Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

andrea gonzalez: on 6/1/19 at 4:17am UTC, wrote Your article is accurate and I benefit. I have read many articles, but I...

Steven Andresen: on 2/22/18 at 6:32am UTC, wrote Dear Narada If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 2/14/18 at 1:42am UTC, wrote Dear Prof Narada, Thank you for a nice essay. You are correct in saying...

Juan Ramón González Álvarez: on 2/6/18 at 19:49pm UTC, wrote The idea that physics encourages "pursuing universal truths" is an ancient...

Juan Ramón González Álvarez: on 2/6/18 at 19:25pm UTC, wrote The above post is mine. I was logged out when submitting.

Anonymous: on 2/6/18 at 19:20pm UTC, wrote The idea that physics encourages "pursuing universal truths" is an ancient...

Narada Wickramage: on 2/4/18 at 18:20pm UTC, wrote I have said the following in my essay: “General relativity and quantum...

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 2/4/18 at 11:38am UTC, wrote Dear Narada Wickramage, wonderful says: “There are no infinite number...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Isn't symmetry simply closely related to redundancy even if physicist may..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Robert Rise: "Meet many types of women on ihookup. Some dates better than others. It is..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Steve Dufourny: "FQXI you too I need your help, come all too we have a work to do there..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "lol REVOLUTION SPHERISATION everywhere at all scales,REVOLUTION..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 23, 2019

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: What is Fundamental? by Narada Yasaskantha Wickramage [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Narada Yasaskantha Wickramage wrote on Feb. 2, 2018 @ 19:00 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay argues that unless the universality of knowledge could be proven, we have no choice other than admitting the contextual validity of knowledge and points out that physics and mathematics of 20th and 21st centuries do not encourage pursuing universal truths and the best we can achieve is knowledge consistent within a given context or paradigm. Therefore as the answer to the question “what is fundamental” this essay proposes that what is fundamental is always context dependent and no universally fundamental things can be found.

Author Bio

Author is a computer engineer.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Flavio Del Santo wrote on Feb. 3, 2018 @ 21:08 GMT
Dear Narada Yasaskantha Wickramage,

thank youy for your interesting essay.

I am quite sure you could be interested in my ideas as well in the essay entitled "Demolishing prejudices to get to the foundations", where, we argue that "what is fundamental?" is method-dependant, and in saying this, I think we are addressing one instance of what you call context-dependancy.

Your essay is unfortunately missing the references.

I look forward to discuss our essay in comparison, if you will find time to go through mine.

Best wishes,

Flavio

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Feb. 4, 2018 @ 11:38 GMT
Dear Narada Wickramage, wonderful says: “There are no infinite number ofpeople in the world and the consent received from a finite number of humans does not make something auniversal truth (other than creating a false sense of objectivity).” However, in the context of the modern development of science, it is necessary to recognize the principle of the identity of space and matter Descartes' as essential. New Cartesian physics, which is based on the identity space and matter of Descartes’, wants to be the theory of everything. According to Descartes, space is matter, and matter is space that moves. Thus, space is the foundation for constructing fundamental theories.

Look at my essay, FQXi Fundamental in New Cartesian Physics by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich Where I showed how radically the physics can change if it follows this principle. Evaluate and leave your comment there. Then I'll give you a rating as the bearer of Descartes' idea. Do not allow New Cartesian Physics go away into nothingness.

Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Narada Yasaskantha Wickramage replied on Feb. 4, 2018 @ 18:20 GMT
I have said the following in my essay:

“General relativity and quantum mechanics are not compatible because they are based on two different sets of assumptions and it is clear that these assumptions are conflicting. Almost always scientific breakthroughs are made by changing the assumptions and therefore investigating the assumptions is as important as empirical validation and the...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Anonymous wrote on Feb. 6, 2018 @ 19:20 GMT
The idea that physics encourages "pursuing universal truths" is an ancient philosophical idea that was abandoned many time ago.

Yes, the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible, but this is not anything special; the history of science is full of cases where two or more incompatible theories co-exist until finally the incompatibility is solved by developing a new...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Juan Ramón González Álvarez wrote on Feb. 6, 2018 @ 19:25 GMT
The above post is mine. I was logged out when submitting.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Juan Ramón González Álvarez wrote on Feb. 6, 2018 @ 19:49 GMT
The idea that physics encourages "pursuing universal truths" is an ancient philosophical idea that was abandoned many time ago.

Yes, the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible, but this is not anything special; the history of science is full of cases where two or more incompatible theories co-exist until finally the incompatibility is solved by developing a new...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 14, 2018 @ 01:42 GMT
Dear Prof Narada,

Thank you for a nice essay. You are correct in saying that GR and QM have different fundamental assumptions. Have a look at my essay again with different assumptions...

I hope you will not mind that I am not following main stream physics...

By the way…Here in my essay energy to mass conversion is proposed...……..….. yours is very nice essay best wishes...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steven Andresen wrote on Feb. 22, 2018 @ 06:32 GMT
Dear Narada

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don’t rate them at all. Infact I haven’t issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


andrea morewar gonzalez wrote on Jun. 1, 2019 @ 04:17 GMT
Your article is accurate and I benefit. I have read many articles, but I found a lot of

ideas in this article. LIC Guide

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.