL and show that future measurements will actually measure these fluctuations. However, the present physics already predicts that they exist and so measurement will simply be a confirmation and not any new physics...

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Marcel-Marie LeBel replied on Oct. 23, 2018 @ 04:15 GMT
Georgina, Steve,

Every bit out there exists and interacts with its own immediate vicinity. The notion of "table" or "universe" is an integration resulting from our own perceptual and mental fabrication. It is the conscious observer's privilege. There is no Big thing, just a "Big Picture". As with any picture, there is a camera, and we are it.

Please consider that in most cases, QM describes how the universe works (small scale), and GR describes how the universe appears to work (large scale).


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward wrote on Oct. 1, 2018 @ 00:59 GMT
Hi Tejinder, Steve,

there is a category issue with the introductory comparison of the electron particle and table.For the electron to be in a location it must be a be-able rather than a probability distribution of states/values prior to selection of the singular defining measurement, For the table to be in a certain location it too must be a be-able, (which is constituted of be-able particles). However if talking of the object seen in space-time it is not a be-able but the product of processing of received EM radiation. It is not made of be-able particles, like the be-able table. What precisely is being compared is important.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Oct. 1, 2018 @ 01:41 GMT
If the location of a particular table in a conference room was mapped over several years a probability distribution for the table could be obtained. When the question is asked, 'where is the table?' One could refer to the probability distribution and say it doesn't have a singular location (Compare to electron). Or One could say, as a be-able is being considered ( not an EM radiation processing product or a probability distribution) it must be in a location but it is as yet undetermined by direct (interaction with) measurement.

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Oct. 1, 2018 @ 02:14 GMT
Measurement by interaction with the object will give a space location and time when that was true (local, to table and measurer, clock time, which is very close to the -Now due to the extreme speed of light). Rather than spacetime generated from signal receipt and processing.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Oct. 1, 2018 @ 07:46 GMT
If the tables are pushed to the sides of the room between conferences and occupy the body of the room during conferences, there will be oscillation between the side locations and main body locations for the individual tables. If the conferences happen on a regular basis the oscillation will be regular. What will decide between most likely getting a side of room location or a main body of room location when a measurement is made is the choice of how that measurement is to be made. If it will coincide with maximum number of people present in the building or minimum number of people, for example. The addition of conference attendees will add slightly to the uncertainty of exact location that will be found as they may nudge or rearrange the tables slightly but are not the cause of the main body or side location (as the tables will likely have been arranged before their arrival and re-arranged after they leave).

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Marcel-Marie LeBel wrote on Oct. 2, 2018 @ 22:27 GMT
The precision about the actual position of the table can never be

greater than the actual size of the table, because everywhere on the table is 'table'.

This is why we have the uncertainty principle. We are dealing with particles whose sizes include both the particle and its associated wave,

i.e. their intrinsic motion.

For comparison, it is like estimating the position of a boat from its

actual size plus its wake.

Also, it goes without saying, that position and momentum (speed) are two conceptually opposite concepts. But if you insist, you have to accept this uncertainty.


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Lorraine Ford replied on Oct. 3, 2018 @ 08:26 GMT
Re "The precision about the actual position of the table can never be greater than the actual size of the table, because everywhere on the table is 'table'. This is why we have the uncertainty principle.":

Marcel, this is not what the uncertainty principle is about.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Marcel-Marie LeBel wrote on Oct. 5, 2018 @ 00:23 GMT

Thanks for the update. You are right. I typed up a big text ... but it wasn't convincing... even to me. I Wikied the uncertainty Principle (UP). .. And got some answers.

The UP describe an intrinsic property of nature which reflect into our measurements. The source of this uncertainty is my question.

1. you have the mathematical nature of waves and wave function

2. you have the constant turmoil of vacuum which create uncertainty

3. you have the temporary transformation of a probability distribution into wave function by the constraint produced by measurement...

I am trying to see more clearly into this...


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Lee Bloomquist wrote on Dec. 8, 2018 @ 00:58 GMT
Our understanding of wave function collapse uses the language of “standard analysis,” which is not a good language for talking about existence— which is the problem here. Instead of a “limit”, which necessarily involves statements about numbers on a real number line— which therefore say that before the”limit” can exist, there must first exist this number line stretching in front of...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.