Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Joe Fisher: on 10/19/18 at 15:26pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar...

Joe Fisher: on 10/18/18 at 15:11pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar...

Joe Fisher: on 10/15/18 at 21:16pm UTC, wrote It had to happen, and it happened today. I posted the above comment on...

Joe Fisher: on 10/15/18 at 15:42pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar...

Joe Fisher: on 10/12/18 at 15:10pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar...

Joe Fisher: on 10/11/18 at 15:15pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish...

Joe Fisher: on 10/9/18 at 15:19pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish...

Joe Fisher: on 10/6/18 at 12:30pm UTC, wrote Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish...



FQXi FORUM
October 20, 2018

ARTICLE: Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes [back to article]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Peter Morgan wrote on Aug. 31, 2018 @ 23:30 GMT
"Once you start thinking of an agent as a quantum system in his or her own right, says Renner, things get complicated." The initial conditions get complicated, but the equations of motion might and presumably will still be simple, as they are in classical physics. Planck's constant, that Lorentz invariant scale of action, is still the one that rules them all when it comes to measurement incompatibility and quantum fluctuations, come whatever else may.

I look forward to them finding ways to finesse that, as if to make Planck's constant locally look as if it's smaller, even while in principle it's still a universal constant.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 1, 2018 @ 12:52 GMT
VISIBLE reality am not a theory. The real VISIBLE earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of years before any theoretical physicists ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing their unnatural silly guesswork concerning abstract observers of some imaginary cat that could have been affected by some sort of burst of temporary finite invisible quantum particles. All real observers have always seen the real VISIBLE surface of every real cat they have ever seen and they have been able to deduce that the real VISIBLE surface of the cat that did not move was a pretty convincing clue that it would be a real dead cat.

This logically means that it was Nature that designed the only single structure of the real VISIBLE Universe allowable. There must have only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Finite Time cannot exist in ETERNITY. Finite distance cannot be measured infinitely.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Robert H McEachern wrote on Sep. 1, 2018 @ 23:05 GMT
"One of the foundational insights of quantum theory is that, just by observing a system, you change it."

That is not an insight. It is a delusion. Like the famous cat, a coin is neither heads nor tails, until some observer decides to "call it", but that act of observation did not change the state of the coin - it does not collapse into a one-side coin. The observation merely changed the observer's mental state that models the coin, not the coin itself.

Rob McEachern

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe William Fisher replied on Sep. 2, 2018 @ 12:40 GMT
Dear Robert H McEachern,

The August 31, 2018, article Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes written by Kate Becker that was published by FQXI.org, contains this utterly incomprehensible statement:

“One way to interpret this is that the observation caused the cat’s wavefunction—the mathematical expression of the cat’s possible states and how likely they are—to "collapse" into a single outcome. But today many theorists favor a different way of thinking, called the "many worlds" interpretation. In this view of things, observing the cat makes reality branch into two separate but equally valid realities. In one, the cat lives; in the other, it dies.”

NATURAL VISIBLE REALITY am not a stupid humanly contrived theory. Nature only ever provided one VISIBLE reality. There has only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring ETERNALLY in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Sep. 4, 2018 @ 06:44 GMT
Linguistically, live and dead cat are both the cat object. The live cat though has functioning aerobic respiration and many processes occurring in the body that rely upon that biochemistry. The dead cat is not respiring. Many processes are not functioning because of that and other biochemistry such as autolysis, the break down of cells, is happening. The live and dead cat are not the same object if the biochemistry is considered. Linguistically, broken and intact poison flask are both flask object. Their topology is very different though. Shards of glass are different objects to the intact flask if topology is considered, Linguistically, decayed and non decayed radioactive particle are both the particle. However if an alpha or beta particle is lost they are not the same object anymore. Different objects can't be in a state of superposition, only different states that might be observed pertaining to the same object. So the thought experiment is not a good analogy.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Sep. 4, 2018 @ 15:09 GMT
Dear Georgina Woodward,

Natural VISIBLE reality am not a humanly contrived imaginary abstract thought process. Please do try to understand that Nature provided one VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light BEFORE you published your finite guesswork statement at this site.

A real live cat and a real dead cat will always have a real VISIBLE surface. All real cells will always have a real VISIBLE surface. There has never been any invisible finite “processes.” Every real intact poison flask has always had a real VISIBLE surface. Every real shard of every real shattered poison flask has always had a real VISIBLE surface. Invisible quantum particles have never existed. All the lying CERN scientists have ever accomplished am to present a computer enhanced cartoon of supposedly small green finite shaped rectangles representing live quantum particles colliding and turning into smaller yellow rectangles representing decayed quantum particles. Their ridiculous search for the invisible Higgs Boson that supposedly has the least finite amount of mass am insane. Different abstract objects have different abstract finite amounts of invisible “mass.” ALL REAL OBJECTS ETERNALLY SHARE ONE VISIBLE INFINITE SURFACE THAT AM ALWAYS MOSTLY ILLUMINATED BY FINITE NON-SURFACE LIGHT.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Sep. 4, 2018 @ 21:25 GMT
Infinitely trolling with a shallow running crank bait is what's visible.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 9, 2018 @ 14:44 GMT
Theoretical physics am unnatural human guesswork. Although there are many human theories concerning the apparent finite structure of the universe and its finite duration offered by many theoretical physicists in many languages, there am only one real NATURAL VISIBLE REALITY. There has only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light. Every common cockroach knows that it shares its VISIBLE surface with the VISIBLE surface that surrounds it.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 17, 2018 @ 14:26 GMT
Dear Loyal Reality Followers,

The September 14, 2018 Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this ridiculous statement:

“Stanford University has released a five-part series that outlines the ways that theoretical physicists at Stanford University have contributed to the development of the String Theory Landscape. The series includes profiles of Closer To Truth contributors Leonard Susskind, Andrei Linde, and Alan Guth.”

Naturally, I posted this sagacious comment at the website:

Provable fact: The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of years before any Stanford University theoretical physicists ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing their utterly unnatural silly guesswork about invisible finite imaginary universes. Multiple universes would require multiple realities.

It logically follows that NATURE must have devised the only physical structure of the real Universe allowable. There must only ever have been one REAL unified infinite VISIBLE surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, The Lone Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 18, 2018 @ 13:55 GMT
Dear Potential Realists,

Yesterday’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this ridiculous statement:

“Could information be the stuff of which everything is made? Information seems so abstract, not a substance or a thing, so how could it be the building blocks of reality? There are ways and reasons how information can literally be reality, some scientists claim, and their ideas are revolutionary. Cosmologist and professor Sean M. Carroll provides his perspective on our featured topic of the week in this interview.”

I have posted this comment at the website:

Unnatural humanly contrived information has absolutely nothing to do with realty. There are many types of humanly devised finite information. There am only one VISIBLE reality. INDISPUTABLE FACT: The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of years before Professor Sean M. Carroll appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his unnatural silly guesswork concerning invisible quantum particles.

Logically, NATURE must have devised the only real physical structure of the Universe allowable. There must only have ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 20, 2018 @ 14:59 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this preposterous statement:

“Seth Lloyd is a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, and refers to himself as a “quantum mechanic”. In this interview, Lloyd makes the claim that the universe is a computer. He argues that the statement is a mathematical theorem, not a metaphor. Do you agree?”

I sensibly left this comment at the website:

There are many different types of computers. They all have one thing in common. Every real computer has a real VISIBLE surface. Every real computer programmer has a real VISIBLE surface. The only indisputable fact you ever need to know am that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Lloyd ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural silly guesswork concerning some sort of finite imaginary universe.

There has only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 21, 2018 @ 15:17 GMT
Dear Reality Brethren,

Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this codswallop assertion:

“Is it possible to believe that information is the ultimate reality when one believes in God? Don Page is a quantum physicist who believes in God. In this interview, he discusses his belief that God is the ultimate source of reality. He mentions that our conscious perceptions are more important than information, but information is a useful way of talking about the universe.”

Fortunately, for sensible folk’s sake, I left this comment at the website:

Humanly contrived finite information has absolutely nothing to do with reality. There are many levels of information about many invisible Gods, there has to be only one provable reality. Indisputable fact: The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Don Page ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural inane guesswork concerning an invisible God’s effect on a finite imaginary universe.

Obviously, NATURE must have devised the only real physical structure of the Universe allowable. There must only ever have been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Truth will set you free,

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 24, 2018 @ 20:39 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar assertion:

“What do we know and how do we know it? What is knowledge? What is belief? How is belief justified? What justifies us in believing what we believe? Andy Clark is a professor of philosophy and Chair in Logic and Metaphysics at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. In this interview, he discusses the implication for knowledge and how we have it.”

Fortunately for Closer to Truth Facebook page readers, I left this sensible comment at the website:

Humanly contrived guesswork about whether some professors could be more capable of guessing what human knowledge might be than human dustmen are, has absolutely nothing to do with reality.

Indisputable fact: The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Andy Clark ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural pretentious guesswork concerning abstract human knowledge that am rationed out to humans through invisible individual consciousness.

Logically, NATURE must have devised the only real physical structure of the real Universe obtainable. There has only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light .

NATURE provided the only reality that could easily be handled by every insect, fish, fowl, and every animal except man. Man has only provided scientific, religious, philosophical, and political codswallop.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Sep. 27, 2018 @ 15:30 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar assertion:

“Meghan Sullivan is a Professor of Philosophy and the Rev. John A. O’Brien Collegiate Chair at Notre Dame. In this interview, she lends her thoughts on epistemology through a philosophical lens. She states that she is starting to take skepticism more seriously, but says that going “full Cartesian” may not be a practical way to live your life.”

I posted this sensible comment at the website:

The only condition every human being ever born will “know” am how to behave unnaturally. The more “knowledge” any human claims to have, the more unnaturally that person will behave. There has only ever been one indisputable fact: the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Meghan Sullivan ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing her utterly unnatural guesswork concerning finite invisible abstractions.

Obviously, NATURE must have devised the only real physical structure of the Universe allowable.. There has only ever been one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light .

Humans do not have a natural habitat. They spend most of their time unnaturally sitting in unnatural cubes unnaturally thinking about what other humans might unnaturally be thinking about them.

Joe Fisher, Realist Extraordinary

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 2, 2018 @ 17:49 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar assertion:

“Religion without God? Most people believe that God exists and religion is God's revelation. But some say religion, particularly the organization of religion into institutions, needs nothing supernatural to begin, develop and multiply. In other words, religion without God can flourish because personal psychology and group sociology drive religion. Dr Susan Blackmore is a freelance writer, lecturer, and a Visiting Professor at the University of Plymouth. Her research interests include evolutionary theory, consciousness, memes (not the kind you find on the internet), and meditation. In this interview, Dr. Blackmore provides her perspective on the topic of religion explained without God.”

I thoughtfully posted this sensible comment at the website:

There am many versions of Religion. There am only one reality. That one reality has only one visible structure. That reality has only one indisputable real fact. The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Susan Blackmore appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing her religious guesswork. Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only REAL Universe allowable. There has only ever been one REAL unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 4, 2018 @ 14:45 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook Page contains this outlandish announcement:

“Mark Vernon is a writer, broadcaster and journalist. He began his professional life as a priest in the Church of England. In this interview, Mark probes the question of what religion is even with no God.”

I immediately posted this corrective comment:

There am many versions of Religion. There am only one reality. That one reality has only one visible structure. That reality has only one indisputable real fact. The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Mark Vernon appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural religious guesswork. Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only REAL Universe allowable. There has only ever been one REAL unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Sublime Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 6, 2018 @ 12:30 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish announcement:

“Religion might just be a byproduct of something that was useful to us, whether or not religion is of any use to us.” - Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is a physiologist, ecologist, biologist, geographer, anthropologist, and author. With such a eclectic background, Jared provides interesting approach to the topic of religion without God by discussing the “evolution” of religion

I posted this helpful comment at the website:

There am many versions of Religion. There am only one reality. That one reality has only one visible structure. That one reality has only one indisputable real fact. The real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Jared Diamond appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural finite religious guesswork. Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only REAL Universe allowable. There has only ever been one REAL unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, the one true Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 9, 2018 @ 15:19 GMT
Today’s Closer to Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish announcement:

“What enables structures to form in the universe? How did galaxies, stars and planets develop from the primeval plasma soup? In this interview, Abraham ‘Avi’ Loeb presents his thoughts on fine-tuning in cosmology.”

I posted this helpful comment at the website:

The real VISIBLE Universe must have only one real VISIBLE structure. The only structural fact that am indisputable confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Avi Loeb ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural grotesque guesswork concerning invisible finite vacuums and finite abstract cosmic constants.

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable.

There has only ever been, and there will only ever be, one unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist Primo

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 11, 2018 @ 15:15 GMT
Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook Page contained this outlandish announcement:

“What are the laws of nature that bring about these cosmic bodies and did those laws have to be just so? Is it legitimate science to see fine-tuning in cosmology? In this interview, Fred Adams expounds on the questions surrounding fine-tuning in cosmology.”

I immediately posted this sensible comment:

Humanly contrived concepts of nature can have any number of supposedly finite laws. Real NATURE has only one real law. The real VISIBLE Universe must have only one real VISIBLE structure. The only structural fact that am indisputable confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Fred Adams ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural preposterous guesswork concerning invisible finite protons and photons and finite abstract black holes existing in some finite earlier version of an imaginary universe.

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable.

There has only ever been, and there will only ever be, one real unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one real infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by real finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist Extraordinary

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 12, 2018 @ 15:10 GMT
Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar announcement:

“Bernard Carr is a Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy at Queen Mary, University of London. In this interview, Bernard describes the landscape of fine-tuning in cosmology, and its ranges of categories. For more on this topic.”

I immediately posted this sensible comment at th website:

Natural VISIBLE reality am ETERNAL Humanly contrived concepts of abstract cosmology can have any number of supposedly finite laws. Real NATURE has only one real law. The real VISIBLE Universe must have only one real VISIBLE structure. The only structural fact that am indisputable confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Professor Bernard Carr ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural preposterous guesswork concerning his finite fine tuning of supposedly finite invisible gravitational and atomic forces that somehow affected some sort of imaginary universe.

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable.

There has only ever been, and there will only ever be, one real unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one real infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by real finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist to the Stars

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 15, 2018 @ 15:42 GMT
Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar announcement:

“How prevalent is life throughout the universe? We now know that there are likely even more planets than there are stars. So, is life in the cosmos prevalent or rare? Either answer yields profound implications. In this interview, Mario Livio addresses these questions surrounding life in the cosmos.”

I thoughtfully posted this sublimely sane comment at the website:

Natural VISIBLE reality am ETERNAL Real NATURE has only one real law. The real VISIBLE Universe must have only one real VISIBLE structure. The only structural fact that am indisputable confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Mario Livio ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural preposterous guesswork concerning imaginary planets having some sort of finite life forms.

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable. There am only one immortal VISIBLE life form. All real fauna and flora have a real VISIBLE surface. It would be unnaturally illogical and structurally impossible if any life form surface was somehow visually separable from any non-life form surface.

Joe Fisher, Not very well known Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 15, 2018 @ 21:16 GMT
It had to happen, and it happened today. I posted the above comment on Mario Livio's Facebook page and he thanked me for leaving the comment. He is the first Physicist of the 220 I have made aware of Natural Visible Reality to ever give me a response.

I replied by posting this comment:

Just as there has never been identical snowflakes, there will never be identical planets. Therefore, unique immortal life will only ever be VISIBLE on planet Earth.

Joe Fisher, Gifted Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 18, 2018 @ 15:11 GMT
Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar announcement:

“Luke Barnes is a theoretical astrophysicist, cosmologist and postdoctoral researcher at Western Sydney University. In this interview, he discusses ideas surrounding life in the cosmos.”

I instantly posted this sensible comment:

Reality am not a theory. Natural VISIBLE reality must be ETERNAL Real NATURE must have only one real law. The real VISIBLE Universe must have only one real VISIBLE structure. The only structural fact that am indisputable confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Luke Barnes ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural preposterous guesswork concerning imaginary planets having some sort of finite life forms especially created by an invisible God..

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable. There am only one immortal VISIBLE life form. All real fauna and flora have a real VISIBLE surface. It would be unnaturally illogical and structurally impossible if any life form surface was somehow visually separable from any non-life form surface. No two snowflakes have ever been found to be identical, so obviously, no two planets could ever be identical. Life must be unique to this planet.

Joe Fisher, Realist First Class

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe William Fisher wrote on Oct. 19, 2018 @ 15:26 GMT
Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar announcement:

“Fred Adams is a professor of physics at the University of Michigan. In this interview, Fred expounds upon the idea of life outside of Earth.”

I posted this sensible comment at the website:

One real visible universe must only have one true determination. The only indisputable fact we all know confirms that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years before Fred Adams ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his utterly unnatural preposterous guesswork concerning imaginary planets possibly orbiting fabulous stars.

Obviously, NATURE must have produced the only real VISIBLE structure of the real VISIBLE Universe obtainable.

There has only ever been, and there will only ever be, one real unified VISIBLE infinite surface ETERNALLY occurring in one real infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by real finite non-surface light.

Real Physicists have proven that no two real VISIBLE snowflakes of the trillions that have fallen have ever been physically identical. Logically, that means that there never could ever be identical VISIBLE physical planets, and that logically also means that only VISIBLE unique life has only ever immortally existed on part of the VISIBLE infinite surface of the real planet Earth.

Joe Fisher, Realist Extraordinaire

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.