Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Herbal Sejagat: on 11/27/18 at 7:47am UTC, wrote Jantung merupakan organ utama pusat aliran darah dalam tubuh kita....

Joe Fisher: on 7/19/18 at 14:43pm UTC, wrote The sad fact is that no physicist has ever studied actual visible physical...

Chris Roger: on 7/18/18 at 17:03pm UTC, wrote Superb Information, I really appreciated with it, This is fine to read and...

peter cameron: on 7/17/18 at 11:08am UTC, wrote screensnap of the SciMeter thread on Sabine's blog. Point is that it is...

Sabine Hossenfelder: on 7/16/18 at 13:00pm UTC, wrote I have a bad memory for names. But it’s not equally bad for all names. I...


Steve Dufourny: "I guess that sphères are the foundamental objects.That said we can..." in YouTube Video Lectures:...

Georgina Woodward: "Thanks. I didn't make clear that not only is the clock generated event,..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

ken koi: "Thank you for posting such a great article! I found your website..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Steve Agnew: "Very good! A clock makes very regular events and events are things that..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello, Space does not seem to exist. If we have a kind of superfluid in..." in YouTube Video Lectures:...

Anonymous: "The idea that brains are somehow involved in limb regeneration is not the..." in Constructing a Theory of...

bell cord: "It is nice to see the post here. You explained in a nice way.Thanks for..." in Multiversal Journeys: The...

bell cord: "It is nice to see the post here. You explained in a nice way.Thanks for..." in Multiversal Journeys: The...

click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

June 26, 2019

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: SciMeter: A New Way to Search ArXiv [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger Sabine Hossenfelder wrote on Jul. 16, 2018 @ 13:00 GMT
I have a bad memory for names. But it’s not equally bad for all names. I recall Germanic and Anglo-saxon names more readily than Indian or Chinese names. I recall short names better than long names. I recall common names better than uncommon ones. So, when I organize a conference, how do I avoid a bias for people whose names my brain happens to have stored?

I used to ask my colleagues, and scan participant lists of similar conferences, and browse papers on the conference topics. But often I wished there was a way to just bring up a list of all physicists who worked on a topic or a combination of topics. This, so I thought, wouldn’t only be useful to organize a conference, it would also help journalists who search for an expert’s comment, or editors who search for reviewers.

And – drums please! –  you can now do such a search on our just-launched website SciMeter. Just enter one or several topics, hit submit, and you get a name of everyone whose arXiv papers have focused on the topics you look for.

Wait, that’s not all. On our website you can also create a keyword cloud from your arXiv papers, you can learn how broadly distributed your research topics are (over all arXiv topics), and you can search for authors with similar research interests. For example, here is the keyword cloud for Brian Greene:

This website was made possible by a mini-grant from FQXi. Frontend and backend became reality thanks to my collaborators Tobias Mistele and Tom Price.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

peter cameron wrote on Jul. 17, 2018 @ 11:08 GMT
screensnap of the SciMeter thread on Sabine's blog. Point is that it is potentially useful to take a peek in vixra as well, and with arxiv app written the easiest next app would be vixra. There's treasure everywhere, to quote Calvin and Hobbes.

attachments: sabineCommentSciMeter.PNG

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe William Fisher wrote on Jul. 19, 2018 @ 14:43 GMT
The sad fact is that no physicist has ever studied actual visible physical reality. Had they did so, they could have easily established that all matter, be it solid, liquid, or vaporous, has a real visible surface. The earth had a real visible surface for millions of years BEFORE Newton, Einstein, Hawking, and Witten appeared on that surface and began publishing their senseless guesswork about an unnatural invisible void; unnatural invisible gravity; unnatural invisible quantum particles that could be in multiple invisible places at the same moment of time; invisible finite black holes, or invisible finite strings.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.