Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Mr Michael Popov: on 1/16/09 at 10:34am UTC, wrote In accordance with commentaries I'd like to make some refinements. ...

Cristi Stoica: on 12/8/08 at 5:15am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Popov, Very interesting essay, bringing the Pauli effect into...

matthew kolasinski: on 11/28/08 at 4:27am UTC, wrote Hello Dr Popov i may be mistaken, but what you are looking at here appears...

Venerando: on 11/21/08 at 23:53pm UTC, wrote It seems to me that yours is one of the "local hidden variables"...

Michael Alekseevich Popov: on 11/21/08 at 10:18am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract It is just merely attempt to generalize some...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar..." in Dissolving Quantum...

Georgina Woodward: "Just shutting up and calculating won't do. The steps are; correctly..." in Space-time from Collapse...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar..." in Dissolving Quantum...

Georgina Woodward: "Specifically identifying and naming the issue is a significant advance. It..." in Space-time from Collapse...

Steven Andresen: "Anybody got the inside word on the theme for this years essay contest? ..." in Alternative Models of...

john smith: "It's a new thing for my knowledge I am looking for the same I recently..." in Neutrino mysteries,...

Elina Williams: "Technology is becoming an integral part of our life. From handheld devices..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

Jena Somerhalder: "Hello! I must say this post is very interesting for reading. I found there..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

Constructing a Theory of Life
An all-encompassing framework of physics could help to explain the evolution of consciousness, intelligence, and free will.

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.


FQXi FORUM
November 13, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Testing Two-Dimensional Time by Michael Alekseevich Popov [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Michael Alekseevich Popov wrote on Nov. 21, 2008 @ 10:18 GMT
Essay Abstract

It is just merely attempt to generalize some results of my Oxford experiments with time (2007-2008).

Author Bio

Was born in Russia and educated in Leningrad (St Petersburg) State University 1974-1983 (including Russian type of PhD studentship in experimental ethnology(social anthropology) 1979-1983). Presently, Oxford - based independent experimental anthropologist having contract with Tesco Corporation,UK.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Venerando wrote on Nov. 21, 2008 @ 23:53 GMT
It seems to me that yours is one of the "local hidden variables" variations. In your case, strategies are the local hidden variables. As said in Wikipedia

"One apparent way to explain found correlations in line with the predictions of quantum entanglement is an approach known as "local hidden variable theory", in which unknown, shared, local parameters would cause the correlations. However, in 1964 John Stewart Bell derived an upper limit, known as Bell's inequality, on the strength of correlations for any theory obeying "local realism." Quantum entanglement can lead to stronger correlations that violate this limit, so that quantum entanglement is experimentally distinguishable from a broad class of local hidden-variable theories."

Bookmark and Share



matthew kolasinski wrote on Nov. 28, 2008 @ 04:27 GMT
Hello Dr Popov

i may be mistaken, but what you are looking at here appears similar in some respects to Gilles Brassard's (http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~brassard/) 'Quantum Pseudo-Telepathy' game. ( http://www.springerlink.com/content/7w061h21v1326u8r/fulltex
t.pdf )

which yields a winning strategy for two quantum entangled players with no data communication resulting in a 59% overall 'hit' rate in 1,000 trials, in classical terms, expecting a 50% 'hit' rate, that's odds against chance of 225 million to one. (this project remains conceptual at this time)

an example of quantum entanglement leading to stronger correlations in violation of Bell's limit as mentioned above by Mr. Venerando.

it may be of interest you.

thank you for your paper,

matt kolasinski

Bookmark and Share



Cristi Stoica wrote on Dec. 8, 2008 @ 05:15 GMT
Dear Dr. Popov,

Very interesting essay, bringing the Pauli effect into discussion, under a new perspective on time.

Best wishes,

Cristi Stoica

“Flowing with a Frozen River”,

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/322

Bookmark and Share



Mr Michael Popov wrote on Jan. 16, 2009 @ 10:34 GMT
In accordance with commentaries I'd like to make some refinements.

1.Speaking generally, Oxford game is based on two empirical rules: every Friday and Sat the presence of player A at the area of "Top Shelf" and around (so-called "Red Square") produced always(!)at least, during 2007-2008 similar very positive trend of sales at this area;and, correspondingly, every Fri and Sat the absence of player A at the area of Top Shelf and around profuced negative trend of sales in the Square of supermarket. Because any counter-example was not found during 2007-2008, Oxford game became real mystery for Tesco stuff and customers.

2. Online sales are connected statistically with the sales at area of Top Shelf, however, technically it is not always possible to realize and to prove such sort of quantum-like correlation .

3. Thus, in the case of statistics of the sales from area of Top Shelf we have indeed quantum-like winning strategy (100%),but not in online sales. This fact can be used to deny all Oxford game, all statistics, an existence of Top Shelf and "Red Square".

4, Magic perfect correlation between location of player A and synchronous trend of sales was an object re-examination of Human rights activists, shoppers and probably some goverment organizations. They tried to abolish experiment, but his profitability was serious counter-argument.

5. Presently,I made decision to stop experiment becuase I faced with strong pressure of public opinion in Oxford.

6. My general lesson is: we can play macroscopic quantum-like games, but such technology of power is very advanced for public opinion and popular culture. Quantum games today can produce unexpected psychological consequances of the global character, indeed. Hence, I suppose we can play quantum macroscopic games only in reduced or soft version in laboratory only.

Presently, I try to find a way to reproduce Oxford game in laboratory.

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.