If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home

Introduction

Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

Introduction

Terms of Use

*Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.*

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

**Steve Dufourny**: *on* 8/4/18 at 7:19am UTC, wrote Hi Joe, thanks for this advice , :) regards

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 8/3/18 at 14:47pm UTC, wrote Dear Steve, You are never going to get better until you become capable of...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 8/3/18 at 14:39pm UTC, wrote Dear CLAUDE MICHAEL CASSANO, The earth had a visible surface for millions...

**Steve Dufourny**: *on* 8/3/18 at 9:57am UTC, wrote Quasicrystals and the exceptionnal E8 group.Relevant about our space time...

**CLAUDE CASSANO**: *on* 8/3/18 at 4:09am UTC, wrote My "almost quantum theory" (actually a mathematical model is summarized in...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 7/23/18 at 15:12pm UTC, wrote On last night’s CBS broadcast of the 60 Minutes television show. A female...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 7/22/18 at 15:02pm UTC, wrote The supposedly “Revolutionary” Special Fall 2018 edition of Scientific...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 7/17/18 at 16:32pm UTC, wrote It was really exceptional for Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder, to develop a...

FQXi FORUM

November 27, 2020

Dear FQXi.org Members,

Visible reality has nothing to do with meaningless speculation about invisible quantum particles. The contention by theoretical physicists that any invisible quantum particle could be in multiple invisible positions at the same time is utterly absurd. To go further, for the theoretical physicist to maintain that any invisible quantum particle could perform a finite spin in a finite invisible direction is delusional.

Please get real. All real matter has a real visible surface. There am only one visible infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Visible reality has nothing to do with meaningless speculation about invisible quantum particles. The contention by theoretical physicists that any invisible quantum particle could be in multiple invisible positions at the same time is utterly absurd. To go further, for the theoretical physicist to maintain that any invisible quantum particle could perform a finite spin in a finite invisible direction is delusional.

Please get real. All real matter has a real visible surface. There am only one visible infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

"But quantum theory has been around for over a century, so, if Navascués is right, why haven’t we seen a trace of behaviour beyond it yet?"

The reason is obvious: Navascués is not even remotely right. The correlations have been shown to have a simple, classical explanation.

Rob McEachern

report post as inappropriate

The reason is obvious: Navascués is not even remotely right. The correlations have been shown to have a simple, classical explanation.

Rob McEachern

report post as inappropriate

Dear Robert H McEachern,

As Navascués says."Every theory proposed so far to describe the universe has been refuted,"

This is solely because Reality am not a theory. The real earth has had a real visible surface for millions of years. All matter has a real visible surface whether it is a solid boulder, a puddle of water, or a cloud. It logically follows that there must only be one visible unified infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

As Navascués says."Every theory proposed so far to describe the universe has been refuted,"

This is solely because Reality am not a theory. The real earth has had a real visible surface for millions of years. All matter has a real visible surface whether it is a solid boulder, a puddle of water, or a cloud. It logically follows that there must only be one visible unified infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

It was really exceptional for Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder, to develop a reliable search engine for arXiv,” based on topics of interest, and create keyword clouds. with the help of an FQXi mini-grant:”

The only problem am that it only searches for theoretical physics articles written about invisible phenomena. My research has concluded that the earth had a real visible surface for millions of years before Newton, Einstein and Hawking appeared on that surface and began publishing their senseless guesswork about an unnatural invisible void and unnatural invisible gravity, and unnatural invisible quantum particles that could be in multiple unnatural invisible places at the same time, and unnatural invisible finite black holes.

Logically, Nature must have devised the only visible structure of the real Universe allowable. There am only one visible unified infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light. I cannot get my essay REALITY AM NOT ROCKET SCIENCE published in arXiv format because it am unclassifiable, and no credentialed scientist would ever endorse it.

Ruefully, Joe Fisher

report post as inappropriate

The only problem am that it only searches for theoretical physics articles written about invisible phenomena. My research has concluded that the earth had a real visible surface for millions of years before Newton, Einstein and Hawking appeared on that surface and began publishing their senseless guesswork about an unnatural invisible void and unnatural invisible gravity, and unnatural invisible quantum particles that could be in multiple unnatural invisible places at the same time, and unnatural invisible finite black holes.

Logically, Nature must have devised the only visible structure of the real Universe allowable. There am only one visible unified infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light. I cannot get my essay REALITY AM NOT ROCKET SCIENCE published in arXiv format because it am unclassifiable, and no credentialed scientist would ever endorse it.

Ruefully, Joe Fisher

report post as inappropriate

The supposedly “Revolutionary” Special Fall 2018 edition of Scientific American contains a dated preposterous essay written by By Juan García-Bellido, and Sébastien Clesse entitled: Is Dark Matter Made of Black Holes? Clesse prefaces his participation with the absurd claim: “A hidden population of black holes born less than one second after the big bang could solve the mystery of dark matter.”

Matter am not in the least bit mysterious. All mater, whether it am solid, liquid, or vaporous has a visible surface.

The earth had a real visible surface for millions of years before Newton, Einstein and Hawking and Juan García-Bellido, and Sébastien Clesse ever appeared on that surface and began publishing their senseless guesswork about an unnatural invisible void and unnatural invisible gravity, and unnatural invisible quantum particles that could be in multiple unnatural invisible places at the same time, and unnatural invisible finite black holes.

Logically, Nature must have devised the only visible structure of the real Universe allowable. There am only one visible unified infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Revolutionary Realist

report post as inappropriate

Matter am not in the least bit mysterious. All mater, whether it am solid, liquid, or vaporous has a visible surface.

The earth had a real visible surface for millions of years before Newton, Einstein and Hawking and Juan García-Bellido, and Sébastien Clesse ever appeared on that surface and began publishing their senseless guesswork about an unnatural invisible void and unnatural invisible gravity, and unnatural invisible quantum particles that could be in multiple unnatural invisible places at the same time, and unnatural invisible finite black holes.

Logically, Nature must have devised the only visible structure of the real Universe allowable. There am only one visible unified infinite surface occurring eternally in one infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Revolutionary Realist

report post as inappropriate

On last night’s CBS broadcast of the 60 Minutes television show. A female astrophysicist explained that when the Hubble Space Telescope was pointed at a supposedly black void of the sky just “above” the Big Dipper for a couple of weeks, suddenly, myriads of galaxies began to appear and they were photographed. Fresh calculations were made by NASA mathematicians, and it now seemed that there could be two trillion galaxies fizzing about out there.

Except on June 2, 2016, “Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope have discovered that the universe is expanding 5 percent to 9 percent faster than expected.”

NASA cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim that any percentage of the universe consists of “dark matter,” then point the Hubble telescope at a black section of the sky and discover previously hidden galaxies.

All matter has a visible surface because only one unified visible infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that an always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light has ever existed.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Except on June 2, 2016, “Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope have discovered that the universe is expanding 5 percent to 9 percent faster than expected.”

NASA cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim that any percentage of the universe consists of “dark matter,” then point the Hubble telescope at a black section of the sky and discover previously hidden galaxies.

All matter has a visible surface because only one unified visible infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that an always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light has ever existed.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

My "almost quantum theory" (actually a mathematical model is summarized in the FXQi articles "Physics is a Branch of Mathematics" and "Understanding Fundamental and Foundational" (full mathematical model workup found in the references provided in them).

It is consistent with the pre-Higgs Standard Model and makes Higgs particle superfluous and describes mathematical description of fermion masses and fermion interactions and fermion and hadron architectures - why the group natures are what they are from constructable algebras rather than symmetry arguments.

(where the symmetries come from)

report post as inappropriate

It is consistent with the pre-Higgs Standard Model and makes Higgs particle superfluous and describes mathematical description of fermion masses and fermion interactions and fermion and hadron architectures - why the group natures are what they are from constructable algebras rather than symmetry arguments.

(where the symmetries come from)

report post as inappropriate

Dear CLAUDE MICHAEL CASSANO,

The earth had a visible surface for millions of years BEFORE you published your senseless mathematical guesswork, It logically follows that Nature must have devised the only real visible structure of the Universe allowable. There has only ever been one real visible infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

The earth had a visible surface for millions of years BEFORE you published your senseless mathematical guesswork, It logically follows that Nature must have devised the only real visible structure of the Universe allowable. There has only ever been one real visible infinite surface eternally occurring in one infinite dimension that am always mostly illuminated by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Quasicrystals and the exceptionnal E8 group.Relevant about our space time and corrélations with strings about fields and rankings. A beautiful fractal.

I ask me wht could be the results if we correlate with a fractal of spherical volumes and that we consider these finite series instead of points.We could go farer still about the ranking of groups and properties.

The E8 fractal can be superimposed to this primordial fractal of spheres and we can correlate with the p adics analyses for these finite series, primes are relevant considering their non divisibility.The rankings of groups can be improved.

We can compare the main cause of shapes, geometries, topologies ,external or internal.That could permit to reach this quantum gravitation in comparing the results by simulations.We can unify G c h we can solve the problem at quantum scale considering this general relativity.

report post as inappropriate

I ask me wht could be the results if we correlate with a fractal of spherical volumes and that we consider these finite series instead of points.We could go farer still about the ranking of groups and properties.

The E8 fractal can be superimposed to this primordial fractal of spheres and we can correlate with the p adics analyses for these finite series, primes are relevant considering their non divisibility.The rankings of groups can be improved.

We can compare the main cause of shapes, geometries, topologies ,external or internal.That could permit to reach this quantum gravitation in comparing the results by simulations.We can unify G c h we can solve the problem at quantum scale considering this general relativity.

report post as inappropriate

Dear Steve,

You are never going to get better until you become capable of grasping reality. Please stop attempting to deal with finite misinformation about invisible space/time.

Joe Fisher. Realist

report post as inappropriate

You are never going to get better until you become capable of grasping reality. Please stop attempting to deal with finite misinformation about invisible space/time.

Joe Fisher. Realist

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.